Talk:Tim Hortons/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2

Comments on GA review

I got here through the GA nominations page. The article is indeed quite good but some facts need referencing. Also, no decent article should have a separate trivia section. Either the content is relevant and should be added in the proper place or it is irrelevant and should be removed. The Homolka bit, for instance, could go in the canadian icon subsection. If it looks inappropriate there, then it should be deleted. Also, there is no need to be openly critical but the overall tone seemed a bit too close to what someone from the Tim Hortons' PR department would write. For now, I haven't passed or failed the article. Pascal.Tesson 05:59, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Just to follow up on my own comment from yesterday, I was expecting to see some discussion surrounding Dunkin' Donuts. At least in Quebec, it seems that the rise of Tim Hortons completely crushed them. By the way, once the few missing citations are added, I think this could go straight to featured article candidates. Pascal.Tesson 18:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Good Article

This article meets all of the Good Article criteria. It's well-written, thoroughly referenced, and makes good use of images. I'd encourage taking it toward Featured Article status; I don't think it's very far away. Shimeru 19:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

donut or doughnut?

Tim Hortons spells it donut. Additionally, donut is more common in Canada. Should the spelling be changed from "doughnut" to "donut"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.180.5.239 (talk) 01:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC).

Please read the archived discussion page. This very question was debated quite recently with no definite consensus either way, and I don't know how much appetite anybody has right now for reopening it so soon. I have no strong feelings either way (I voted "don't really care as long as we're consistent" in the original discussion), but I will say that we're not necessarily bound to use "donut" just because Tim Hortons does; we follow Wikipedia's internal style guidelines, not external corporate style preferences. Bearcat 23:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
i do not think donut is the moer common spelling anyway. SECProto 03:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
The issue isn't really commonness of the spelling, but whether the article should be in Canadian English, which prefers Doughnut, or Tim Hortons English which prefers Donut. The MOS is surprisingly vague about this ... WilyD 14:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
I agree that that is the real issue, but i was just questioning the OP, who considered that donut is the canadian english spelling (saying donut is more common in canada implies that donut is the canadian english spelling.) SECProto 14:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
OP? I am under the impression (though I don't have one handy) that the Canadian Oxford Dictionary prefers Doughnut. If it preferred Donut, I'm fairly sure there'd be no contraversy. WilyD 14:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
The Canadian Oxford has doughnut as the main spelling, with donut as a "North American variant". I don't know that it's a question of doughnut being the Canadian spelling, however -- in the archived discussion, Bearcat's google search uncovered plenty of Canadian and American uses of both doughnut and donut. I don't feel terribly strongly about it either way, as long as the article is consistent, sticks with one and we avoid any more back-and-forth unilateral wholesale switches of the spelling. I guess I lean towards doughnut, if I had to pick one, because:

(a) The main Wikipedia article on the generic product spells it doughnut;

(b) The Canadian Oxford appears to prefer the doughnut spelling; and

(c) We are not bound by Tim Hortons' corporate spelling choices, so the fact that their signs say "donut" is not determinative.

But that's just my two cents. Skeezix1000 16:11, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm definitely on the doughtnut side of this argument. I was simply questioning the original poster, the unsigned person, who said "Additionally, donut is more common in Canada." I said that i thought doughnut is more common. we all seem to be agreeing yet still arguing :) SECProto 16:46, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
As Canadian Oxford prefers Doughnut as more common in Canada, without another reference I think we all have to accept it as so, per various policies. That said, we aren't 'required to spell it donut just because it's spelt that way by Tim Hortons, but that certainly is a valid motivation for spelling it that way. The article should be consistant, undoubtedly (again, I hope this is undisputed). I personally think the MOS implies (but does not state explicitly) that donut should be the prefered spelling here, on similar grounds to the which dialect of english? question. WilyD 17:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Wily, not sure what you mean by that last sentence. Skeezix1000 17:23, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Per the manual of style articles should use the relevent national variety of english where generic alternatives cannot be found. It seems fairly obvious to me that subnational entities with distinct english dialects should also use that dialect (i.e. the article Happy Valley-Goose Bay should be written in Newfoundland English, not Canadian English. From this I extrapolate as implicit the idea that in general, an article about anything should use that thing's preferred variety of English. From this I conclud this article should use Tim Hortons' preferred spelling of Donut - what I somewhat jokingly have called Tim Hortons English WilyD 18:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

