Template talk:Calvinist–Arminian debate

Christianity: Theology / Reformed Christianity / Arminianism

	Christianity portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
	This template is supported by theology work group.
	Reformed Christianity portal This template is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity.
	This template is supported by WikiProject Arminianism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Why is Pelagianism in this template?[edit]

Why is Pelagianism in this template? I know Calvinists often accuse Arminians of being Semi-Pelagian or Pelagian. (And, indeed, some Arminians may be.) But why is that in this template? I know Arminians often accuse Calvinists of being Antinomian. (And, indeed, some Calvinists may be.) Why not add Antinomianism to this template too? I say remove Pelagianism from this template (create a separate Pelagianism template) or be fair and add Antinomianism. TuckerResearch (talk) 20:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Tuckerresearch: I think that Pelagianism was added more because this old controversy was referred to later in the Calvinism/Arminian debate. But of course it is historically a separate debate, then yes, Pelagianism is not 100% relevant in this footer, and it can be removed. ---Telikalive (talk) 10:20, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removed, then. TuckerResearch (talk) 14:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this template really useful?[edit]

Now that there is an Arminianism footer, I suggest to create rather a Calvinism footer to avoid redundancy.---Telikalive (talk) 16:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]