Talk:Nikon D3

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nikon D3 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Replacing the D2H and D2Xs?[edit]

The article states that "The D3 is the top model in Nikon's line, superseding both the D2Xs and D2H". I have read that this is primarily and photojournalist/sports photographer camera replacing the D2H, and a high res studio camera (probably called "D3X") is due next year to replace the D2Xs. They are discontinuing the D2H and are not discontinuing the D2Xs. Also, the D3, when in DX mode, is only a 5.1 MP camera, unlike the D2Xs which is a 12 MP DX camera. --rogerd 17:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, well I think that if Nikon had wanted this to be mainly the high-speed flagship camera, it would have been called the D3H. Also, full frame doesn't much benifit sports shooters because it forces one to use longer and slower lenses. I also feel the DX mode is a bit of a gimmick. I mean, If you can spend $6000 on a camera body, you don't want to get bad results because of cheap lenses. You might be right, but I would wait a few days until the hype slows a bit. -Fcb981^{(talk:contribs)} 03:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at the moment it's superseding the D2Xs and D2Hs, that will change when the D3x is out. But OTOH its such a major step for Nikon (FX sensor) that they deceided not to add a letter like H. Just like they did with the D1 once.

--Valwit 19:13 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Audience section[edit]

I did some editing of the "Audience" section. The grammar was horrible; it's still not very cohesive and may be trying to be too technical for its own good? 69.249.98.184 14:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vertical grip[edit]

The discussion of the vertical grip seems completely irrelevant to anything. Anyone disagree with removing it? Micahmedia (talk) 07:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Memory buffer upgrade[edit]

If anyone knows more about it, there should be a discussion of the memory buffer upgrade Why for example does doubling the memory result is more than double (from 28 to 68) the number of shots in NEF (RAW) (12-bit lossless compressed mode FX mode, but no increase at all in small JPGs (it remains at 130). I suspect this is related to the fact that small files can be shited to main memory at a rate close to the maximum frame rate of the camera, but much larger files can't be transfered as quickly. But a more detailed explanation would be useful. MightyBig (talk) 16:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The artile states the upgrade would expand the camera's memory to "2GB". However, I cannot find any reliable source for this. Nikon itself does not seem to mention the actual amount of memory in their announcement, so, where does this number come from? If this is not coming from a reliable source, but from someone who snapped up something somewhere, can we be sure that "2GB" really means 2 Gigabyte here? I'm asking, because on circuit diagram level (service manual), memory chip capacities are usually given in bits, rather than bytes (for example "1G DDR2 SDRAM" is not 1 GiB, but 128 MiB). So, while this may be interesting information for the techies, if we don't find a good source for this, we should better remove the "2GB" bit, IMHO.-- 84.63.52.9 (talk) 19:53, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nikon D3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091208074011/http://www.dxomark.com:80/index.php/eng/DxOMark-Sensor/Camera-rankings to http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/DxOMark-Sensor/Camera-rankings

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]