Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Transit Authority of River City/1

Transit Authority of River City[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delist Consensus here is to delist. AIRcorn (talk) 10:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article has fallen into disrepair since it became a good article in 2009. It has seen a good deal of content expansion, but without appropriate citations to go with it. Significant amounts of the new content may be WP:OR. Also, the lead goes into too much detail (this may be much more easily fixed than other issues). I am asking for community reassessment because I am a major contributor to the article, and the major contributor who created much of the new content may object to me making a delist decision alone. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 13:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delist. Transit Authority of River City does not presently fulfill the following GA Criteria:

1B: MOS:LEAD/lead is too detailed, much of this content belongs in the main body of the article if it can be sourced.
2B & 2C: original research everywhere - Current bus fleet section:unreferenced. First paragraph in "Fleet" section, many other individual statements: No references.
3A: Too much of the stated information & too many of the references are dated - this article is stuck in a 1988/1992/1994/2003/2005/2006/2008 time warp so how can it even begin to address the main and present aspects of the subject?

Shearonink (talk) 18:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]