I don't suppose you would like to give it a try in expanding this article? I'll help you out if you need it--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 23:41, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
No...not really...sorry. I just don't know enough about tactical formations....if you would take a lead role in expanding it, I'll help with copy-editing, formatting references, stuff like that...if you would want that. Cheers! the_ed17 14:17, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
USS Nevada
I'd say yes, especially after looking at the other well-written articles on the topic (they don't have it and it doesn't seem to be a detriment to not have it). I'd also say that the article is lacking a bit with regards to being a GA. For what I mean, you might want to take a look at USS Texas (BB-35) and the articles on the Iowa class battleship including the individual ships of that class. Also, make use of DANFS as much as you can since it is public domain text, also citing it properly using {{Cite DANFS}}. I'd review the article for GA but I've contributed lightly to the article which rules me out. -MBK004 18:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Done (removed section)
Yes, but the Nevada is going to have less information then those two articles simply because she is not around today... the_ed17 20:22, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Done (DANFS) 20:22, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to the Military history project
Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The project has a stress hotline available for your use.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Woody (talk) 22:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome! I'm going to continue working on just USS Nevada (BB-36 for now, though...I'll see if I can get its GA nomination through. Cheers! the_ed17 22:10, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Escanaba and Lake Superior Railroad, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.elsrr.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:29, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
...Oh. Well then. I guess that I should change it around, eh? Whoops. the_ed17 22:35, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Done, after it was deleted once because I went to eat... the_ed17 23:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Reply to Sword of Shannara
Yes, I will help you as best I can. However, I will be frequently occupied with school. So be prepared to have unanswered messages for quite a while. Nonetheless, I will contribute as best as I can.
You're welcome; I hope I haven't offended you by editing your user page. It's good to see someone so dedicated to the Shannara articles, I'll try to help you out more often now, if I can. See you around. Cheers, Zacharycrimsonwolf 14:36, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Lol it's nice to know that you're adding new sections to the articles. All I ever did was to improve (or so I hope) the current content of the articles. Nothing more. By the way, if there're any articles you'd personally like help with, gimme a call. Cheers, Zacharycrimsonwolf 15:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Try The Sword of Shannara...it failed a FAC a few days ago, and I can't fix anymore of the suggestions they made...I can't get at any of the other reviews listed here...anyway you could help so that we can get that to FA? the_ed17 15:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
I would try, but The Sword of Shannara book isn't with me; it belongs to my friend. I'll try to get it soon, but it might take sometime. Meanwhile, I'll try to re-read the discussion when I have the time. It's rather confusing. Cheers, Zacharycrimsonwolf 16:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
You know what's sad? I have almost the same problem--I do own Sword, but my friend had it at his house back home!! =) Thanks for agreeing to help. Good day! the_ed17 17:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes, he was disruptive. However, he apologized, and hopefully he will be reformed into a decent editor here...and I'll help him if he wants to be a decent editor. Thank you for the SPADE link, but after his apology, I think that he will change...though if he dosen't, I'm on your side. Good day, the_ed17 21:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
You're more optimistic than I am, but I'll be happy to be proved wrong. Cheers.... :) justinfr (talk/contribs) 21:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Just a firm believer in WP:AGF for everyone but people like Willy on Wheels. Maybe I'm wrong, who know? But until someone destroys that trust/faith/whatever, I'll keep it. =D the_ed17 21:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Righto! By the way, I like your lolcats. justinfr (talk/contribs) 21:58, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you! A) I like them too. =) B) I got them from FisherQueen. Gotta give credit where credit is due. the_ed17 22:00, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
He was just blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry....so my GF was completely misplaced....*sigh* the_ed17 00:33, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Oh well, you can't win them all. Persevere! :) justinfr (talk/contribs) 02:54, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Just read through their talk page. Wow, what a mess. I'm not sure there was anything that anybody could've done on this one! justinfr (talk/contribs) 02:59, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
At least I can say that I tried...thanks for the kind words. =) the_ed17 03:04, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
I have granted you rollbacker status. Remember to use it wisely as it can just as easily be removed. :) -Djsasso (talk) 21:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you! I will. the_ed17 21:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)
The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
GA-Review problems
If you are satisfied with the fixes to Krusty Gets Kancelled, could you perhaps make a comment to that effect at the article's talk page at the bottom of that thread? I think if it is okay with you this would be a useful thread to then move to the GA Review subpage along with the initial GA Review. Cirt (talk) 03:25, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Yep! Hey, better hearing it from me now than in a GAR later! the_ed17 03:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Gulp, good point. Cirt (talk) 03:47, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
USS Oklahoma
I do have a cite for the type of engines being the last installation, but not for the vibration problems. It might take me a few days to dig it up, though. -MBK004 18:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Better than nothing; will you add it to the article when you are finished looking/when you want too/sometime? (I couldn't find that online anywhere...did I just skip over it or something???) the_ed17 18:25, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
It's not online as far as my knowledge. It's in a book that's about 25 years old which covers every single US battleship ever built. With it I could expand every article to FA if I had the time (which I don't). You might want to give me a reminder on Friday about finding this. -MBK004 18:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Oh my gosh, that would be an awesome book! (Don't let me near it--I wouldn't do anything else for weeks!) Alright, I will...Thanks for the assist. the_ed17 18:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
USS Nevada (BB-36)
As i said originally, i liked your proposed DYK hook for USS Nevada (BB-36) and I liked your development of the article. And DANFS is a fine source, there is no need to come up with hooks based on difference sources. The issue for DYK is about whether the article is new, and how that can be evaluated given that the DANFS text originally incorporated in the article was not identified by quotes. I was willing to argue for carving out a DYK policy exception to allow articles like this one to be accepted, but I am not willing to get into an argument about it with MBK. I think MBK did not really read what i wrote, and/or is unfamiliar with DYK policy, so I think MBK misinterpreted what i was suggesting. But especially with apparent opposition i don't think any exception policy will be carved out. So I think you simply don't get DYK for the article.
Also, I made a suggestion about DANFS sourcing in the GA review for the article. As MBK notes in response there, it is not currently wikipedia policy to disallow DANFS paste-ins without specific crediting of wording (as would be provided by using quotes). But there are differences of opinion about whether that should be policy, and for articles to reach FA status it is my opinion that no general disclaimer should be allowed. If you are actually interested in the topic you could browse the varied opinions expressed at Wikipedia talk:Plagiarism and discussions linked from there. Anyhow, happy editing! doncram (talk) 01:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. I liked them too. =D The hooks were from different sources because those facts were not in DANFS, by the way...
