Talk:The Hiding Place (biography)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Christianity: Charismatic Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Charismatic Christianity.

Untitled[edit]

Is it just me, or are classic novels that aren't science fiction or fantasy ignored to some extent on Wikipedia? --71.38.240.192 03:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but 'The hiding place' isn't a novel, classic or otherwise. It's an autobiography. 31.49.9.136 (talk) 19:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Books people feel passionate about are the ones that have the best articles. Unfortunately, not everyone feels passionate about nonfiction. Bkatcher 05:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's the problem with Wikipedia. There's a bias in information. --71.38.240.192 07:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say a bias, just more interest in some subjects. Bkatcher 17:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tense[edit]

I've changed the plot summary to past tense. People might check for words I've missed. Bkatcher (talk) 15:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Needs Cleaning[edit]

Religious Themes[edit]

I've restored and slightly amended this section. This is because otherwise the article is simply a partial biography (besides the brief introduction) that may as well be assimilated into the Corrie ten Boom article than stand alone. It seems to me that the significance of the book must to some extent derive from the particular religious teachings that it promotes regarding the miraculous etc.R Bartholomew (talk) 08:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC) [noel.com] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.8.103.113 (talk) 16:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]