Talk:Victor Premasagar

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 December 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Christianity in India.

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Victor Premasagar is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

cleanup required[edit]

This article still needs more cleaning up. It needs better wikifying, and some sections are difficult to follow.

Is the long list of external links valuable? Could it be trimmed to a few high-value links, or grouped to help a reader decide which ones to follow? --Scott Davis ^Talk 07:35, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this article really useful?[edit]

Wikipedia is *not* an instrument of publicity (and propaganda?). I happen to be from the place where this gentleman is from, and I haven't heard of him. I strongly urge the editors to purge this meaningless article. If this sort of a thing goes on, you'll have every other guy putting up his 'profile' on Wikipedia. This is *not* orkut! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.254.232.182 (talk) 21:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Usefulness of this article[edit]

None hears of the 'instruments' behind the Church establishments. St.George's Grammar School, Wesley College and other institutions in the twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad were established by the Church of South India and had existed since the last two centuries. Rakesh Sharma was a product of St.George's Grammar School. Dr. Victor Premasagar was Bishop-in-Medak, of the Church of South India Asia's largest bishopric. The Queen of England, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II during her visit to Secunderabad in the eighties had celebrated her birthday in Secunderabad in Bolarum Church - the service was officiated by Dr. Premasagar.

One wonders why some unsigned person chose to remark on Priest's. Is is that priest's who render selfless service should not be focussed or brought to the limelight ?. Preethi Evangeline 16:15, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article is worty of inclussion but it needs a complete rewrite. -- SECisek (talk) 14:21, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts[edit]

When you revert, are you not aware that you are omitting Honorary Titles and Academic Offices - that's for succession boxes.

As the the textual matter, you seem to be totally unaware that you are again omitting major textual matter.Pradeep 18:04, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The older version of the article violated numerous wikipedia policies - it read like an advertisment, used purple text, had CSI on the see line instead of denomination, etc. The re-worked version is an improvement on the version you keep restoring. What do you want in the article? Perhaps we can work out a NPOV here. -- SECisek 18:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of Wikipedia[edit]

This person is virtually unknown even in the place he is supposedly from. A quick straw poll among Wikipedia users from Andhra Pradesh or Medak would confirm this. If this gentleman is well-known in his diocese or congregation, good for them. Wikipedia is not an place for free publicity. If, as one Preethi Evangeline seems to suggest, they are interested in publicizing his apparent good works, please do so, but not through an *encyclopaedia*.