No big deal; it's only a DYK...I can understand them not wanting any exceptions...in for a penny, in for a pound.
I'm removing all of the directly-from-DANFS text now and rewriting...at this moment. =)
I've responded on the review to your question. -MBK004 02:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Responded on the review, too. =) the_ed17 02:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Re:Wikilinks in Sword
Ah, yes. I forgot about that, thanks for the reminder! I'll try to help out more often now, but all I can do is to shorten the plot, as well as taking out some of the more irrelevant (I hope) information to make it more concise and to the point. That's because most of what I can do is already done by you, and I doubt that I can do anything better! But I agree with the review that the plot generally needs some fixing; in terms of MoS, that is. But if you think I deleted some important info, please feel free to add it back. Cheers, Zacharycrimsonwolf 14:02, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
book title
Oops; sorry about that—I'm meant to be scrutinising such things, but sometimes it's hard to pick out in the mass of edit-mode text. Thanks for fixing it. Tony(talk) 14:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
No problem--it's not like dates are in book titles often anyway...an odd anomaly. the_ed17 15:33, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Nevada Class Battleship
How much of the article is from your source that you put there? (Source: U.S. Battleships An Illustrated Design History Norman Friedman ISBN0-87021-715-1) ...I'm going to try to get it to Good Article status, so any help would be appreciated. Cheers, -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 19:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Almost all of it Tirronan (talk) 19:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Is there any chance that I could get you to add <ref name=blah> to those sentences that are from that book, and to add {{fact}} tags to those that are not? Ummm, no offense intended, do you know how to do that? Thanks, -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 19:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm at work, I'll get the book out of storage and ref it this evening. Don't remove anything from that section most of it is documented fact and you will have the Naval types around here screaming. Tirronan (talk) 20:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Okay, thank you very much! (I don't have any printed sources on any battleships at all, only internet, so that will help gynormously!) -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 20:08, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Just so that you know, virtually every class through the Colorado Class could trace every design element directly back to the Nevada Class and all were designed as slow, armor heavy, gun heavy, with state of the art fire control, intended (stated or not) to sail across the pacific and back with battle damage. That is why they look so much alike. Tirronan (talk) 20:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I knew that. =) See USS Nevada (BB-36), something like that is in there somewhere, though it might be unreferenced....I'm not sure. -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 20:17, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
While Mr. Friedman's book is informative it is about as exciting as reading a toaster design manual. You would have to be a propeller head to read it twice hence it is in my storage. Tirronan (talk) 20:30, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
But that sounds exciting! Thank you for offering to add the references even though it is boring...your sacrifice is greatly appreciated. -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 20:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I've got the book as well, just haven't added it to my listing yet. -MBK004 20:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Should I take your review as a GA review or just comments? If it's just comments then it should be moved to the article's talk page, which I will still address. GaryKing (talk) 21:17, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Ummm ...take it how you want it...? I'm not going to do a full GA review because I'm afraid that I'll miss something... and that debacle I mentioned... so it's no big deal. Sorry for being very ambiguous... -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 21:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Okay; we can keep future correspondence on the /GA1 page itself as I will be watching the page, and I assume you will be, too. GaryKing (talk) 01:41, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
I see someone else has fixed some of the stuff at the review. Could you please take another look at it? GaryKing (talk) 14:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Alright I think I've got everything. GaryKing (talk) 15:15, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
I think that's everything :) GaryKing (talk) 15:31, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Nevada and Bots
Well, personally, I love GimmeBot, it does a marvellous jobs with little praise for its operator (hence why he might be retiring it), but like humans, it occasionally makes mistakes, the GA date has little relevance anyway, what is a few hours? Regards. Woody (talk) 23:48, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, it's not a big deal anyway...I just wanted to let him know that it was off, in case there was something that needed to be fixed... Cheers, -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 23:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Does this sound biased?
The IQAF has expressed an interest in buying 36 new-built F-16s to reduce its reliance on U.S. air power and potentially allow more American forces to withdraw from the country according the US military. Cheers--EZ1234 (talk) 04:04, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
No it doesn't; however, you do need a source for that if you don't have one. =) Very interesting bit of info... -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 04:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Yeah I have sourced the infomation and have formatted the reference. By the way thanks for your help on the Iraqi Air Force article Cheers--EZ1234 (talk) 04:18, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Need any more help there? (Just ask, and you shall recieve! =]) Remember that periods come before references, i.e. ..blah blahblah.<ref>{{cite web| ..... }}</ref> Blahblah... -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 04:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
What do you mean by periods come before references? Cheers--EZ1234 (talk) 04:50, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Oooo you place the reference after a full stop. Is that right? --EZ1234 (talk) 04:57, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
When you write this when typing it in:
It was [[Charles Joughin]], the chief baker on the ''[[Titanic]]'', who fortified himself with alcohol, threw deck chairs overboard for flotation devices, rode the stern down and claims to have stepped into the water without getting his hair wet.<ref>{{Cite book|title=A Night to Remember|year=1955|(whatever else goes in here)... }}</ref>
See how the period comes before the <ref>? Like blah.<ref>? You see? Sorry if this is confusing...-talk-the_ed17-contribs- 05:02, 6 September 2008 (UTC)]
Thats what I meant. Thanks for that!--EZ1234 (talk) 08:03, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you but can you help with the Post-invasion and unknown inventory sections? Cheers--EZ1234 (talk) 08:04, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Sure! Sorry for the long turnaround—I had to sleep. =) -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 14:26, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
What do you want me do with the sections? -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 15:48, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Several of the refernces are dead and I need you to find references that fit the info. Don't worry I will try and find some as well :). Cheers--EZ1234 (talk) 01:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
I will also formatt the references--EZ1234 (talk) 01:39, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
I am planning to add articles on NATO Undersea Research Centre (NURC), Task Force Alfa, and Patrol Squadron 8 (VP-8) linked to the Operation Strikeback article.Marcd30319 (talk) 17:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm looking, but it might be until Monday before I've found anything. -MBK004 00:40, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Alright...sorry for being pushy about it... I just wanted to make sure that you didn't forget... -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 00:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Barnstars 'R' U
Well, thank you! I put it on my userpage. =) -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 02:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
You're more than welcome. I'm not sure if there's a Starfleet protocol, but what I've seen is, it's not copied to a userpage, it's actually moved. I've no objection to copying, but I think "one per customer" may apply. Unless you get 2 (& I've had double visits...), which would be an easy cheat for such a master of deceit &.... =] Dr. Lightturn off the flashlight! 05:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC) (One hazard of hiding out: I keep forgetting the timestamp...)
