Talk:Touched: The Jerry Sandusky Story

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Items needed[edit]

I think this article is a candidate for AfD, unless you can establish notability before the whole Jerry Sandusky sex abuse scandal broke.

This would include articles published around the time the book was published (use Lexis-Nexis or Newsbank to find citations), citations in media prior to November 2011 when Sandusky was charged, or other reviews that provide critical commentary per WP:NB and not just a rehash of the double entendre or other aspects, which are all Sandusky-scandal related. Calwatch (talk) 07:53, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's definitely a point about questionable notability here, but I don't see why the book couldn't become notable for the first time in November 2011. Jweiss11 (talk) 05:14, 23 November 2011 (UTC)s[reply]
The article now has references to and quotes from reviews published shortly after its publication. This should be persuasive evidence of notability. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:35, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Touched: The Jerry Sandusky Story. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]