Talk:XQD card

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lexar on on board with XQD[edit]

It was just the 11th of July 2012 that Lexar plan on releasing XQD cards by the end of 2012. http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/07/11/Lexar-announces-XQD-support-in-Q3-2012 AquaGeneral (talk) 14:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also Sony have just announced their line: http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/07/02/Sony-s-series-168-mb-s-XQD AquaGeneral (talk) 14:41, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some chart needed[edit]

Cards size comparison chart is needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.57.30.187 (talk) 12:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on XQD card. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on XQD card. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested edit - avoid confusing TB and TiB[edit]

Hello all: I suggest a correction: The link in "storage capabilities beyond 2 TB" points to the article on tebibyte.

It would be best to either state "storage capabilities beyond 2 TiB" and keep the link as is or keep "storage capabilities beyond 2 TB" and link to the article on terabyte. This should prevent adding more confusion between binary and decimal prefixes. I am not sure what change is best and I am not experimented enough with edits for attempting to do it myself. Could someone please take care of this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacques.999 (talkcontribs) 09:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]