They were changed (prior to my restoration) to redirects to a mainspace article, but you should still find the full content of each page in the history. Let me know if I can do anything further for you! Lankiveil(speak to me) 23:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC).
Cite web template
Hi! I just wanted to let you know that I have no problem with you adding comments like that to my reviews. The more help, the better :) Dana boomer (talk) 18:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Jesus H. Christ...did you guys' fingers hurt after that? That was a LOT of words...put that into a bloody book! Alright then, you win, due to that link! =) the_ed17 01:27, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. Thank you. I'd like to thank the Academy.... =] And did you notice, it's still not a settled issue? TREKphilerhit me ♠ 01:55, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Lol, nice. And what powers do you possess? =) Yes, I noticed that...it surprised me! the_ed17 03:26, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
The power to remain invisible on WP. =] Douglockcontact self 10:59, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Jumps* *Looks over shoulder* Aaah! I'll give myself power over him...I'll be the President! Dr. Josiah Edward "Jed" Bartlet *hidden in the shadows* (the_ed17) 18:47, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
(now the conversation that started on my talk page!)
Since your cowardly refusal to stand & fight here, I declare myself winner. =] (It was getting harder to stay in-MU, tho. And getting a bit OT.) Magneto♠ electrify me ♠ 19:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
A bit OT?? =) lol. I don't recognize that you win, by the way! No, I thought that you hadn't replied because I missed it on my watchlist...=) I don't know enought about the MU, so I couldn't stay inside of it. Anyway...where were we....oh. What happens when Mr. Flash meets the proverbial immovable object? Secondly, isn't Flash dead? How are you Flash if he's dead? Heck, hasn't Magneto been stripped of all his powers?!?!?! Also, are you the Moric? (How 'bout a reference from outside of the Marvel universe? Take that and chew on it.) :-) -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 19:47, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I don't count you bound by my rules, Chaotica. Nor do I claim to be Barry; in fact, I expressly say I'm not.
Not knowing if Flash has any limits on his powers (DC didn't seem to have that concept...), I postulate he just vibrates at a mystically correct frequency & goes right through it, or sends it to Earth-10 zillion, or something. ;D
"How 'bout a reference from outside of the Marvel Universe?" Never, you fiend! (Well, maybe after 2 or 3 more tries.) Roguemy powers really suck 19:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Look at your Chaotica link...it goes to Star Trek....it that supposed to be that way? (I hope not, not after you said, ""How 'bout a reference from outside of the Marvel Universe?" Never, you fiend! (Well, maybe after 2 or 3 more tries.)" ...=p
I meant my link is that one from outside of Marvel! -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 20:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I meant my cover IDs. I'm trying to stay in-Xmen (no, not a misprint; it's pronounced "zhmen"), because of the X-Mansion link that started it all.
OR? You don't read enough DC. Jay & Barry both vibrated between universes & through things all the time, & (AFAIK), DC never put a limit on their ability to pull new powers out of a hat.
I've never read DC! I've seen X-Men the movie, and that's it!
Oh. Darn... xD
I propose a match-up of the Moric and the Reaper from the Shannara series vs. someone...maybe Allanon thrown in there for kicks....let's see how THAT goes! -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 20:42, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Only seen the movie? Ah, you poor, benighted soul. Ye've missed the growth (not much, he's still only 5'6") of Logan from an antisocial mad killer to a mad killer with an apprentice. (This guy was suprisingly good, even if he was too tall.) Ye've missed the little people (no, not counting Logan). Ye've missed Jason taking a really bad trip. (He won't be coming back, unlike some people, who some people couldn't leave alone, after other people insisted on killing her. {OK, I'm still upset by her death, oh, 25 yr later. Sue me.})
Whoa...I HAVE missed a lot, haven't I! ...Somehow, I can't really imagine him with an apprentice...especially a girl...but that's just me. When did leprechauns appear?? Oh, you poor thing; why are you still upset if she was brought back?
Oh, but if Allanon is there to, he is the best wizard from good, thereby canceling Mr. Sanderson's/Doctor Strangelove's powers...=)...then the Moric eats Jean Gray, takes her over and nullifies everyone while the indestructible Reaper kills everyone. =D Brutal, I know...but they win! ;) -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 18:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
P.S. What the heck am I well on my way too?? Sorry for not getting the allusion...=(
Am I being too Yoda? It's the Tower of Babel on your userpage... And Doc? You gotta be a real Marvel Zombie to get that one: Sanderson was a repeat LOC offender who shared his name with Strange's 1st-app "cover ID" (later dropped).
I'll call on Rogue & Leech (or Artie) for Allanon, so no worries; he's nullified. And Jean eaten by Moric? I doubt it, not after the M'kraan Crystal trick, even without her own version of spidey sense.
"Girl"? I can't say I've ever thought of Kitty as a mere girl...especially not after "Days of Future Past". (140-1? or 139-40? It's been too long since I've read 'em. 137 is the death, 138 is "Elegy"...139 "Days"? And 141 Wendigo? Or is Wendigo first? I think so.)
Don't judge Logan by the film; he was much tougher in the book. (That "tug" to go see Patrick? He'd have told the Prof, "Stay outta my head" & slugged Scotty for getting in the way when he went to leave. And that would be on a good day. Jackman did the much later Wolvie, after "Elegy" & the Wendigo story, not the early one. I do disagree with Chris & John's making him psycho, tho; bad-tempered would have done it nicely.) Which made him & Kate (I have trouble thinking of her as Kitty) such a pair; she was more like his daughter. Rogue was filling much the same role in X1, & was that Kitty I saw thru the wall in X2?
Leprechauns? ("Maybe we don't believe it talkin' Wolverines, either.") Way back in 103-4 (ish 8-9 from XmNG in the regular continuity, ish 10 counting the Giant), when the team visited the Partridge place. (You wouldn't believe how long it took me to notice that...)