I would guess that The Canadian Oxford is probably wrong about this, this is one of those American spellings that Canadians use too, and the Canadian Oxford is unaware of this. Who in Canada spells it "Doughnut"? (Talk amongst yourselves, I'll give you a topic, a doughnut is neither dough, nor a nut. Discuss.) But lacking sources to back me up, I guess "doughnut" it is. Spebudmak 07:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

  • I was taught that "donut" was the quick way to write it, much like "drive thru". I think Timmy's has made "donut" the preferred spelling amongst normal people, but Canadian style guides tend to prefer "doughnut". --BranER

Ummm... Tim Horton's signage in every Canadian city I've been to spells it "donut", so I say the Tim's spelling should be used in this article but that's just my two cents. newsong 15:51, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

  • All Tim Hortons stores across Canada and the United States use DONUT on their signage and labels. I'm Canadian and I don't know anyone who spells it "doughnut". DONUT ... that's the way Tim Hortons spells it, and this is the article for Tim Hortons, so it needs to be changed.

http://www.timhortons.com/en/menu/menu_donuts.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hozombel (talk • contribs) 20:11, August 24, 2007 (UTC)

Store #3000

I added the information for store #3000, but there is no definite source yet - it just opened today. I imagine the source for the other milestone stores will suffice once it's updated by the company. --Varco 19:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

According to their store list of 7-DEC-2006, there are 2,517 stores ___currently operating___ in Canada and 310 in the US for a total of 2,827 stores. One of these might have been store #3000, but again, this doesn't mean that there are 3,000 stores in their chain.

If you would like a copy of this store list, so that you can verify my numbers, please leave a message here with your contact info and I will send it to you.

I am reverting to the previous version. This is not a list of currently operating stores. It is taken directly from their history, which seems to have been removed from the FAQ page since I added the information (their whole site is being revamped, so it isn't very surprising). The list is still available here, and I have updated the source in the article: [1].
The store is #3000. If there's a "citation needed" tag, don't delete it because nobody has yet found a source; that's the point of the tag. I put that there in hopes of a better source than me going and taking a picture of the sign that says "Tim Hortons #3000," but if it is absolutely necessary, I will.
P.S. Please register and sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~)
--Varco 05:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Horton-apostrophe-s

Is it "Tim Hortons" or "TIm Horton's"? The article currently uses both. It should stick to one. For what it's worth, the company spells it without the apostrophe. 68.162.117.236 03:27, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Despite the fact that I protest it in daily use due to the grammatical horror, it should probably be "Tim Hortons;" that's the official name of the company. As an interesting side note, the Firefox spell checker suggests "Horton's" in place of "Hortons"--Varco 05:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
This sort of thing particularly annoys me when it's coming from multi-million dollar companies (Wegmans, Caesars Palace, etc). Couldn't they find one guy in marketing that knows how to read and write English? Even so, it's not Wikipedia's job to correct their mistakes. If that's the company's official name, that's what we should call them. --24.58.14.1 23:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
For what it's worth, I think there are legal reasons, e.g. difficulties in trademarking names of real people. — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 22:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Wake up and smell the coffee: Because of French-language sign laws in the province of Quebec, Tim Hortons is spelled without an apostrophe to standardize signage across the chain. Canadian Tim Hortons outlets feature bilingual menus and cups. The chain's ubiquitous coffee cups proclaim the company motto "Always Fresh" on one side and "Toujours Frais" on the opposite side. Obligatory warnings about the injury potential of hot coffee are also printed in English and French.[2]Toddsschneider (talk) 21:03, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

