Talk:Persona 5: Dancing in Starlight

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Deep Silver[edit]

Is there a source? Didn't Altus open an EU branch to publish these games themselves?Muur (talk) 07:32, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have the games. Like Ultimax, this was published by SEGA. Here's my source https://i.imgur.com/iFyRGpP.jpg .Muur (talk) 17:55, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It also clearly states it was developed by P Studio, something that used to be a point of discussion for these games in the past. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 19:26, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, guess I'm glad I could help solve that issue then.Muur (talk) 05:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P5D credits[edit]

Here they are. Sk8erPrince (talk) 23:27, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, they aren't credited in the EU version... weird. you don't have it for 3, do you? cuz they aren't credited there either.Muur (talk) 09:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal: Merging P3DiM and P5DiS[edit]

These games share the exact same gameplay, story, and development history, and their articles seem to be 80+% similar to each other. In addition, five different outlets bundled their reviews of both games into a single article. 1 2 3 4 5

I already made a draft merged version in my userspace at User:QuietCicada/PersonaDancingMergeDraft, and it's ready for mainspace with consensus. "Persona 3: Dancing in Moonlight and Persona 5: Dancing in Starlight" should be a good title.

Pinging ProtoDrake, the creator of both articles. QuietCicada - Talk 21:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - It's basically a "Pokemon Red and Blue" or "Battle Network 3: Blue and White" situation. As separate versions, they don't require their own articles. The one thing I'd add to the merged version is to have a split review box since some sites, like Gamespot and Game Informer, reviewed both versions separately.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 12:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]