Upset she's brought back? No, more that she died. What burns me up is they couldn't leave an honorable death alone. The only reason Marvie stayed dead is 'cause the book wasn't selling.... When X-Men was at 600K/mo, could Marvel resist reintroducing the original gang? Not a chance. (Borrowing Rachel for it was a slim chance, seeing how well she fit in the X-verse. Her, Kitty, & 'yana were a perfect trio. And she had her mom written all over her, which is one reason I liked her so much.) I do wish Chris had thought a little harder about "DoFP", tho. He could've fixed Jean's death EZ. If Shooter'd allow it, which I don't know enough to say... (Neither am I completely sure I'd've wanted him to bring her back, then. It would've seemed...tacky, or tasteless, & wrong, somehow, but it was possible.) Hank McCoywaiter, there's blue fur in my soup 14:16 & 16.25, 6 September 2008
Wow. Someone reads comics too often. =)
I've got more than just Allanon up my sleve; I'll call on Bremen, Walker Boh, Mareth and Cogline....more if you want, there were a lot of them. =D (Well, as long as there is a time machine there...) With all of the heroes from the Shannara universe, they'd have a very good shot against all of the X-Men.
Duh. I knew that. -_-
Oh...?
Oh...? (never read a comic book in my life, by the way...!)
Yeah, money's everything nowadays...sickening... -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 01:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
"very good shot against all of the X-Men"? You're missing something: just how powerful Phoenix was. Jean "detuned" herself til Jason cut the psychic breakers; the M'Kraan Crystal was effectively weaving a universe back together. Or I can pull the Avengers & Champs (ex-Xmen Warren, Hank, & Frostie, plus Herc, Widow, & later GR & Bill Foster). If needed, tho, let's see how they deal with Lord Manga redecorating their planet out from under them. "Swatch!" ("You're shouting again.")
"reads comics too often"? Sanderson was around a bit, but nothing like T. M. Maple, who'd turn up in LCs almost every month in at least two books (probably more, I only read a couple regularly); I never got a letter published once. (I don't think I wrote more than one, either.) Also, I've got a long lead on you. I got "Elegy" & Fist 15 & the first PowerFist new on the racks. (I've got a complete set of Fist readers, & a complete run of new X-Men from Giant #1 past the end of the Brood Saga, around 260, when greed & grim started getting to me. I'd have a complete run of the Milestones, too, but they were so hard to find...)
Never read comics? You don't know what you missed. OK, it's not the same now (boy, I sound old, huh?), but JLI still makes me laugh (& I've reread 'em half a doz times) ("I should never come out in the daytime."); the New Xmen, Fist, & the Mutants were as real to me as Jubal Harshaw or Paul Atreides; Santana still grabs me (& Tim could give lessons on how to create a credible fictional world); Monday (intro as a backup in Snout, later a major player before War Shaman) intrigues me; Static was about 30 years overdue (& a superb foil for Spidey in his prime); & I will defend Alan & Dave's Watchmen as literature to anybody. (I got most of the 12 off the rack before I got the graphic novel as a gift.)
"Oh...?" I take it I'm not clear. How can I clarify, Matthew? The WatcherI saw that 03:09, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
If you had read the books, you would think that they would have a chance too...but yes, Lord Manga would be kinda hard to deal with. Jean vs. the Elftones would be an interesting duel...heck, try the Black Elfstones! Also, take a look at the Warlock Lord--imagine him taking on a few of those X-Men (he has psychic powers too) with his Skull Bearers...but, of course, this is all OR. =D
Yes, you have a long lead on me; ___(your number) vs. zero!! =)
No, I don't! Yes, you do sound old! =D I always liked the "Justice League" television series on TV when I was a little kid a while back...(only 8 years ago or so)... They do sound interesting, though!
No, it's just that you were talking about how "they were a perfect trio" etc...pretend as if it's a WP article and write from an out-of-universe perspective, because I have almost no idea what you are talking about!! lol...=/...sorry. "Skull Bearers...are more than a euphemism for death."Herbert, Frank (1977). "Some Author, Some Tolkien". The New York Times Book Review (April 10, 1977): 15. 03:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
OR? Yep, especially since I'm as totally ignorant of their limits as you of Jean's. :D
"Oh...?" I suspected as much. I can't help think of the 3 of them as I knew them (which is pretty well). Kate & 'yana were best pals almost from the very start (after 'yana's time in Limbo; have a glance at her page). Rachel was of an age, too, & after coming from a dismal future ("DoFP"), got an opportunity to be "just a girl" for a change. (As much as any X-man did, to be sure.) They were cut from the same cloth, those 3, & written by Chris (who I was a fan of until the grims started taking over; I think he was getting tired). That trio was so perfect, I can't picture Chris breaking it up for X-Factor (tho strictly I don't think he had final say, since I don't think he owned them, Marvel did).
Haven't seen JLTV; I can't get interested in the 'toons (tho I understand Bats is excellent & if you like JLTV, I recommend it, on the word of somebody's opinion I trust). If you're going to start with any comics, JLI, the Milestones, & Watchmen are a must. They will, however, spoil you for most of the other crap. The early New Xmen are really good; the Phoenix Saga is the 2d best-written serial story I've ever seen, on a par with Watchmen, which gets the nod IMO because Alan & Dave created it whole cloth, while Chris had some backstory & the MU to rely on. (Start at 99, stop after 137; you can skip the Annuals.) Scout is a bit of an acquired taste; I'd skip the first 6 & start at 8 or 9, then go back after you've read 2-3 ish if you want the origin story. (I dislike origin stories, besides.) Don't try War Shaman or Swords of Texas first; WS is too dependent, & SoT is a bit...idiosyncratic if you haven't the backstory. If you lean more to fantasy (& Elfstones suggests it), look for the Pinis' EQ; fantasy doesn't get any better. Or have a look at Groo, which is as lunatic & funny as it gets. (Let me know if you figure out what Mark Evanier does. :D)
Do yourself a favor if you're buying & stay away from the specialty comics shops; the prices'll break the bank, even now, & you only need readers. Try the bins at used book stores. Magnusyes, Nanny, what is it now? 15:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Yeah.....=D
Oh, I see better now...and I can see how long-readers would not like that being ended...
Well, I'm not too interested anymore! (Got to be a teenager =]) If I can get to a bookstore when I've got some extra money, I will--I'm in college, so I'm gonna guess that you know how that goes....
