Talk:Tota pulchra es (Bruckner)

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical music: Compositions

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Discography[edit]

Thank you for drafting the page of this motet of the composer.

For the discography, a critical review of the available performances of Bruckner's Tota pulchra es has been made by Hans Roelofs. See Critical review of about 40 recordings of Tota pulchra es. According to Roelofs, the better recordings are those by Best, Böck, Hausmann, Jochum, Mayrhofer, Ortner, Schäfer and Zanotelli. --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 07:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not in "Cecilian style"[edit]

Bruckner has composed this antiphon in Phrygian mode, not in "Cecilian style". The Phrygian mode is one of the modes used by the Cecilian movement. However, Bruckner's Tota pulchra es does not follow other requirements of the Cecilian movement (a cappella, etc.). --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 15:57, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]