Talk:Onslaught (1989 video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Mario vs. Donkey Kong (5 participants)
Wired (demoparty) (1 participant)
Rewired (demoparty) (0 participants)
Grossology (books) (5 participants)
Studio Yotta (1 participant)
Vicious Engine (3 participants)
Jack Marston (Red Dead) (8 participants)
Joshua Tomar (6 participants)
Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants; relisted)
Starwing Paradox (3 participants; relisted)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (start)
AirCars (start)
Laura Matsuda (start)
SHODAN (nom)
Puff-puff (Dragon Quest) (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

On 17 April 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Onslaught (video game) to Onslaught (1989 video game). The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 17 April 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 18:16, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Onslaught (video game) → Onslaught (1989 video game) – Disambiguation against Onslaught (2009 video game). Discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Onslaught (video game) should be moved. Potentially controversial or needs discussion. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 18:03, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support this one gets 173 views but the 2009 one gets 126[[1]] way too close for a PDAB. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:33, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Neither game is especially well-known, so diambiguating in this way is a more natural way of getting readers to the article they're looking for.--Martin IIIa (talk) 01:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support WP:NOPRIMARY situation, probably uncontroversial move that could have just been boldly done sans discussion tbh. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I agree, but a discussion was requested on the link i provided. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 14:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. It appears that the 2009 video game is not based on the 1989 video game but instead the games are completely separate. Thus neither game is the primary topic. JIP | Talk 01:30, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - obvious conclusion. $ɱ$ (talk) 17:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.