No specialty comic book shops that I know of around here anyway--not a big enough buying population up here in da U.P. =D
Warlock LordI'm dead, but I stay alive because I BELIEVE that I'm NOT dead! 16:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
<--Trust me, you can start with Watchmen or Scout at any age, & I wouldn't hesitate to recommend EQ to an adult, either. The Xmen, maybe not, but Chris was aiming pretty hi, & hitting, til after the Brood.
I'd be a bit surprised if no splty shops close (pop here's only 200K); as noted, you're better off with straight bookstores, if you're going to take the time. Yeah, I know about college; I quit reading less for $ than lack of time... (I know you understand that...)
On Bats, maybe you do have to be younger, or have to have a particular attitude; the recommend is from a guy in his 20s, & I trust his judgment. (If he said "Read this", I'd look at it. We do disagree on manga, but his steers have been good in more mainstream stuff.) And to add one more I forgot, if you're interested in detective, look for Mike Grell's Sable; just watch out for the leprechauns. And try not to let the moose see you. =] (That's an extremely inside joke. Sorry.)
And just to be real clear (if I wasn't) on Jean, I had close to 4yr (from Giant 1 to "Elegy") to get familiar with her & the gang. (I never read but 1 of the original X-men, coincidentally the very one featuring the same baddie who got me reading the new ones in ish 98!) Her death was a shock, esp since nobody ever really dies in comics (unless, as noted, the book isn't selling). What's the only thing that can kill Supes? Yep, it ain't kryptonite. RorschachIf you don't stop it, I'm going for the elevator 17:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Well then I have to try it!
Oh, well I'll try it when I've got the money, and the time. =)
Detective stories sound fun; I've always liked Sherlock Holmes, so it can't be a huge jump to detective comics. =D
That would be pretty traumatic then, 4 years is a long time. Good point about Superman... that's actually kinda sad. Sorta like Captain America. -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 18:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Hope you enjoy, regardless. Sable as "detective" is maybe not the best term (but the 1st one to come to mind); have a look at the linked page & judge, 1st. It's the least superheroic book I ever read, a kind of Batmanesque thing.
Do yourself one favor. If you do start on the comics, just read to enjoy. You might be able to get collectibles, but it'd be decades before they're worth anything, if ever, so don't bother with the specialty stores unless you really want a particular ish. (I filled out my run of Fist that way, just to have 'em all, but I wouldn't again.)
I've wavered between the idea of leaving characters (esp baddies) dead & liking a really inventive "miraculous survival" story. My fave is Doc Oc surviving a nuclear accident because he wraps his arms around himself as he hides, 'cause they were originally designed to handle nuclear materials & so were innately protective. (Most aren't near so good...& if I see another teleport ring, I'll scream.) I don't know if John got to leave Supes dead or not, I never read the book, but I'd be very surprised if a change in writer doesn't have the ol' Big Blue Cheese back in the tights in nothing flat. (That's all it takes to get an old baddie back...)
On Holmes, have you seen PBS' broadcasts? I think Jeremy Brett is perfect for it. And I particularly liked Meyer's 7% Solution. (The movie is a bit too "Adventures of Sigmund Freud, featuring Sherlock Holmes" for me. Of course, when you cast Alan Arkin as Freud, & Nicol Williamson as Holmes, this should be no surprise...) I also liked the "remixes" Max Headroom did (30 minutes until the 20th Century?), taking the original stories & weaving them together: Irene Adler as an agent after the Bruce-Partington plans, for instance, was a very nice touch. And I think the treatment of Watson in "Sherlock Holmes in New York" was the best; if they weren't more nearly equal, why did Holmes put up with him? I haven't read all the originals, so maybe I missed something.The premise of "Young Sherlock Holmes" appeals to me, even tho it violates the canon, 'cause it'd explain the (seeming) paradox. Of course, Holmes admittedly admired Watson's courage (as I recall)...& it's just possible Doyle meant for Watson to be keeping a medical eye on Holmes' addiction, tho given the attitude to cocaine at the time (even in medicine), that'd be a long shot. Most probably, Doyle just never considered it, not being as used to dealing with continuity issues as we are. (TV will do that for you.) The WatchmooseI saw that 19:51, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
I will try!
Alright, I'll do that; shouldn't be too hard, as that's what I do with normal novels!
Mmmm that is a hard choice...I'd go with the "miraculous survival" because that would make for some awesome storylines...
No, I haven't seen anything on TV with Sherlock...I've read every short story (I believe) by Mr. Doyle, though. Read them a couple times each! =D Yes, TV is such an evil thing, isn't it? lol!
Out of names? Not even close. But I've been out-MU since Rorschach (Watchmen), & I lifted the Watchmoose from JSF.
If you're getting Detroit Ch56 PBS in UP (as I presume), you should be able to get BBC's Holmes with Brett Saturday nites (except in Pledge Weeks, like now). (How do I know? It's on cable here.)
I lean to survivals, too, but good ones are exceeding rare; of the ones I've seen (& I've seen my share!), only Doc Oc's was really good. Byrne pulled an interesting one with Jamie, but he was using it to bring in a baddie, so it was a bit wasted. And I tried coming up with a good one myself for Fist once; I'm not so sure a psychic imprint on the tiger amulet passes as "good"...but I do like it better than buying a substitute (which is what Byrne did).
If you ever run across comics trivia you want answered, give me a shout. I'll see what I can do. Meanwhile, I'll stop trying to sell you. =]
Here (Marquette) I probably do, but I don't in my hometown...only Wisconsin PBS and the NMU PBS there, but I'll check it out. Thanks!
Well, I guess that there are only so many original survivals....eventually, they are going to be copies...
Will do, and I don't care...never heard about comics before, so it's quite interesting. Cheers! -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 02:48, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
<--For a fellow Sherlockian, glad to be of service there.
"survivals" I think what bugs me the most is how little effort seems to go into most of them. Can it be so hard to study the character a little? Exploit his/her existing powers! Klaw (for instance, offhand) could encase himself in solid sound & resist part of a building falling on him. A "death" doesn't have to be permanent, either. I think of Beetle or Hobgoblin: beaten badly, buried under a fallen building, just barely managing to crawl out after stripping off wrecked equipment, & coming back, not with the same old gear (which is usual), but rejuvinated & improved (which more/less applies to both of them). From what I can tell, most of the deaths are a book's writers not liking a character, or being bored with them. (That's why Gwen Stacy got thrown off a bridge & Spidey couldn't save her. {You do know who he is, don't you? =]} It's still a puzzle to me how "super zhlub" manages to get such hotties, tho.)
