Talk:Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has serious problems[edit]

A single citation is all that is necessary for this article, because the entire thing is just a quote from the IAEA website on the added protocol.

It starts with a POV statement about "significant step forward" in nuclear liability coverage. This is not a fact, but a judgement by an agency which is in the business of promoting nuclear power. For people endangered by reactors near them, this treaty which limits the amount that nuclear utilities have to pay, may well be a significant step backwards.

Paxuscalta (talk) 11:27, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

note that this page is largely about the aqdded protocol, not about the 1963 original convention.

Link to the text of the Convention please!?[edit]

120.155.166.181 (talk) 11:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The US$5M limit is this per person or total or what?[edit]

120.155.166.181 (talk) 11:56, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with intro and tone of article[edit]

The article lacks a proper intro and has an overall tone issue and thus should be rewritten to conform to WP style/tone guidelines. Also needs citations as prev. mentioned on this talk page. --Cab88 (talk) 06:21, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]