History of Hortons

The Tim Horton chain began as a burger joint. It was suggested, by Joyce I believe, to change over to a coffee shop, as the lucrative business of all the steelworkers starting or ending their shifts would pay off better than those going for lunch or dinner there. (the original location on Ottawa street is relatively close to Stelco, Dofacso, and National Steel Car). Can't find a source to back this up currently but I think it's a pretty well known fact by those who live in Hamilton 216.223.145.145 17:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Can anyone clear it up but there was a Tim Horton Coffee Shop built in North Bay, Ontario in the late 50s. The First built as a chain was the one mentioned in the article in 1964 in Hamilton. 24.235.216.83 17:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Number of stores

Someone keeps adding a site called findbyclick.com as a "reference." There are two problems with this: the site itself does not cite a reliable source... it links to a text file that appears to be compiled by the owners of the site, with a note saying that you can purchase the database of locations from the site. This is the third time somebody has added it and had it reverted. --Varco 04:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


The 'text file', mentioned by Varco, and available at http://www.findbyclick.com/stats/data/TimHortons_World_JAN2007.zip has been edited to clearly state its source:

"This database was obtained from Tim Hortons official locator service (http://web.sa.mapquest.com/timhortons) and corrected/enhanced by the FindByClick community of volunteers ( http://www.findbyclick.com/community/ )"

(We also communicate with Tim Hortons directly concerning any omissions / errors we encounter with their database, which eventually gets loaded back into their database.)

Sorry about this omission. I hope that with this correction, our source stands as the most accurate and precise count of Tim Hortons stores currently available.

As well, I'd like to add that www.findbyclick.com/stats provides a number of other statistics, presented in both map and tabular formats. All are derived from sources referenced at the bottom of the page. 

 Kmacd 14:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


I found a few errors in the title of the '# Tim Hortons stores' map I just uploaded. Will replace tomorrow. I didn't roll back as the primary content (ie. shading of provinces / states on the map plus the legend) is correct and as it stands should be an improvement over the old map that was there.

Could someone else comment on this whole issue? I understand the intentions are good, but it seems to border on self-promotion. --Varco 01:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
I also wonder about the accuracy of the site... I just checked my area and found one of the stores I frequent was not there. Another spot had a store that doesn't exist (and never did). --Varco 14:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


I can tell you that the find by click map is wrong. Knowing people inside the company, there are over 200 stores in Halifax Region alone. Revert to the old map that someone had made for the site. The find by click map is not accurate or reliable. --74.104.48.172 02:44, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

What is TDL Group

Well, What is it? You don't say! The legal name of Tim Hortons on that ticker symbol is "Tim Hortons, Inc." I work for a Tim-Horton's location and I do NOT know who or what TDL Group is. We have some packages which say "Made for The TDL Group, Ltd." and "Made for The TDL Group Corp.". A lot of our boxes say things like TDL 31234 for part number, and there is a sign in our lobby which says "bla bla bla operated under license from T.H.D. Donut (Delaware), Inc. The Franchise Information Report is mailed to "The T.H.D. Group, LLC." This companies address is in Dublin, Ohio. I might add, who is T.H.D. Group, LLC and Who is T.H.D. Donut Delaware Inc?

Obviously The TDL Group is important. But WHAT is it? And I dont think that mentioning it without warning in the middle of the article makes this a "Good Article". Johnzw 03:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I'd put in an explainer on it some time ago that was apparently removed in an article reorganization. I've readded a similar disclaimer. Basically, TDL was Tim's publicly-traded parent company prior to the Wendy's merger. — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 16:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Tim Dounut Limited Group Ltd. is the company of Tim Hortons, which is just a trading name. TDL is who you work for and who owns all of the stores. TDL is in turn owned publicly. Dale-DCX 17:58, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Elderly lady story

"In April 2007, Tim Hortons came under fire when an elderly customer injured himself on a broken knife end left in a turkey bacon sandwich. Although the employee producing the sandwich recognized that the knife was broken and the end was missing, he did not report the incident or take action before the customer consumed the sandwich. Tim Hortons claims no wrong doing and is pending investigation into the matter."

