Talk:Wrecking (Soviet Union)

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is work of art (Archipelago Gulag) is a reliable source?[edit]

--Dojarca (talk) 15:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A note at the beginning of the English translation of The Gulag Archipelago says: "In this book there are no fictitious persons, nor fictitious events. People and places are named with their own names."

The book has a lot of artistic metaphor and other poetic language, but it is a nonfiction book. --DavidCary (talk) 13:36, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't wreckingcome from russian word for a beetle[edit]

iirc college russian, wrecker in russian is the word for a siberian beetle that destroys wooden structures

File:GPU.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:GPU.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Solzh removed[edit]

Solzhenitsyn is not an expert, he got it wrong in hearsay, see ru:Мекк, Николай Карлович фон (more detailed than enwiki). In fact, this was a common ...er... problem of uneducated Soviet managers and workers, who were notorious at "improving the performance" of foreign machinery by overloading them beyond stated operational limits to improve throughput. Needless to say, this had led to wreckage of equipment. And needless to say that an expert such as von Meck could not have possibly come up with a crazy idea described by Solzh. I remember that in fact the opposite case happened at Dneproges construction when American engineers who were opposed to overburdening American excavators were charged with wrecking and landed in gulag. I was planning to write about this in WP, but got distracted, lost the refs, forgot the name of the American company, <sigh>... - Altenmann >talk 18:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]