Talk:Religious calling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Roman Catholic an Eastern Orthodox Churches[edit]

The article should also mention the notion of calling in Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches, a term that is used to refer to priestly vocations. ADM (talk) 18:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think vocation, linked in the first line, covers that. Johnbod (talk) 21:07, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protestant[edit]

Protestantism is a more prominent and general faith. It's more prominent and general use of "calling" should come first. --Carlaude (talk) 03:52, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, and the OED cites back to 1560, so the virtually, or wholly, identical LDS meaning is not the earliest either. In fact (OED 6) very similar usage in a Catholic context is cited back to c1300. I have changed the order backJohnbod (talk) 04:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Religious calling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Funny subject[edit]

Need secondary and non-biased, reliable sources that are arguable through multiple dimensions. At least a solid backup from good authorities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.1.202.13 (talk) 15:47, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]