I can't locate any news items for this. I propose that it be deleted if no one else can either. newsong 15:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Muffins to the infobox

I added muffins to the infobox. I'm eating one now infact, and it's delicious.

Myden 14:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Not an unreasonable comment or addition, although that second statement is factually inexact. I cannot for the life of me understand how Tim Horton's knows how to make everything well except muffins, which they do terribly. WilyD 14:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

tsk tsk. Cease this original muffin research at once! :P heqs ·:. 07:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Double-double

This page persists in asserting that Tims popularized the term double-double, but does not provide a citation to prove it (the current citation shows only that it's in the OED). This term was popular before Tims existed. So I added a fact tag. Approximate Vicinity (talk) 18:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

In fact, the article cited seems to imply that the term is not associated with Tims. Approximate Vicinity (talk) 18:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
I don't know that "this page" persists in making this assertion, so much as some editors do. The double-double claim has been removed from the article a number of times, and keeps on finding its way back into the article. I agree with you, by the way, that it doesn't belong in the article. Skeezix1000 (talk) 18:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Wendy's/American-owned

Although the article makes it clear that Tim Horton's was a Canadian company, it doesn't state that since its merger with Wendy's it has been an America-owned corporation, that is owned by Wendy's International Inc. This may not be a major issue but for a number of Canadians it is an important point. Many Canadians are also unaware that Tim Horton's is American. I don't have any reliable evidence of the latter just casual conversation with people, general discussions on the internet, and a some news reports I saw on tv about Tim Horton's in Afghanistan where cutomers interviewed were supportive, calling it such things as a "Canadian company" or "Canadian icon." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.47.117 (talk) 12:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, Wendy's did sell all of their stocks and TDL's headquarters are located in Canada, so it is a Canadian publicly traded company. cncxbox 04:29, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
As noted, Wendy's sold Tim Hortons some time ago. In any event, in the age of globalization, the ownership of the shares of a corporation does not necessarily denote the nationality of a company. Some companies that we think of as being synonymous with the U.S., France or Japan, for example, are often widely held by institutional shareholders across the globe, such that "most" of the company is actually owned by "foreigners". Does that mean the "nationality" of the company changes? Not necessarily. What happens if a foreign firm buys the company and takes it private? Does the nationality of the company change every time it changes hands? Possibly, but maybe not. Even when Wendy's did own all of Tims, its headquarters and the vast majority of its operations and sales were in Canada. Ownership is not the sole indicia of corporate nationality, and arguably not the most important indicia, so it's debatable whether Tim's could be said to have been "American" even when Wendy's owned it. The answer is not clear cut. Skeezix1000 (talk) 11:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
"Indicia". Thats an interesting word. Also, Tim Hortons was founded in Canada by Canadians. Tim Hortons is a Canadian company, through and through. 72.136.137.24 (talk) 21:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Roll Up The Rim

Is their any evidence to suggest that Quebec receives more favourable odds of winning compared to other provinces? This is of, in addition to what's been in the papers recents (and on CBC) suggesting that this might be the case. If so, it should be in the article. Canking (talk) 22:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Ramblings of a Deranged Canadian

The criticism section is waaaayyyyy too much against the company. Remember NPOV!!! Also,The image galklery at the bottom is too small to be included. They should be deleted, or the section should be expanded. 99.224.132.115 (talk) 19:02, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

If the company is not being a good corporate citizen I see no problem with a lengthy criticism section. There is a completely separate article for Criticism of Wal-Mart! As long as the text is sourced and referenced, it can stay. Suttungr (talk) 23:34, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't think many canadians care how Tim Hortons makes their coffee; many of us would sell our souls for just one cup! 72.136.137.24 (talk) 21:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

New Tim's Era

I propose that we should include up to date information about where the donuts are actually made and how they are able to supply over 3000 stores.

