Talk:Rahul Kohli

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 March 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Pronouns[edit]

Someone keeps adding an explanation that Rahul uses he/him and they/them. There's no need to explain that Rahul uses he as a pronoun. Just use it. It's not confusing and an explanation is not necessary. -Solid Reign (talk) 02:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, he has stated that he emphasizes this in an attempt to normalize the practice of informing people of your preferred pronoun, even if you´re a cis-gender. I think it should be included in the article. 91.186.71.3 (talk) 08:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More recent photo?[edit]

Any chance we can use a more recent photo of him? 203.114.152.250 (talk) 10:50, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rephrase personal section?[edit]

"Heavy use of X" definitely made me think something entirely unintended there. 2600:1700:3AE0:1000:453E:13CB:62:6D26 (talk) 00:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DOB[edit]

Wikipedia standards are that if “sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object to the details being made public” confirm DOB, then it is acceptable to be included. He’s posted about his DOB on Instagram, which implies that he doesn’t object to the details being made public, not sure why it keeps getting edited out 38.66.69.41 (talk) 02:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely because the reliable source has never been added at the same time? We need a definitive source which gives entire dob, preferably more than one. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]