Template:Did you know nominations/Steindamm Church
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:42, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Steindamm Church[edit]
- ... that Steindamm Church was destroyed during the Siege of Königsberg and rebuilt in 1263?
Created/expanded by Olessi (talk). Nominated by Mifter (talk) at 06:00, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Length, date verified. Hook's offline ref accepted AGF. All paragraphs have refs; all refs appear to be RS. No apparent paraphrasing issues. User:Olessi does not appear to have 5 dyk credits, ergo QPQ not required. Interesting hook. Good to go. --Rosiestep (talk) 01:10, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Look, I hate to butt in, but this DYK has at least two completely unreferenced paragraphs. Correct me if I am wrong, but our modern DYK standards do require at least one-per-para refs for each para, right? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:50, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) You're right about the requirement, but I'm seeing at least one reference in each paragraph (barring the lead, where one is not required). Some are not at the end of these paragraphs, but that isn't part of the requirement—internal inline citations are allowed. All six history paragraphs have at least one ref, including the first one after "1263" (a hook fact), the third after "Johann Bretke", and the sixth after "1950". I'm restoring Rosiestep's AGF tick, but if there are other issues, feel free to reinstate your icon. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:04, 23 December 2012 (UTC)