It could be linked to the criticism section, regarding the frozen bakery items that are reheated in store.

Let me know what you think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarb17 (talk • contribs) 04:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Personally I'd find it hard to believe that they reheat their donuts. Wouldn't they get all soggy and stuff? Especially with Boston Cream donuts? 72.136.137.24 (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Bot report : Found duplicate references !

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

  • "rim2" :
    • "Finally! A Rimroller!!", Winnipeg Free Press, [[March 11]] [[2007]] [http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/subscriber/columnists/d_speirs/story/3906909p-4518566c.html]
    • "Finders, keepers: Tim Hortons puts a lid on cup contest controversy", Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, [[April 19]] [[2006]] [http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2006/04/19/hortons-cup-060419.html]

DumZiBoT (talk) 20:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Mention nicotine myth?

Would it be noteworthy to mention that many rumors have circulated about nicotine and MSG being added to Tim's coffee[3], but that these have been proven false (CBC Disclosure program) and now it is even addressed in the FAQ on Tim Horton's official website[4]. brandon.macuser (talk) 01:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

President

The Tim Horton's Website says the President and CEO is Don Schroeder, this article goes against that.24.65.95.239 (talk) 02:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Tim Hortons/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of November 10, 2008, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

The issues:

1) The lead does not satisfy WP:LEAD. It is too short and should be expanded to include 3-4 paragraphs.

2) The are numerous {{cn}} tags in the article that should be dealt with.

3) The reflist contains 12 dead weblinks. In addition many refs lack publisher/author/title. They should be fixed.

4) The article contains lots of POV statements that should be removed. For example: Tim Hortons has one of the most successful marketing operations in Canada. With powerful and effective branding, the store has established itself in the top class of fast-food restaurants in Canada or The ubiquity of Tim Hortons, through both effective marketing and the wide expansion of its outlets, makes it a prominent feature of Canadian life. Such statements should be avoided because they are of little value for readers, are uncitable and unecyclopedic.

Ruslik (talk) 09:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

I noticed that the lead was expanded. Is anybody going to add references and format them? Ruslik (talk) 19:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
After more than two the article still does not meet all GA criteria so I will delist it. After my concerns are addressed the article can be nominated to WP:GAN. Ruslik (talk) 14:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Donut Reheating

It's true, the donuts at Tim's are frozen then reheated at the store. I know this because I am a former employee. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.158.53.129 (talk) 23:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


What about Jim Charade?

According to the Globe and Mail obituary ( http://v1.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090813.OBCHARADE13ART2152//TPStory/Obituaries Obituary August 13, 2009 Jim Charade, the Unknown Founder), Jim Charade should have a mention in this article for getting Horton interested in donuts in the first place. Also, the book by Douglas Hunter "Open Ice: The Tim Horton Story", Viking, 1994 ISBN 0670854050 might be a useful reference. --Wtshymanski (talk) 01:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey, also look for "The donut: a Canadian history By Steve Penfold", online at http://books.google.ca/books?id=dBjWeUa5pqEC&pg=PA53&lpg=PA53&dq=jim+charade&source=bl&ots=SLRqjYJF8O&sig=1fTLr2HWlYjsHoS5XhruWTeQa8w&hl=en&ei=pAqGStrXIZORtgfT_9jnDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6#v=onepage&q=jim%20charade&f=false --Wtshymanski (talk) 01:11, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Ice Cream?

Tim's does not serve ice cream and it should be removed from the products list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.158.53.129 (talk) 23:54, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

They do. 9 locations in Canada serve Cold Stone Ice Cream. --99.249.72.31 (talk) 01:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

How Many Worldwide Locations?

There are stores outside of North America but their number isn't listed.

