Talk:United States World War I Centennial Commission

United States: District of Columbia / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Memorials / North America / United States / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military memorials and cemeteries task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it is intended to be a basic overview/brief info about a government commission. The page does not solicit viewers for donations, or support of any kind. If there is any language that is ambiguous/cause for concern, please tell me how I can edit that so it is not an issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ww1cc (talk • contribs)

@Ww1cc: I'm glad to see that the article's promotional content is gone. However, there are still many things wrong with the article:

It does not meet Wikipedia's quality standards. See WIAA for more information.
It does not credibly indicate why or how it's subject is important or significant.

Please address these issues, and this article may or may not be worthy of inclusion. If you have any additional comments, please feel free to respond. Heat Is Cool 00:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have begun making changes per your feedback. Am I still missing anything/need to address any issues? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ww1cc (talk • contribs) 16:48, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changes[edit]

I recently made some changes that were seen as "non-constructive" as posted on my talk page. The changes were being added gradually and I was not done with the article by the time it was reverted. I cleaned up content changing clusters of texts that the commissioner section appeared as and creating them into a box chart, adding a appointed by section, with the names of notable figures and organizations the appointed them. I also did other clean up work to make the page more readable and added content. I'm hoping that the revert was a mistake. Thelosthistorian (talk) 14:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]