User talk:Olessi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive
Archives
archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
Archive 5
Archive 6
Archive 7

Note: If a conversation is spread across the talk pages of multiple users, I take
the liberty to copy related snippets to this talk page. Some comments were not
directly written on this page, but are always shown in the correct context.
Formatting may be adjusted for consistency.

Königsberg[edit]

Thank you for your articles on the buildings in Kønigsberg. I found them all very interesting and informative. Pity nearly all of them have been completely demolished. --Ipigott (talk) 16:24, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see you around being productive! Thanks for everything you are doing. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); December 20, 2012; 17:25 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick response. Good to see you back after a long absence. Keep up the good work. --Ipigott (talk) 21:19, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back![edit]

It was a pleasant surprise to see your name pop up on my watchlist. Now if I only had time to get back to editing... Anyway, great to have you here again! —Kusma (t·c) 19:57, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aye! Seconded. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:28, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Would you guys mind taking a look at Talk:Preußischer Landtag to see if my understanding of its history is correct? Olessi (talk) 22:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Schlosskirche (Königsberg)[edit]

Gatoclass 00:03, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! It's now featured on Portal:Germany. If you have more DYK related to Germany, please feel free to add it there yourself, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:06, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, William I was crowned king in the Königsberg church in 1861; he was crowned emperor in Versailles in 1871. Olessi (talk) 22:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages[edit]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Moditten. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. This can help you too, as the WikiProject members will often defend your work from deletion and try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:02, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Steindamm Church[edit]

Gatoclass 00:04, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Tragheimer Palve, Olessi!

Wikipedia editor Ana Bykova just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment on Ana Bykova's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Friedenskirche (Königsberg), Olessi!

Wikipedia editor Wer900 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It appears okay, hopefully the church is covered at length in Albinus.

To reply, leave a comment on Wer900's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for December 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Beydritten (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Quednau
Mendeleyevo Microdistrict (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sudovia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Neuendorf Church[edit]

Hi, I'm Ana Bykova. Olessi, thanks for creating Neuendorf Church!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for making a wiki page, it looks great. Please refer to the tags added to find out how you could improve it. Best wishes,

Anastasia Bykova (talk) 00:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Disambiguation link notification for January 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nevskoye Microdistrict (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kalthof
Pregolskiy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Urban okrug
Rzhevskoye (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Thirteen Years' War

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karina Kay for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karina Kay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karina Kay (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:57, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Keri Windsor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails PORNBIO, only one award/nom not scene-related, negligible reliably sourced bio content

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hindenburg-Oberrealschule (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mittelschule and Steindamm
Bessel-Oberrealschule (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mittelschule
Bismarck-Oberlyzeum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mittelschule
Vorstadt Oberrealschule (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mittelschule

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mark Brandenburg (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 16:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II[edit]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to the second issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; we get close to a hundred discussion threads each year and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised. Last year we were featured in the Signpost, and our interviewer was amazed at our activity. In the end, however, even as active as we are, we are just a tiny group - you can easily become one of our core members!

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

  • we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 83,000 pages as Poland-related - that's an improvement of over 3,000 new pages since the last newsletter. Out of which 30 still need a quality assessment, and 2,000, importance assessment. We have done a lot to clear the backlog here (3 years ago those numbers were 1,500 and 20,000, respectively). Can you help assess a few pages?
    • assessing articles is as easy as filling in the class= and importance= parameters on the talk page in the {{WPPOLAND|class=|importance=}} template. See here for a how-to guide.
  • once an article has an assessment template, it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions.
  • you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is a good place to watchlist if you just want to stay up to date on possible deletions of Poland-related content)
  • we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ. In addition to this automated list, you are also encouraged to help review articles from our B-class reviews requested list found here.
  • also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on. We have tens of thousands articles in need of cleanup there, so if you ever need something to do, just look at this gigantic list. (I am currently reviewing the articles tagged with notability, either proving them notable or nominating for deletion; there are still several dozens left if you want to help!).
  • did you know that newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, occasionally nominated for deletion, and their creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project if they show promise as new authors of Poland-related content.
  • we are maintaining a Portal:Poland
  • automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s)
  • Breaking news: we are looking for a Wikipedian in Residence for the New York City area. See Wikipedia:GLAM/Józef Piłsudski Institute of America for details.

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!


With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

It took me three years to finish this issue. Feel free to help out getting the next one before 2017 by being more active in WikiProject management :)

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a member at WikiProject Poland.
Please remove yourself from the mailing list to prevent receiving future mailings.
Newsletter prepared by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here and sent by Technical 13 (talk) using the Mass message system.

Nomination of Kelly Wells for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelly Wells is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Wells until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Call for endorsement of projects[edit]

Hello, I have proposed new topic for Wikipedia and ask for your support https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Masterworks_of_Art_in_Wikipedia

Anyone willing to participate as volunteer translator is welcome also at our Czech Wikipedia project: cs:Wikipedie:WikiProjekt Knihovna umění.--NoJin (talk) 09:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Stadthaus (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 09:25, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Julia Bond for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julia Bond is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Bond until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 09:03, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frederick William University[edit]

The article Frederick William University has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cognizance (festival) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cognizance (festival) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cognizance (festival) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 15:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Distilleries of Albania has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Distilleries of Albania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article DIDWW Ireland Limited has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Company has no notability. Seemingly created to legitimise dubious cold call marketing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seddon talk 12:40, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Dzierzgon Mapa.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 03:25, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roman language for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roman language is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman language until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:02, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

== Just copy the source code and paste it on the talk page of the user you wish to invite.

This user has been invited WikiProject Prussia please consider checking us out.

==

Kaiser Kitkat (talk) 23:13, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karen Young (actress) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Young (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Young (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:University of Rostock faculty has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:University of Rostock faculty, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. buidhe 20:37, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Black Eagle has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:41, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Red Eagle has been nominated for listification[edit]

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Red Eagle has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:47, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Halo game" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Halo game. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 6#Halo game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Pless" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pless. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 23#Pless until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Name Correction from Reiner to Rainer[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reiner_Stahel https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainer_Stahel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8109:25C0:6C8:C8:F17F:6360:C6AB (talk) 11:04, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:University of Düsseldorf has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:University of Düsseldorf has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 12:41, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:University of Düsseldorf alumni has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:University of Düsseldorf alumni has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Katsu (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only sourced to a college newspaper, no assertion if notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hoponpop69 (talk) 14:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Königsberg for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Königsberg, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Königsberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:West Prussia has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:West Prussia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Soldier-King" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Soldier-King and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Soldier-King until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:36, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Prussia has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:People from Prussia has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A World on End requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 16:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Katsu- A World on End cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Katsu- A World on End cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 16:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Otto's Pub & Brewery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve DIDWW Ireland Limited[edit]

Hello, Olessi,

Thank you for creating DIDWW Ireland Limited.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

May have been prematurely moved from draftspace. Please add content demonstrating notability. Being licenced in multiple countries or being mentioned in a book by an non-notable author, six years ago, doesn't cut it. Concatenate and/or drop references - no need to have 7 references for the first sentence, or 13(!) for number of countres it operates in.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]