There are only two locations currently outside North America - One in Ireland on Millennium Parkway and one at CFB Kandahar in Afghanistan.--99.249.72.31 (talk) 01:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Partnership with Cold Stone Creamery

why isn't it addressed in the article ? would a photo of a tim hortons with its original logo,sign adjusted to include cold stone creamery in its branding be accepted ? There are 2 tim hortons in Halifax alone (quinpool road and bedford) which have combined with the ice cream store. (it isn't like the wendy's partnership, the donut and ice cream aspects of the store have been fused together, workers at the locations are responsible for serving both types of products.Grmike (talk) 20:09, 19 April 2010 (UTC)grmike

It is treated at Tim Hortons#Partnership with Tim Hortons. If you own the photograph and are willing to release it under a suitably free license, upload it to commons:commons:Upload. –xenotalk 20:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

"Muffin" ?

Under products list, it says "muffin", when everything else is pluralized. (E.g. Sandwiches, cookies...) Shouldn't it be too? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.103.231.6 (talk) 22:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Testing cafe/bake shop in the US in 2010

The main article mentions testing a new cafe/bake shop in at least 10 existing US locations that presumably is to happen after March 2010. Have any of these been built, and if so where are they and what are they called? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.10.130.47 (talk) 17:26, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Double double

If you search for "double double" in Wikipedia you will find "Tim Hortons Double Double" along with a definition. However, I was just watching an episode of Dragnet 1970 where Officer Gannon had a coffee he called a "double double" and the coffee cup actually had the words "double double" written on it with magic marker.

Since this show is based in Los Angeles, it seems this term is not strictly associated with Tim Hortons. I suggest that double double be unassociated with Tim Hortons since the term does not solely exist within the confines of Tim Hortons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.227.196 (talk) 22:47, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

I would agree and disagree. I've gotten a "double double" at McDonalds here in Southern Ontario and was understood just fine. That said, Tim Hortons is what is commonly associated with the double double. I think it's important to include here for that reason. Celynn (talk) 20:19, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Marketing section

If you read over the Marketing section, much of it is written with a promotional or advertising tone, and although there are quite a few references, they are used to help with promoting the company. For instance, "Tim Hortons has one of the most successful marketing operations in Canada, approaching the level of a symbol of national identity. With powerful and effective branding, the store has established itself in the top class of fast-food restaurants in Canada.", or "The Roll Up the Rim campaign was first held in 1986[39] and has grown to become a highly anticipated event for Tim Hortons customers." This is highly against Wikipedia standards and most of this section should be rephrased to only remove such promotional tones. Several sentences with such tone actually references the company's webpage. Nitroblu (talk) 20:00, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

I've already added the primary sources and advert templates. I've contemplated replacing the advert template with the peacock template. If anyone feels this is more appropriate than the advert template, please feel free to update. Nitroblu (talk) 20:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Roll Up the Rim dates

The article mentions that the Roll Up the Rim promotion takes place every March, though if I remember correctly (and according to this source) it started this year on February 20th. Are the dates the same every year? If not, we should provide a list of dates. If so, the specific dates should be listed in the article, not just "every March". Additionally, there are some facts about Roll Up the Rim in the source I mentioned which aren't in the article. I'll add them in when I have more time unless someone gets to it first. —Entropy (T/C) 22:15, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Locations per province?

Does anybody know or have the information about exactly how many Tim Hortons are in each province? I can't seem to find the info. I really need this by the way.

Laisinteresting (talk) 21:31, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

See if this gives you any joy. –xenotalk 21:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

The above noted link is broken if anyone comes upon it. Cmurdock1955 (talk) 12:43, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Question

Any reason it's "Tim Hortons" rather than "Tim Horton's?" 70.88.213.74 (talk) 18:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Did you read the first sentence of the history section? (See also last paragraph of its first section, 'Tim Horton and Ron Joyce') For the record, ref 18 indicates that "Because of French-language sign laws in the province of Quebec, Tim Hortons is spelled without an apostrophe to standardize signage across the chain." Mindmatrix 19:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Store closures

I was wondering if anyone was aware of the fact, that Tim Hortons has closed 34 stores in Connecticut and Rhode Island. If anyone care's to know that fact or not. The management of the Tim Horton chain without warning closed these stores and left 720 employee's unemployed and left scratching their heads wondering what happened.

