User:Marjan Tomki SI/WP links

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I often move from device to device and can't always carry bookmarks or similar data. I'll put here links related to wikpedia editing, and other WM projects, partly till I get stuff memorized, partly as a quick referrence index.

Links[edit]

WP, Wikt, WD... tutorials, general help, policies, general formatting[edit]

WP, Wikt, WD: arbitration procedures[edit]

  1. Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary
  2. WP:OWN - "Ownership" (including meniton of Uncle Joe - supposed meaning J.V.D.Stalin as related to Uncle Sam - US)
  3. WP:RS - reiliable sources, WP:IS - independent sources
  4. WP:NPOV- neutral point of view, WP:POV; WP:AGF and WP:GF - assume good faith, WP:NPA - no personal attacks, WP:civil, WP:BRD - bold, revert, discuss, WP:DR - dispute resolution, WP:1RR - one revert per day, WP:EXTREMIST, WP:POINT, WP:OUTING - posting other's private data
  5. Wikipedia:Edit warring
  6. Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
  7. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration
  8. Wikipedia:Arbitration guide
  9. WP:DYK - "criteria etc. for adding Did you know content to articles", template:Did you know? , Template talk:Did you know?
  10. m:Jerk - might sometimes be useful to get reminded, that not everything is following policies if one forgets the goal; WP:IAR; Zotero reference management SW

Advanced formatting, templates and how that works[edit]

{{colbegin}} contents {{colend}}
{{lorem}} <br> {{lorem}}

Sister projects[edit]

Articles to see how something is done[edit]

Wales, Enciclopaedia Britannica, Einstein → to see how WD hopefully works correctly - see here

Cathegories, templates[edit]

Pictures and maps[edit]

WP related programming[edit]

On WP and projects history[edit]

Including contexts of time (what others did wrong and WP rules were developed to prevent etc.)

Neutral point of view[edit]

Conservapedia, Flat Earth case cases[edit]

Google conservapedia flat earth
Cpedia didn't go quite that far when I looked (202104), but Google finds informative other pages with that search string. Some of those carry mostly drawings;[1] this one what a (probably a bit prepotent) youth thinks on that (==wtf?),[2] what are some of the craziest entries in the Conservapedia @quora. [3] I think I need to show some of these to some people.
  • The Scientific Method Syllabus - Fall 2010 [4] good to see why verifiability principle is important (within any science and knowledge). North Carolina STB: a warning of corruptability of "official science",[5]

Catholic Church sensitive articles[edit]

Talk page seem civil. Main page semiprotected; casual (IP) users spot mistakes and propose corrections, which seem to get implemented.

References

Other sensitive[edit]

  • Fatwa - seems well done, to check WD also.

Unexpected[edit]

I see TOC here is collapsable (hide/show), but it is not so in some other projects. It seems dependant - and I intend to see, where the difference is.

It seems it started concurrently with inserting the following notice here. I expected that not to work, because template was inserted into nowiki area, but template call might be other than wiki markup.

Not necessariliy aan template is the reason (I put it in commments also, and it still worked (and in other subpages too). It might either be applicable to whole page (all subpages), comment wouldn't make in inactive (should try remove aan string) - but that's for later.

 {{aan}}  at the beginning might ask for collapsable  TOC (to be tested).

References[edit]