This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brighton, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BrightonWikipedia:WikiProject BrightonTemplate:WikiProject BrightonBrighton articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pipe Organ, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pipe Organ on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pipe OrganWikipedia:WikiProject Pipe OrganTemplate:WikiProject Pipe OrganPipe organ articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article states that the closure of the chirch is "unlikely to happen" due to local support. Sources of mine, very close to the church suggest that it is now almost definately going to happen, "When?" being a more pertinent question that "Whether?". However, firm sources for this are difficult to find. I will see what I can do and update ther article when I find some. Fork me (talk) 12:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What does a subterranean river have to do with the church's possible/likely closure? Circeus (talk) 16:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm; good question. I hadn't noticed that bit when editing earlier today! Must be a longstanding uncited sentence. Carder (Encyclopaedia of Brighton) notes that the Wellesbourne has been culverted since 1828, so subsidence sounds improbable. I'll look around for sources, but will remove that sentence for the time being. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 17:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
