This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British crime, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.British crimeWikipedia:WikiProject British crimeTemplate:WikiProject British crimeBritish crime articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
The article makes references to "appliances", which makes me imagine a bunch of blenders, mixers, and food processors were used, but from the context, I gather fire engines were sent (I hope) to the fire. It must be British dialect, but please link to the appropriate article. Boneyard90 (talk) 13:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
10mmsocket, I wanted to explain the issue that arose on this page about Karen Pedley back in March. On 19 March you (rightly) deleted the section about Pedley being a possible suspect, saying: "Neither the press article, nor the Sky TV programme (which I have just watched) make any mention of the hotel in relation to the suspect. Thus, this is conjecture / original research WP:OR." This was absolutely correct because I had actually added the wrong source - I added the "Women Who Kill" documentary titled Karen Pedley by mistake, when I meant to cite it to the "Nurses who Kill" documentary on Karen Pedley [1] instead. So after you deleted the content on 19 March I realised my mistake and re-added the content on 27 March with the correct reference: [2]. However, you then immediately deleted it [3] and said "Sorry but none of those references name the woman. Thiis is a serious BLP infringement even if the person named is a convicted criminal". I think you assumed that I had re-added the original content with the same, incorrect, documentary, as the one I added the second time very much does name her and the content was then correctly verified. I thought I would clarify this as I can see it's a mistake that would have been easy to make, and I obviously won't re-add the content if it causes issues, I just think we just got off to the wrong start and I wanted to try and reconciliate. BarehamOliver (talk) 18:58, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
