Talk:Newcastle Light Rail

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 26 January 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 57 14:35, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Newcastle Light RailNewcastle Light Rail project – construction of light rail is contingent on result of government elections and would not be completed for three years 122.104.32.91 (talk) 12:02, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose – no clear rationale for why that would be a better title. Dicklyon (talk) 05:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Newcastle Light Rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stations / stops[edit]

Recently seperate articles have been created for each stop. Generally these are not notable, with a fair bit of repition. Suggest that a seperate section be created in this article and the tram stop articles redirected. The other two NSW light rail articles, CBD and South East Light Rail and Dulwich Hill Line, articles are structured this way. Turingway (talk) 07:12, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Supported Nothing notable about any of these stations.Fleet Lists (talk) 08:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
These articles will never be more than stubs. Expecting readers to visit a gaggle of short articles to learn about a topic is not very helpful. Support merging. Gareth (talk) 04:24, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]