Getting out of a tough corner is a measure of how good a writer is, & given the size of the MU, the number of baddies, & the number of escapes from seemingly airtight prisons, it can't be too hard to find hidden caches, secret hideouts, or mysterious benefactors, or have fans believe them. A last-second rescue from a burning Harrier would've done Nefaria just as well as a teleport ring, & been more credible, & it could've opened more story possibilities, not least clones of Thunderbird or a baddie spin on Logan (or Human Fly).
In the same vein, I'd love to see Iron Man meet up with a bunch of his top old baddies (not all at once, mind you...) & just hand 'em their heads, not even raising a sweat, & say, "I beat you before. Several times. Did you think I forgot how? Stay in prison."--& force the writer to come up with new ways to use the existing gear, or leave them gone. That makes it hard on the book's writer, but I think it also makes things more interesting. In balance, I'd do something raised in an IM LC years ago, & give IM experimental gear that doesn't work. Make him fight with his brain instead of his muscles (or armor, in this case). Give me writing duties on IM for a year, you wouldn't recognize the book when I was done. Of course, some of why it stays the way it is is driven by sales...& I can just picture them tanking if things got done my way. ;D Still, given you can't take Tony out of the yellow & gold (or for long, anyhow), & given you've got to have fights (is that in the Code?), it's still possible to avoid the "same old same old". (Also, I take the "invincible" seriously.) It does raise questions over use of other people's, & other titles', characters; outside Amazing, I haven't seen much crossover, & that's Marvel's flagship book. IM could handle it; IMO, he could be the most international hero Marvel has, & could very easily tap Marvel GB/Marvel Europe characters, & make use of the overseas fan base for locales & ideas. He doesn't have to be the "ugly American" (tho he often, even usually, has been).
"so it's quite interesting." Glad to hear it. I've got a really bad habit of not knowing when to quit. ;D Can I confess it's killing me all my inside gags are going right over your head? =] Ah, well. Maybe somebody'll notice here & come looking. I do take a certain pride in them either way. I can't resist a challenge. B. B. Flemmpass the poteen (this one's from JSF, too) 04:54, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
For a long time comic book reader, I guess that would be annoying—but for me, all of those escapes seem cool, jus tbecause I haven't seen any of them before! =D Rejuvenated and improved would be fun; sorta like rail fans when Union Pacific 844 goes into the shop to be repaired...and then she comes out, just like new. Same thing but backwards with the SS United States; there are many people who wish and pray that she will be "reejuvenated and improved" (I'm one of them!) but it just (in all likelihood) is not going to happen. =(
Wouldn't that be sweet if he took all of them on and owned them though??? =D Hmmm interesting....make them use their brains, not brawn...but isn't it the action that sells? If that's true, then you are right—there sales wwould tank with you ate the helm! :p
Well, it's more interesting to me just because no one in my family is interested in comic books, not even my 2nd cousins. My dad has always been interested in trains (when we went on an odyssey to Chicago, we had to take half of two days to go "trainwatching." =] I didn't mind though, it was kinda fun!)...though my love of novels I got on my own...I have like 40-50 novels at home including all of the Ryanverse novels (except for The Hunt for Red October) in hardcover, and the first 14-15 ish novels of Shannara. Also, (if you are looking for a good book) I found Off Armageddon Reef to be a surprisingly excellent...or if you like a scary thriller, the best I have ever read by far is Relic...the movie (from what I hear) sucked, but the book keeps you on your toes...don't read it a 2-3 in the morning and then go into your pretty dark basement to take a shower...(like I did)...freaked me out, even though I am/was 17 and knew that nothing wasw going to happen...=D lol! MBWUNThe monster that goes 'squish' in the night. 13:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
If you're a trainfan, have a look at this. (There's also planes & trucks, if you're inclined. I signed up at PSW, myself, but don't get there nearly often enuf.) It's a wiki, like WP, & if you've got a spare minute, they'd probably appreciate you copying & pasting articles from WP (tag it {{from Wikipedia}} & paste above that). Or do a bit of editing. Like WP, every little bit helps.
I'm less a completist on Ryan, & I'm not a big fan of hardcovers (PBs are easier to handle & read), but I think I've read 'em all (except the very newest, haven't got to it yet). Can't say I liked Shannara; tried Sword & just couldn't get into it. Nor Fritz Leiber's Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser, tho I finished the collection (1v). I'm more a Deryni or Xanth type. Somebody said once there's 2 kinds: those who read Red Planet & those who read The Hobbit. I had gone thru Red Planet & The Duelling Machine before I ever heard of Tolkien. ;D And if you took out the magic, Kurtz's would perfectly good historicals, they just drip with period-type detail. Don't think I've even heard of Relic (sorry, but your link goes a bit wrong =]), but it sounds interesting, & I'll have a look for it. Like creepy? Just 1 word: Lovecraft. He tops the "creepy" list in most of the informal polls I've seen. (I confess, I haven't tried him, but I liked "Witch Hunt', the Dennis Hopper film version) Heard of Reef, but haven't seen it, so I'll have a glance. I tend more to stuff like Bova's Privateers & the Duelling Machine, or Icerigger, Nor Crystal Tears, or 1 of the most intriguing settings I've ever seen, Sentenced to Prism (all by ADF), or just about anything Heinlein (Glory Road, no), & for me, David Gerrold has taken RAH's place in the pantheon.
