Talk:Predictive engineering analytics

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 13 June 2016 by reviewer Dodger67 (talk · contribs).

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems Low‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Systems engineering.

AFC Review[edit]

I puzzles me that there is any doubt that this article is suitable for inclusion. The user who wrote it should be commended for a detailed and well-sourced article. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 02:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Oiyarbepsy thanks for your input. Would you please do the necessary finishing touches such as categories, wikilinks, etc.

The answer to your puzzlement is that none of your fellow engineering topic specialists are bothering to do any reviewing at AFC. For a non-specialist such as myself it can be very hard to judge whether a topic is gibberish or truly notable or might already be covered in another article or original research, or any number of other reasons why it should not be accepted.

Thanks for helping and please feel free to pop over to AFC when you have a few minutes free, you might find a few good articles among the junk submissions that constantly stream in. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Oiyarbepsy, thank you a lot! I appreciate your comment! @Roger (Dodger67), a lot of topics can be linked to this, and it fits some categories. I'd love to do that! Unfortunately, being new at wikipedia, I am still struggling a bit with the practical execution :-) BartVanLierde (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]