Template:Did you know nominations/Florence Wickham

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vincent60030 (talk) 18:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Florence Wickham

Created by T. E. Meeks (talk) and Gerda Arendt (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 10:39, 5 September 2020 (UTC).

  • Gerda Arendt The biggest problem that I see is that much of the article is sourced to an unreliable personal website that was made with Google Sites. This link shows that the owner is Paul Carosi, but I am unable to find any proof that he is a professional in the music field. Ancestry is not considered a reliable source because it can be edited by anyone. SL93 (talk) 02:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
  • The writings from Paul Carosi are actually acceptable. I will finish the review now. SL93 (talk) 02:52, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
  • The article is long enough and new enough. The article has no copyright violations. The hook is directly cited and A QPQ has completed. There is only one issue - Ancestry is an unreliable source. SL93 (talk) 02:55, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
    Thank you for looking deeper than had time for. Patience please. In memoriam. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
    • You're welcome. I was never impatient either. SL93 (talk) 09:37, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
      SL93, now I had time to look. The difference that site makes is a day and month for her marriage, - the person and the year are covered by other sources. Now how crucial is it if that date is reliable or not? If it matters we can remove it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
      • Gerda Arendt I would just have the article state the person/year and then source the information with a different source. SL93 (talk) 20:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
        done --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • This is ready. SL93 (talk) 22:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this, and did some editing to align with the sources on her birthdate. Please add page numbers for the book refs. Yoninah (talk) 21:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
    Sorry, I can't help with the book. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • @SL93: this has come up on other reviews and is not nitpicking; There is a reasonable expectation that an article—even a short one—that is to appear on the front page should appear to be complete... (Rule D7). You may bring this up at WT:DYK if you'd like. Yoninah (talk) 21:18, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Yoninah Great, but I believe it is nitpicking and I believe in Ignore All Rules also per it being a minor issue and a new editor. Hopefully the new editor adds the page numbers when they didn't participate in the DYK. SL93 (talk) 21:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Yoninah I saw that page numbers were added for everything except for the November 6 date. Maybe just remove the date? SL93 (talk) 23:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • @SL93: You could, or you could say what the source says. Footnote 6 says the winter season. Yoninah (talk) 23:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • @Yoninah: Ok. I think that part is done. SL93 (talk) 23:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Restoring my own tick per page numbers being added. Consensus on the DYK talk page is that page numbers aren’t required anyway. SL93 (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)