Talk:Reactions to global surveillance disclosures

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reactions to global surveillance disclosures article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Psychology Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations B‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mass surveillance High‑importance

	Reactions to global surveillance disclosures is within the scope of WikiProject Mass surveillance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of mass surveillance and mass surveillance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.Mass surveillanceWikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillanceTemplate:WikiProject Mass surveillanceMass surveillance articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Globalization Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plural[edit]

Usually these disclosures are referred to in the plural, although Snowden's disclosure is over, the disclosures in the press, those we are recording here, are plural and ongoing. petrarchan47 t c 23:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So we have:

2013 global surveillance disclosures
- Timeline of mass surveillance disclosures
- Aftermath of the global surveillance disclosure

Aftermath isn't even the correct word. The disclosures are ongoing yet the events described in this article occurred in the past. "Reactions to global surveillance disclosures" is my choice. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 08:16, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath of the global surveillance disclosure → Reactions to global surveillance disclosures – "The disclosures are ongoing" Anonymouscoward2421 (talk) 17:54, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support the proposed rename, to more accurately describe the contents of the article. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Restore the Fourth[edit]

Would anyone care to do the honors and merge Restore the Fourth into this article? Proposal here, no response after two weeks. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 08:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of information removed[edit]

Could editors take a look at this, I'm not sure where all the removed information has gone. I know there was an attempt to add some back to the Snowden article, which is silly as these spin off articles were created because the main article is packed. petrarchan47 t c 07:32, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No citation of the HTTPS-massive-adoption as reaction[edit]

See the statistical growth of HTTPS from 2013 onwards... And its explosion after 2016, when cost barriers were overcome: see for example https://letsencrypt.org/stats/ and campaigns like Mozilla's https://blog.mozilla.org/internetcitizen/2017/04/21/https-protect/

Krauss (talk) 09:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

-FsA14 - Freiheit statt Angst 060 (15062050686) (2).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]