Talk:Transit Authority of River City

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleTransit Authority of River City was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 15, 2009Good article nomineeListed
February 24, 2017Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 14, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in addition to its bus services, Louisville's Transit Authority of River City operates diesel-powered, rubber-tired trolleys to service downtown hotel and shopping districts?
Current status: Delisted good article

Note to GA reviewer[edit]

Due to the nature of this topic, all the sources are not freely available. I have access to them though through archives and can e-mail you the articles if you need them to review this article. Just leave a note here for me. --Chiliad22 (talk) 01:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Hello I am robert an actual louisville resident I get my facts from the ridetarc website we actually do have 32 wifi enabled buses and the 12 new buses were put on the road last week feel free to take a pic and add it here thank you REMCNAIR87 Remcnair87 (talk) 13:33, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whether we are residents or not (I am), it's best to add citations for facts added to the article. It's also best not to leave messes for others to clean up (why I had to revert before). If those things are not done, the "good article" status of this article may be put at risk. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When can I upload photos Remcnair87 (talk) 18:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you already are. But photos should be placed in the correct context, and in a manner that maintains aesthetic quality. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 22:54, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This time, I did a lot of cleanup instead of reverting, and I think more is necessary. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 00:16, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks stevietheman and I didn't mean to do that and talk to whoever barrelproof is and again I did not mean to do that I put a photo in the current fleet part of the page I am still a new wikipedian and I try to update where I can especially if the company garners a few new toys e.g.; buses the company in its integrity has been around for 40 years and I've been riding since childhood and I frequent their site it should only be allowed that locals update the Transit Authority of River City wiki page not outsiders because some of us locals tend to know more than an outsider would Remcnair87 (talk) 12:27, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Community reassessment[edit]

Transit Authority of River City[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result: Delist Consensus here is to delist. AIRcorn (talk) 10:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article has fallen into disrepair since it became a good article in 2009. It has seen a good deal of content expansion, but without appropriate citations to go with it. Significant amounts of the new content may be WP:OR. Also, the lead goes into too much detail (this may be much more easily fixed than other issues). I am asking for community reassessment because I am a major contributor to the article, and the major contributor who created much of the new content may object to me making a delist decision alone. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 13:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delist. Transit Authority of River City does not presently fulfill the following GA Criteria:

  • 1B: MOS:LEAD/lead is too detailed, much of this content belongs in the main body of the article if it can be sourced.
  • 2B & 2C: original research everywhere - Current bus fleet section:unreferenced. First paragraph in "Fleet" section, many other individual statements: No references.
  • 3A: Too much of the stated information & too many of the references are dated - this article is stuck in a 1988/1992/1994/2003/2005/2006/2008 time warp so how can it even begin to address the main and present aspects of the subject?

Shearonink (talk) 18:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Transit Authority of River City. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Transit Authority of River City. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add in the new Dixie highway project? Sources cam be found at www.Louisvilleky.gov R.E. McNair (talk) 06:57, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:06, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Transit_Authority_of_River_City&oldid=1210750549"