You are currently viewing an archive of The garmine's user talk page from June 2017. Please do not modify this page.

These discussions are no longer active and were moved here for historical and record-keeping purposes. If you need to respond to a discussion from here, please create a new discussion on my user talk page and with a link to the archived discussion here so I can easily follow, and we'll be able to pick up where we left off no problem.

Were you trying to send me a message? No worries. Just click here to go the correct page.

June 2017

PROD reverted

I reverted your BLPPROD on Mary Seymour Howell because this is not a living person. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:24, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

WikiDan61:Thanks. The garmine ^(talk) 13:13, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your article Γεωμηχανική

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Γεωμηχανική to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 13:27, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

KAP03: ????? are you saying I created the page? Or did you revert my translation? What do you mean? The garmine ^(talk) 13:29, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

KAP03:I see. I already translated the page.see here. The garmine ^(talk) 13:31, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Learniteasy

Would you care if I deleted your BLPPROD and instead nominated it for WP:A7 speedy deletion? Tutelary (talk) 14:49, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Tutelary:It appears someone else already has. But next time, don't hesitate to ask!You have My everlasting permission yes . The garmine ^(talk) 14:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

NPP 2

2nd request: Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm but complex maintenance tasks are not for beginners. I have reverted the PROD you placed on Satyajitsinh Vikramsinh Patankar and replaced it with the correct template. Please consider doing some more simpler tasks such as patrolling for vandalism until you have more experience. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Happy editing! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Sjsiwkwoswkwosmosmk Is vandalising so much, I have to have a specific tab open to watch his contributions! can't someone block him? The garmine ^(talk) 13:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Yep. RickinBaltimore just did exactly that. For future reference, reporting at WP:AIV is generally the quickest way to resolve this sort of issue. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:23, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

amd I did that too. Thanks! The garmine ^(talk) 13:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Singapore men national field hockey team

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singapore_men%27s_national_field_hockey_team&diff=next&oldid=784101385 Are you blind? It already had a reference, I added the reference section so it would display and you deleted it. Dumb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikash arjun (talk • contribs) 13:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Vikash arjun:I know. it was my fault. I have undone my edit and added a BLP scources tag instead. The garmine ^(talk) 13:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

User:The garmine I'm sorry I was snippy. Btw you should be outside playing, or even playing video games would be better than Wikipedia. This is a place for sad adults not for children with their futures ahead of them. It is very addictive and will interfere with your education or take over your life. You should quit now while you still can. Vikash arjun (talk) 13:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

@Vikash arjun: please remain polite when conversing with other editors you might want to read this WP:CIVILITY your comments are unacceptable. @The garmine: BLP means Biography of a Living Person so it cannot be applied to a hockey team but only to a person that is still alive at the time of writing. Domdeparis (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Vikash arjun:How the heck did U know that? And anyway, I hope you enjoy it here! The garmine ^(talk) 13:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Domdeparis: Yeah, I thought that someone had nominated it BLP PROD, because it was nominated via PROD and the reason was no references. The garmine ^(talk) 13:45, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

???

I did not understand anything The Garmine which country are you from? I did not know about what were you talking to? Could you tell me? Pranay Star (talk) 13:07, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Parany Star:What are you referring to, please? I'm from America. And what do you mean by "What were you talking to" The garmine ^(talk) 13:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Garmine, I believe Pranay is responding to a template left on their talk page. I have attempted to explain the problems with their submissions at Naagin (TV series). Thanks for reverting, btw. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

public seismic network for the seismometer page

Helo The garmine, this is the public seismic network which I'm talking about, based on the Raspberry Shake seismometer for Raspberry Pi: http://raspberryshake.net/stationview/. Check yourself before undoing again

Hello Sorinbotirla,I wont because it's illegal here for anyone to revert more than three edits on the same page by the same user bacause you can get blocked. And I will send you some useful info on your talk page. Also, Move that link to the "external links" section. The garmine ^(talk) 13:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

see here The garmine ^(talk) 14:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

fixed now. The garmine ^(talk) 14:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

The AFC helper script isn't working! The garmine ^(talk) 12:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

It works now. The garmine ^(talk) 12:10, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Ishtiaque Ahmed Rinvee

Ishtiaque Ahmed Rinvee is a student.

