Talk:Seymour Hicks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should Seymour Hicks filmography be merged here?[edit]

Discussion already in progress at Talk:Seymour Hicks filmography#Separate filmography. postdlf (talk) 19:21, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes. I see no reason why not. --Michig (talk) 20:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No. Film made up only a small part of Hicks's career, so listing a long filmography in this article would unbalance the article and make the film portion of his career too prominent. It is better to have a narrative discussion of his most prominent film-related activities in this article, and the separate filmography article can have a more complete list with any notes that are of particular interest to people interested in Hicks's film career. I think that Cassianto made a good decision to separate the filmography from this article. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:34, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's not really a long filmography. I don't think that merging would really unbalance the article.--Michig (talk) 07:06, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree. What happens if someone wanted to take the list to WP:FLC in the future? Some of the films are mentioned in the main article, so having this list there would be redundent and repetitive. -- CassiantoTalk 00:56, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No. Two very good arguments above as to why not. Personally I would prefer the filmography to be widened into a listing of all professional appearances (stage and screen), which would certainly be a stand alone and heavyweight list in its own right. - SchroCat (talk) 03:22, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think that would be a good idea, and one I would be happy to undertake in the not to distant future. -- CassiantoTalk 10:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Memoirs[edit]

There are six volumes of memoirs listed here. Any consensus about their quality or significance? Valetude (talk) 23:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have been the main contributor to this article. I don't believe that any other Wikipedians have done substantial research on Hicks. When I was doing the research on Hicks and the Terrisses in 2006, I remember seeing various references to all of these memoirs in contemporary sources and more modern ones, but I don't think there's any source out there that compares them. He certainly wrote all of them, and if someone were going to write a book about him today, they would have to read and discuss all of them. If you are implying that we should delete one or more of them from the article, I oppose such an idea. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:07, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No - just the opposite. I think it would add interest to feature and evaluate them in the main text. (I remember enjoying Night Lights.) Valetude (talk) 09:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have not read them, but I have read some short excerpts from some of them. Hicks was an engaging writer, so if you went to the trouble of obtaining one or more of these, I think you would find it a breezy and fun read. I believe that "Me and My Missus" has a lot of good anecdotes about the couple, their friends and the theatre industry of the day. -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Seymour Hicks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]