Talk:You Are in Love/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 04:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 17:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Hey, @Brachy08! I will be reviewing this article in a few days. What worries me about this process is the shortness of the article, but I will try to save it, I think it is worth it. Best, Santi (talk) 17:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing this article Brachy08 _(Talk) 00:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

Hey, @Brachy0008! I'm close to resuming the review. Before I can begin, I would like to know if the research paper is complete, to make the review a little easier due to the recent AfD nomination. Thank you. Santi (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What research paper? tho i managed to add content from a book source Brachy08 _(Talk) 03:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't know. Heartfox said in the AfD that some sources are missing. It is only to know if such sources have already been obtained. Santi (talk) 04:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
we've got one source in. not sure about the others though. Brachy08 _(Talk) 04:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. These sources (this and this) maybe can be useful. Just maybe. Found with a cursory Google research, and I couldn't find more sources. So I would assume yes. Santi (talk) 05:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]