User:Ishtiaque Rinvee nothing at all except the name was there. You'll need reliable references,to prove notability, without copyright violation; and a few other things. but there wasn't even anything to tell what it is. The garmine ^(talk) 13:20, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

My submission at Articles for creation: FRIENDS - The National Association of Young People Who Stutter (June 14)

Dear garmine - you have rejected my submission stating "not adequately supported by reliable sources" yet I followed the guidance of others and cited two newspaper articles. What else would you like to see? This organization is a bonafide non-profit 501.3(c) organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasamson1 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Dasamson1: The sources are not reliable, and you need independent third party sources to show notability. If you want more help, stop by at the WP:Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 19:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you,KGirlTrucker81. I would have replied saying "not enough sources". The garmine ^(talk) 19:26, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome! KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 19:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

So an actual newspaper article from the Columbus Dispatch (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Columbus_Dispatch) is not a valid, reliable third party? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasamson1 (talk • contribs) 19:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

@Dasamson1: It's just a local newspaper that is not independent. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 19:54, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

@KGirlTrucker81 - it is precisely what I was advised to do by Wikipedia forums - Reference third parties, such as newspaper articles. It is independent of me. I can create a web site, but I cannot create a newspaper and publish articles. What on earth can I do to prove this is a real organzation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.117.145.130 (talk) 20:11, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Guys, I have to share Dasamson1's puzzlement. The Columbus Dispatch is the only daily-circulation newspaper in the 14th-largest city (by population) in the United States. Julia Oller is a nationally-syndicated writer whose articles appear in the Dispatch as well as at least 17 other publications, including US News and World Report. Her article published in the Dispatch and cited here concerned a national organization and was not strictly local coverage. You have told Dasamson1 that the cited source must be published, independent and reliable, but you have failed to explain how the cited source fails that test (and I can't imagine). That the article (I suspect) happens to also mention the contributor of the article here does not cause the source to fail the test, because the Wikipedia article is not about the contributor, it is about the organization (and does not mention the contributor, who I am assuming is not formally connected with the organization other than being a beneficiary of its services). General Ization ^Talk 20:34, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

(@Dasamson1: This is not to say that your article satisfies all the requirements for notability as it pertains to organizations. I am mainly reacting to what I think is a red herring when it comes to describing the articles you supplied as sources as "unreliable" or not "independent". But you really do need more sources from more publications to establish notability. Assuming you were trying to do the organization a favor, a bigger favor would be to suggest to them that they should start compiling major press mentions on their Web site; they have failed to include the Dispatch article there, or any other press I can find. Perhaps they can point you to other press they have received, in which case it could be cited here.) General Ization ^Talk 21:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

@Dasamson1: One last comment: no one is asking you to prove that the organization exists; you are given the benefit of the doubt that it does. The standard for inclusion in an encyclopedia is not mere existence, but notability. Please read the article at that link to gain an understanding of what that means. General Ization ^Talk 23:37, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. FRIENDS - The National Association of Young People who stutter is a volunteer organization that I am trying to help become more notable. I can add more articles for reference, such as the following, but I really did not want to do so because I wanted to protect people's privacy. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-07-24/news/ct-met-colorado-shooting-teacher-20120724_1_special-education-teacher-annual-convention-shootings I can work with the organization for a "press release" type of page on the website. I thought getting the organization on Wikipedia (like the National Stuttering Association) would be a great first step. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasamson1 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

@Dasamson1: The Chicago Tribune article does not work because it mentions the organization only in the context that someone said to be connected with the organization played a role in the aftermath of the Aurora theater shooting. It is not about the organization, and doesn't provide any verification of the claims in your article; it is completely irrelevant to the subject of the article. A press release on the organization's Web site doesn't work because it is a primary source, and not independent of the subject. I really think you need to do some more research before you make another attempt to create an article. I strongly encourage you to read the links to information about Wikipedia policies in this discussion. Creating an article in the encyclopedia is not a way to make an organization notable; you are putting the cart before the horse. General Ization ^Talk 00:16, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Okay, place any more comments on the talk page please? I came back, and there were 15 talk page notices. The garmine ^(talk) 00:59, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

The garmine, my first comment was actually intended for you and for @KGirlTrucker81. I'd appreciate an explanation of your thinking in terms of the advice you were giving the OP. General Ization ^Talk 01:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