I think generally you're right, it's the fights that sell for most fans, but in Xmen, I always liked the "days off" stories best, where they get to be just people. I don't think you could drop the fights entire (not when the fan base for comics generally avg 10yr olds, over 90% boys), & I don't suggest there wouldn't be an IM (just not Tony); from the previous attempts at it (& there have been at least 3-4 I can think of), it hasn't gone over well. I'd try it, if only to try & get inside what makes him want to be IM to begin with. What has he given up for it? Is it worth giving up having a life, to be a hero? Do you have to? (Spidey doesn't. Clark seems to think so (but Lois may have something to say about that... =]). I'd probably end up putting him back in the suit, but for, oh, 12-18 ish, I'd want to look at the man in the armor, for a change. (the other) Robbie Robertsonstop the presses! (or at least slow them down) 18:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
I took a look, but I think that I'll stay here...I like them, but not enough to do more than fix simple grammar errors etc...yes, I'm lazy. =)
I like PBs better too (except for the crease that they tend to get in the spine) but I got all of the hardcovers for free on Christmas from a family friend....yeah, I was happy. =D Don't give up on Shannara—yes, Sword was a 'long, hard slog', but try The Elfstones of Shannara...that is, by far, my favorite book anywhere...starts off with a quick battle scene somewhere, and then Brooks builds tension albeit kinda slowly) culminating with about 4-5 giant battle scenes...it's just awesome...you've got to try it. =D Relic wasn't a huge novel...but I found it on a Pamida shelf and bought it...it was very good. And who cares about the link--you found it, didn't you?? =)
Well sure, but you are older and can appreciate the 'days off'...those 10yr olds can't!! Yeah, even if it wasn't the best-selling comic, at least you could base the better-selling action book off of that one, while appeasing die-hard fans at the same time... But then again, if it's all about money.... ♠Ander Elessedil♠The younger Prince of the Elves
As noted, TSW will freely accept copied stuff off WP, if you're feeling ambitous (or bored ;D).
Gifted books of any description get no complaints from me. Not even ones by writers I don't especially like. ;)
I will try Shannara again. Tastes change. My first pass at Parker's Godwulf Manuscript (after seeing no hat, no trenchcoat), I didn't like it; after A Catskill Eagle made me laugh more than any detective novel ever, I went back & started over, & I'm glad I did. Ditto Pronzini's Nameless. (If you're thinking this is an advert for them, you're right. ;D)
I liked the days off stories at the time, tho I'll agree I was a bit older than the average then. Nor do I count myself typical. When I was ten, I was reading the tripod novels & Run Silent, Run Deep, & I'd read Dune, Stranger in a Strange Land, & Silent Victory before the end of Gr8. I remember being more interested in the gadgets & the way powers worked than in the fights, too, 'cause I was already thinking I'd love to write for Marvel. (Never managed it, tho...) Don't get me wrong, I don't dislike a well-staged fight scene. I didn't watch "Revenge of the Ninja", "Marked for Death", & "Lone Wolf McQuade" for the stories. Or the acting. ;) (I did start watching "Buffy" because of the cast, tho. ;D "X-Files", too. =])
Thinking of Tripods, let me ask. Do you remember novels by Larry Sloboda (or Svoboda) with an alien, where color was always involved somehow? I liked them a lot when I was much younger, but I'm damned if I can recall a title now. How about a detective-type novel dealing with WW1 fighters called Indigo Blue? An SF book, Ark of Venus? Anything with a car builder & piano player Arnek "Arnie" Tasjian, who had a cousin (or an uncle) who was a pro racer? An Armenian guy (I think), a truck driver who didn't want to be named "tank driver" before he took up sports car racing (in, if you can believe it, a +4+)? You're nearer the age to have read these recently, tho they're all pretty old. They're all juvenile/teen novels, & any leads on who wrote 'em would be very welcome. J. J. Jamesoncurse that wallcrawling pest! 22:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Bored. =)
Lol, same here!
Just make sure that you start with Elfstones...it is soooo much better...!
I was not typical...I read odd books, like U.S. Navy books when I was ten/eleven-ish, including the 1,026 page The United States Navy in the Pacific during World War II...that's how I learned to skip-read though! I'm going to read Dune when my friends are done with it.....watched them just for the girls? Nice! The first (serious) TV show I watched ever was either Star Trek: Voyager or The West Wing (don't remember which).......I'm a sad individual, I know. Quite the loner, actually...we lived out in the boonies for the first 13 years of my life; this coupled with me not having any friends didn't help the socializing...the only thing that saved me was moving right into the middle of this place...even if it was small, being in the middle forced me to get friends...it helped. That's also why I started reading other stuff, like Shannara and Sherlock Holmes! =D
Indigo Blue rings a bell, but I don't remember...did you try Google books for them? I haven't read any of the others though...sorry. =/ -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 23:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
I started watching 'em because of Charisma & Gillian. I thought BTVS was a stupid idea, 'cause the movie was such a piece of shit, & I was sure "X-Files" would be, too (geez, searching for ETs?). It was half a season of 1st-season repeats & eye candy before I realized BTVS was really well written (& about 3 full seasons before I figured out how good Sarah was, & how the show wouldn't work if she wasn't ;D I still think Cordelia's too shallow to have layers, tho. =]). It only took me a couple of shows to see Gillian was more than just a (very) pretty face, & the writing was really good there, too. And their relationship was a treat. ("Must be fate, Mulder.") Then they had to blow it...
Dune. You will not regret it. It's epic, it's so thoroughly prepared it reads like an encyclopedia (which is what Herbert wanted). It's a virtual textbook on creating a fictional society & ecosystem. It probably introduced more people to the idea of "ecosystem" & "environmentalism" than Silent Spring (how many people actually read that?). Then do yourself a favor. Pretend it's not part of a trilogy & ignore the half-dozen bad sequels, prequels, spinoffs, & assorted garbage. Do not, on pain of madness, see this.
USNWW2. Is that the 1v condensed Morison? I think I've read it, too. SV is a must for anybody interested in the Pacific War; it'll make you think twice about how important any of the famous battles were.
If you started serious TV w "ST:V", you didn't do too badly. (I prefer DS9, 'cause it's more character driven, but "ST:V" is closest to Gene's original vision for TOS. And despite the really good cast on DS9, STTOS was a better show. It was tighter & didn't drag, where STNG, STV, & DS9 sometimes seemed to.) And "West Wing"? It is one of the best shows ever to get on TV. End of argument, don't even try to convince me otherwise. That, "HSB", "Badge 714", & "The Jack Bauer Diaries" (&, for me, first season "Murder One") top the list. Watch those, they'll spoil you for much else, 'cause you've seen the best it can get. IMO, they all broke new ground, one way or another.
=D lol. I had always heard that X-Files was good, but I never got around to watching it...
I didn't think I would, after how Clay and Anders (the two of my friends who are reading it) talk about it all the time! And I'll try to resist....=D
Omph...umm...I don't really remember; that was a long time ago...I was a biiiig book though. Took me like 2 weeks to read, and then I read it again about a month later. =) History nut, I am.
