Talk:Pamela Dalton

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notability?[edit]

Says on page. Verified in source 1.

.seVer!Ty^- (talk) 20:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A source written by the subject does not show notability. --JD554 (talk) 20:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And by others? .seVer!Ty^- (talk) 20:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference #3 doesn't say anything at all about anything and reference #4 contains one quote from Dalton in an article about something else. That isn't enough to satisfy criteria at WP:BIO. --JD554 (talk) 20:28, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Reference #3 is a paid subscription site. How about reference #5? .seVer!Ty^- (talk) 20:30, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The references need to be about Dalton herself. It's obvious you think she is notable, but I'm not 100% convinced so I'll change the speedy to a WP:PROD which will give you five days to find reliable sources to back up your claims. --JD554 (talk) 20:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable. Thanks. .seVer!Ty^- (talk) 20:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

←The Times article convinced me. Well done, that was quick work! --JD554 (talk) 20:44, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. I vote notable. --Tagishsimon (talk) 21:16, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same here. However, note #6 is a blog, which may be considered a questionable source by some. It should probably be replaced by the original source from New Scientist; or you could give the original source (cite journal) and link to the blog.[1] Thanks.—RJH (talk) 00:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pamela Dalton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110525112514/http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v5/n3/suppinfo/nn803_S1.html;jsessionid=F5063AD04B6D6A06FA54A52FC68437DD to http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v5/n3/suppinfo/nn803_S1.html;jsessionid=F5063AD04B6D6A06FA54A52FC68437DD

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]