Template:Did you know nominations/Sri Lankan Christmas tree
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sri Lankan Christmas tree[edit]
Sri Lankan Christmas tree
- ... that the Sri Lankan Christmas tree (pictured) is claimed to be the world’s tallest artificial Christmas tree?
Created by AntanO (talk). Self-nominated at 04:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC).
This needs some minor work. Full review:
- Hook – hook is interesting and short enough, however, please remove the ellipses (...) after "tree" (see issue in citation, also)
- NPOV – article is NPOV
- Length – I get a character count of 1775, including spaces but excluding infobox and references, so that seems okay.
- Copyvio – Earwig returns "very unlikely"
- Citation – The source is immediately cited, however, Yahoo and Washington Post both say "claimed" and I'm not 100% sure ColomboPage is RS. Can the hook be changed so that it says "is claimed to be" instead of "is considered to be"?
- Image – none
- QPQ – done here: Template:Did you know nominations/Myth & Roid
- Newness – created December 26 so new enough
A very nice job on the article, AntanO. DarjeelingTea (talk) 06:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, DarjeelingTea for good review. I removed ellipses at the end of line. I will suggest/change hook, and consider to adding free image by tomorrow. --AntanO 06:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- @DarjeelingTea:, I made change as you suggested and did some edits, and also added an image too. Unfortunately, I had bad climate during capture the image. If it not suite, we can ignore the image. ColomboPage is RS and we could see many articles that use it as reference. --AntanO 02:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Wow that's a really wonderful image. I'm sorry, I didn't mean to suggest you needed to go take one, only that I wasn't reviewing for an image since there wasn't one here. Anyway, everything looks good. Great job, again, AntanO. DarjeelingTea (talk) 04:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- @DarjeelingTea:, I made change as you suggested and did some edits, and also added an image too. Unfortunately, I had bad climate during capture the image. If it not suite, we can ignore the image. ColomboPage is RS and we could see many articles that use it as reference. --AntanO 02:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you DarjeelingTea. Yes, you didn't mean to suggest for an image. I thought to have one :). --AntanO 05:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
I was going to promote this, but I see there are no references in the second paragraph, the important one with all the facts and figures. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you DarjeelingTea. Yes, you didn't mean to suggest for an image. I thought to have one :). --AntanO 05:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Done Updated. --AntanO 10:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. Sorry to be a nuisance, but why are the bars in the comparison graph all blue while the legend is multi-coloured - it looks odd. I also think you should supply a citation for the height of the last three structures mentioned. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- The bars are muted for now as I am planning major expansion. @Cwmhiraeth: --AntanO 08:44, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. Sorry to be a nuisance, but why are the bars in the comparison graph all blue while the legend is multi-coloured - it looks odd. I also think you should supply a citation for the height of the last three structures mentioned. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Replacing the tick. This is ready to be promoted now. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