Cmurdock1955 (talk) 11:43, 6 April 2013 Link label

This article could use a section about franchises, their relationship to the parent company, and so forth. Mindmatrix 17:30, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Restaurants or Stores?

The article begins by describing the company as a restaurant chain, but later it begins to deal with stores. A store, of course, is not a restaurant. This needs to be straightened out. 24.19.59.161 (talk) 02:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Look closely at the definition of "fast casual restaurant" by its link in the first sentence of the article. Tim Horton's is both a store and a fast casual restaurant by this definition. As additional contradiction to your complaint, I offer Starbucks as example: it serves food, and would thus be also considered a "fast casual restaurant," but I would dare to say most would refer to Starbucks' locations as "stores." I maintain your semantic complaint is invalid, and no editing necessary apropos this point.IcehouseCover (talk) 21:02, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Pop culture

Shouldn't there be a mention in pop culture section - ie in the movie One Week, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.218.83 (talk) 03:04, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

As a BRITON I'd never heard of Tim Horton's until coming across references to it in the track titles of solo works by Godspeed You! Black Emperor drummer Aidan Girt: "Encounter With Haile Selassie's Grandson In A Mississauga Tim Horton's", "It's Your Duty As A Canadian To Go To Tim Horton's 5 Times A Day", "Taliban Horton Overnight Price Doubling" and "Tim Horton’s As A Gateway Drug To The Canadian Army". Clearly he feels quite strongly about Tim Horton's, and I'm now tempted to visit Canada on my holibobs this year :-) Mr Larrington (talk) 18:14, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tim Hortons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tim Hortons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:41, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Tim Hortons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Controversy section

Controvery sections are inherently POV and COATRACKish. The text that is verifiable needs to be incorporated into the rest of the article. And a photo of some trash presented as a "controversy" related to the subject of this article is WP:UNDUE, given that every single fast-food restaurant has a similar issue and it's not unique to this one at all. Kindzmarauli (talk) 21:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Neat - I've been working on the page assuming the tag was added because someone thought the marketing section was PRish, or something along those lines. I agree with you on the controversy section - earlier I moved the sections to more relevant places. They still have "criticism" and "controversy" in the headings, now, which I don't feel is horrible but still not optimal considering WP:CRIT. Since the marketing section isn't hated, I might get rid of those and try and blend out the POV-forking without changing the text much. Up for thoughts. Benji the Pen (talk) 15:02, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Ok. Sections absorbed. Will remove tag on those grounds. Don't mind if it is re-added, page is far from perfect, sourcing still mostly unchecked. Benji the Pen (talk) 16:02, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Tim Hortons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:37, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Tim Hortons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Tim Hortons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Tim Hortons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Headquarters

"This headquarters was a relic of the former merger with Wendy's, which is also based in Dublin.[citation needed]"

Is the "citation needed" looking for citation that Wendy's is HQed in Dublin (Ohio), or that Tim's location there was a relic of being owned by Wendy's? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:ca00:129:6ebb:62c4:274a:9a8b:ccfc (talk) 14:43, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Videos for EL section?

WhisperToMe (talk) 08:04, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Founding consistency

Bon Jour. An infobox states that the company was founded in 1964 by Tim Horton and Ron Joyce, but the intro states that Jim Charade was co-founder:

"The company was founded in 1964 in Hamilton, Ontario, by Canadian hockey player Tim Horton... and Jim Charade... after an initial venture in hamburger restaurants. In 1967, Horton partnered with investor Ron Joyce".

At first, I thought it might be a charade, but then saw he was a Vachon Inc. vet. Accordingly, I changed the infobox, and put a book source in the main article. Merci, RFT42 (talk) 23:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tim_Hortons/Archive_2&oldid=1170065340"