I was hooked on it for a lonnng while, and then it ended...I was very sad. =( Looking back, I can see how it did drag (how many episodes can be adventures/aliens they get into/encounter on their way back from Delta Quadrant?) And yes, West Wing is one of the best shows to have ever gone on TV; I wholeheartedly agree. A bloody shame that it was canceled... -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 01:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
"X-Files" surprised me (until the last couple of seasons, with the move back to L.A. &, IIRC, contract disputes with David). BTVS was a stunner, it was so good, compared to the movie, & it's on my Top 20 of Best TV Ever, for treating horror seriously (but with humor) & women as capable (something SF's been doing in print since the '50s, but Hollywood's just catching on to...)
When I say "drag", I mean individual episodes, not the series proper. I thought "ST:V" casting was a bit weak, but I did like Kate (ever since the man in white, & she did "Ryan's Hope" which my mom was a fan of, I remember), & casting Tim Russ was a nice touch. (Makes me wonder if Gene might not've been smarter to cast somebody like Diahann Carroll as Pike's Number One, give her the ears, & shut up all the critics at once.) "ST:V" did the "boldly go" better than anybody, but I got pretty tired of Seska & Kazon. The Hirogen intrigued me, & much as I hated him for most of the run, The Doctor was conceptually really interesting. (I'd rather they'd gone nearer De Kelley in casting & Vic Fontaine in execution.)
History nut? Me, too, ever since I first read RSRD & Submarine!. I'm working my way thru Morison's 15v USN history of WW2.
I'd say something about resistance, but I started watching STV before she came aboard. (She'd have been enough, if I hadn't. ;D)
I think "West Wing" proves smart TV about politics can succeed, when it's done well. I'd watch reruns in preference to just about all the new stuff on now. Except "24". (Seeing Kiefer smile on that show is deeply weird. I never liked him in anything before, but I can't picture anybody better for Jack.)
What really drives me crazy is, all the people in charge on "24" (writing staff, producers, cast) are all Canadian, yet we can't get a show of this caliber on Canadian TV without an act of Congress or something. Oh, I don't mean the same show (nobody'd believe Kiefer as RCMP/sissy, & nukes in Vancouver is about as likely as gunfights on main street in Moose Jaw in December), but an equal quality show. What do we get? "Intelligence" (which is on CBC, which should be a hint...) U.S. TV gets "NYPD Blue". We get a show that can't make up its mind if it wants to be "Streets of San Francisco" or "Lou Grant", so it decides to be both, with a tidy "the moral of this story was" in the epilogue, for the peopletoo stupid to have figured it out for themselves. The talent's here. Graham Yost wrote "Speed", & I can't think of a good reason it couldn't have been shot in Toronto. (The heat? ;D The producers & lawyers would certainly have been at home. =]) We've given tax breaks to have U.S. stars in Canadian-made productions before (Agency comes immediately to mind), so why not again? "X-Files" was shot in B.C.; why couldn't it have been entirely homegrown? We could export it to Oz, Britain, NZ, & places in Arkansas where they've got people who've actually been aboard UFOs. ;D (Dubbing into American is no problem, we've got to loop it in for Quebec & Newfoundland anyhow. ;) )
Have you noticed 'Heroes"? Give it a look when the new season finally debuts (which is looking like 2010, with the strike... ;D). It's a bit faux Xmen for me, but Jack Coleman (Noah Bennett, a.k.a. HRG) is really good. And, of course, there's Hayden. (Seeing a pattern...? =]) Jamie Madroxwhat do you mean, fill it out in triplicate? 03:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Well, I meant the entire thing. =D Not that the episodes didn't drag, because they did at times, but the series stalled after they got into Delta Quadrant...(how many alien species can you meet?) I started watching it before Jeri too, but I always liked her...and yes, the Borg were just plain freakin' cool (from a 17-year-old's standpoint--when they first appeared when I was small, I was scared.) =D
Exactly. I think that West Wing was and is so much better than those action-oriented shows...but we are apparently in the minority. -_-
That's U.S. politics for you... =/ Maybe Canada just sucks! =p NYPD Blue was actually pretty good; I never got hooked, but my mom always watched it...the ending episode was the perfect ending ever...did you see that?
I noticed Heroes, all right. Never watched it faithfully, but I always stopped channel surfing for a few seconds when a scene with Hayden came on....same mindset? =) Bed time now...class in 7 hrs. 50 mins. -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 04:09, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
I won't (ever!) say stopping to watch Hayden is a bad thing (even if all she's doing is just standing there showing off her high heels... *sigh*) ;D
I was a faithful fan of Blue from the pilot. Dennis was exceptional (tho my first reaction was, "Oh, Christ, not another Buntz."; viz "HSB"). I rapidly got over it (tho David leaving gave me a few bad days; I liked Kelly a lot.) Amy's butt didn't hurt, either. =] And Gail? OMG. If your heart doesn't speed up for her, see a doctor immediately. (Did you know she was the girl in the Michael J. Fox Pepsi ad? Do you even remember that? =]) The whole run of Blue was Andy being a better man today than he was yesterday. The ending was perfect. ("I'm not gonna want nuthin' else." Oh, yeah. He's got what he wants.) Another example of good writing & fine casting. I wish it wasn't so rare. Them going off was a sad day in this house.
"Maybe Canada just sucks" Yeah, I had come to that conclusion. I was hoping it was more complicated. ;D
I took a quick glance at Nevada, but I'll go over it more carefully.
One other thing, FWIW. I'm taking quite a while to answer these, 'cause I'm juggling a bunch of stuff while I do, so if you've ever got to go, don't wait around. It could be all night... Harlan RykerI sank your battleship 05:28, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
I've got class in 15 minutes; I'll give a full reply to this in an hour and a half or so. -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 13:45, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
OK, done now. Anyway, lol exactly my thoughts. :-)
My problem is that I only caught the last season or so...I thought that any show that my mom watched would be retarded...I now see the error of my ways, though.
Oh, its not more complicated.
Nbd, I don't wait for a reply...I went and took my shower after the first reply. =D -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 15:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
At least you've got perspective, so no worries.
"not more complicated" Thanks for clearin' that up. ;D (Go to Toronto. ;D Do not pass "Go".)
Lol, how would I know--I don't even know who you are!! Also, what's the contradiction? It went right over my head...-talk-the_ed17-contribs- 23:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
How would I know that you are easily distracted--I don't even know who you are!! (the contradiction statement was in the wrong section) -talk-the_ed17-contribs- 23:25, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
