User:Begoon/ACE2015

This is a sortable table - click arrows in header row...

Candidate	Comments	Opinion	Result
Callanecc	Officious, rules-bound. Not what I'm looking for at all.	Oppose	5
Casliber	Proven record. Sense of humour. Common sense. Experience. Obvious support.	Support	1
Drmies	Sometimes a little too "cliquey", but I nearly always agree with his decisions. He has wikipedia's interests at heart. Would do well in the role.	Support	4
Gamaliel	Too political/drama prone. I don't like GamePlayers and Gamaliel is one of those. Do not trust to be neutral.	Oppose	9
GorillaWarfare	Too political. Activist. Thinks you can recuse then unrecuse. Do not trust to be neutral.	Oppose	7
Hawkeye7	Desysopped for cause.	Oppose	12
Hullaballoo Wolfowitz	Solid, experienced editor. Cares about the encyclopedia. Level headed.	Support	18
Keilana	Just doesn't give the "responsible and ready for authority" vibe to me. Sorry.	Oppose	3
Kelapstick	Solid, experienced editor. Cares about the encyclopedia. Level headed.	Support	6
Kevin Gorman	Too political. Breeze-driven activist. Seeks out drama and often makes poor decisions. Craves power/recognition. Do not trust to be neutral. No.	Oppose	15
Kirill Lokshin	Disappeared, then returned to explain and "demonstrate" how he could do what other admins were "too scared" to do. Don't trust his motives. Do not trust to be neutral.	Oppose	8
Kudpung	Means well, I think, deep down, but utterly fails to convey that, often upsetting users new and old with a surly and rude manner. Also seems very inflexible. Acted ludicrously on his questions page. Not suited for position(s) of responsibility, imo. I seem to remember he was not always like this - maybe time has taken a toll?	Oppose	13
LFaraone	I have not been impressed with his tenure to date. May mature for another term later.	Oppose	11
Mahensingha	Too inexperienced.	Oppose	21
MarkBernstein	Too political. Activist. Seeks out drama. Here for Mark Bernstein. No.	Oppose	19
NE Ent	I'd like to have supported Ent. It's a close call for me, but in the end I'm not comfortable he has the right balance between IAR and applying the strict letter of the law. That's particularly important for this role, and flexibility is a crucial quality I'm looking for here.	Neutral	17
Opabinia regalis	Excellent candidate. Would be a boon to the committee. Fresh and innovative.	Support	2
Rich Farmbrough	Have to stay on the fence. I like Rich - lots of common sense, but can be a touch too intransigent. That's not a good thing for ArbCom.	Neutral	14
Thryduulf	Poor performance in current committee. Officious, inflexible and rules-bound	Oppose	10
Timtrent	I'd like to support this candidate, but just too milquetoast, plus some odd edits wrt NOTCENSORED give me pause	Neutral	16
Wildthing61476	Too inexperienced.	Oppose	20