Talk:You Are in Love

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 April 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

You Are in Love is currently a Songs good article nominee. Nominated by Brachy08 _(Talk) at 04:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.

Short description: 2015 promotional single by Taylor Swift

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 12 April 2024 by reviewer TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs).

Taylor Swift Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taylor Swift, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taylor Swift on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Taylor SwiftWikipedia:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTemplate:WikiProject Taylor SwiftTaylor Swift articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Demonstrating notability[edit]

Hey Brachy0008, skimming through the references in this draft, I'm hesitant to accept it due to the highly scattered coverage. I'm not seeing discussion of the subject in any individual sources beyond a couple of sentences, which is not significant coverage. Could you list the three sources that best demonstrate the subject's notability? —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

9, 10 and 22 are the best sources I could find. Brachy08 _(Talk) 03:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; I'm still a little on the fence about it, but I'll accept it based on the amount of encyclopedic content you've managed to extract from other sources. I'll leave the article in the new pages feed, so you should hopefully be getting a second opinion from another reviewer soon. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, citation 2 is currently a shortened footnote that does not point to a full citation. You might want to take a look at that! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:You Are in Love/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 04:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 17:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Hey, @Brachy08! I will be reviewing this article in a few days. What worries me about this process is the shortness of the article, but I will try to save it, I think it is worth it. Best, Santi (talk) 17:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing this article Brachy08 _(Talk) 00:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

Hey, @Brachy0008! I'm close to resuming the review. Before I can begin, I would like to know if the research paper is complete, to make the review a little easier due to the recent AfD nomination. Thank you. Santi (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]