Talk:Runestone Keeper

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the indie task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Vette (Star Wars) (2 participants)
International Hobo (1 participant)
Wally Scharold (3 participants)
Cake Mania (series) (1 participant)
Omocat (5 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (9 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (5 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (17 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (15 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

ZX Spectrum (nom)
Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Strago Magus (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
General Leo (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Missile Command 3D (nom)
Harold Halibut (start)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (start)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Home Safety Hotline (nom)
Klefki (start)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Virtual Boy Wario Land (start)
Lucky Luna (start)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (start)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Notability[edit]

Is this game notable? No Metacritic reviews, and sourced solely to short TouchArcade and PocketGamer news stories (not reviews), an overview in 4gamer, and a Softpedia review. I wouldn't call that significant coverage. If this was a request, I would have just removed it for poor sourcing. czar 16:57, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Metacritic, or indeed the number of reviews a game gets, is not the be-all-end-all of notability. Considering I was able to use reliable sources to write a reasonably long synopsis of the game's gameplay, etc., in its entirety, I'd say that it fulfills notability. Usually when a game is non-notable you cannot summarize it from reliable sources without using original research. I'd also argue that the 4Gamer and TouchArcade mentions are pseudo-reviews, as they include subjective recommendations of the game, not just objective overviews._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:10, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar: Might this be a reliable review? Site does say that it has an editorial team._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like your average Medium (website) hobbyist blog to me (having people designated "editors" doesn't necessarily mean they have any pedigree, editorial standards, or reputation for fact-checking/accuracy) czar 19:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]