Talk:Speechless (Michael Jackson song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cavie78 (talk) 10:13, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): (yes):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): (citations to reliable sources): (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Good work Pyrrhus, the article is well written and comprehensive, in many ways the perfect GA song article. I have a small number of minor concerns so I'll put the article on hold for now until they're dealt with. Cavie78 (talk) 10:13, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

  1. "In the production of "Speechless", Jackson collaborated with musicians such as Jeremy Lubbock..." I think this could be worded better - I was unsure what you meant on first read through. Would suggest changing to something like "Jackson collaborated with musicians including Jeremy Lubbock ... during the production of "Speechless"."
  2. There should be alt text for the cover image.
  3. "Nikolas Markantonatos of The Daily Collegian in Massachusetts expressed that one could "nearly feel Jackson's energy bursting through the seams..." Expressed is the wrong word, change to "stated"? "suggested"?
  4. Suggest linking "digitally edited" to Digital audio editor and "mixed" to Audio mixing (recorded music) in the 'Writing and recording' section
  5. In my opinion it would be good to include the fact that the music clip features the track's chorus in the description so that users know what they're listening to.
  • Thanks for taking the time to review the article. I believe I have addressed all of your concerns. Thanks, Pyrrhus16 14:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent, have now promoted! Cavie78 (talk) 14:17, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]