@General Ization: The sources were not enough in the draft, as agreeing with the garmine. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

@General Ization - I was following your lead about a press release page, "a bigger favor would be to suggest to them that they should start compiling major press mentions on their Web site"... then you stated, " A press release on the organization's Web site doesn't work because it is a primary source, and not independent of the subject". I think you miss understood what I intended. I will diligently comb the web for relevant, independent, articles about our organization. Again, as you pointed out "more sources from more publications to establish notability". I would think the first two articles I cited were sufficient as those reporters contacted us for their stories, and this was precisely what others in the Wikipedia forum suggested. Perhaps this is more of what Wikipedia is looking for: http://sunny95.com/perspective/help-with-stuttering/

Our 20th annual convention in Orlando, Florida may enable me to get additional news and media coverage which may help. Thanks for your prompt feedback and guidance. I welcome your assistance navigating this process. Dasamson1 (talk) 01:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)dasamson1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasamson1 (talk • contribs)

Please take care when doing AFC reviews

You declined Draft:Tandem Michael-aldol reaction as a non-notable biography, but the draft is not a biography at all. It is about a chemical reaction. Please be more careful as a bad review such as this could be seen as WP:BITEy and chase away a potential good contributor. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:09, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

sorry, I must have hit the option above what I was trying to get. Thanks! The garmine ^(talk) 14:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Help

@The Garmine. I understand that my article Whiteplains British School was first deleted based on violation of Wikipedia policy on promotion and advertisement. But I have tried to fundamentally re-write the article to suit Wikipedian policies. I demand that the previous article be deleted, while this current one be accepted, as I have tried to include reliable independent sources for verification. Also, I have tried to remain balanced, unbiased, and neutral in my tone14:17, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Nwachinazo (talk), as I do not have any conflict of interest (COI)in the article. Therefore, I think the current article should be given a Wikipedia page as soon as possible.

@Nwachinazo: I see. What I did was remove a sandbox template as there were 2 templates, one right above the other. The garmine ^(talk) 14:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

@Nwachinazo: I did not review it, I removed a template. When it is reviewed, you will get a message on your talk page saying wether it was accepted (moved to an article) or declined (meaning there is something required before it can be accepted). The garmine ^(talk) 14:38, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

@The Germane: Hope the sandbox template you removed is not the current one, as i have tried to update the old oneNwachinazo (talk) 15:20, 16 June 2017 (UTC).

Thanks

Thanks Garmine for your review and help at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Westbury_Road_Entertainment. I did fix those errors if you can review the Wikipedia I would be highly thankful regards.96.41.37.87 (talk) 10:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

96.41.37.87 : You’re welcome! The garmine ^(talk) 14:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Request on 02:29:23, 19 June 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Charnorton

Charnorton (talk · contribs)
- User:Charnorton/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I just would like one word changed,in the article about Wicca "atheist" they are not Wiccans, in fact they are not ever a religion at all they are people who believe in non religion .My source merriam-webster.com a person who does not believe in the existence of a god or any gods : one who subscribes to or advocates atheism or a person who believes there is no God."Atheist." Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 18 June 2017. thank you -Rev High Priestess Char Norton M.W.R.

Reverend High Priestess Char Norton M.W.R. 02:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Charnorton: do you want the word "atheist" removed or replaced with another word? The garmine ^(talk)

Can you Help

	Can you Help
	Hey im sorry im trying to delete the Zen meteor post i was simply trying to prove a simple point to a friend that Wikipedia can't 100% be trusted if you can tell me how to delete the page i would be thankful. Jack896 (talk) 02:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jack896: I’m sorry,not even I can do that. Only Administrators can do that. The garmine ^(talk) 02:25, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Submission on Rene B Azurin article

Hi,

You left a comment on my submission Draft:René_B._Azurin re: fails dead end. I've edited the article and linked to other wiki pages from it. Could you kindly review?

Thanks,

Peppa.santos (talk) 19:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

sure! The garmine ^(talk) 13:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! Peppa.santos (talk) 20:36, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Rhythm Magic

Hi garmine. thanks for editing my draft. I've rewritten to address the promotional and notability issues. Will you look at the changes and make any suggestions? Thanks so much!!! Also having issues with citations... Soli58 (talk) 22:03, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

@Soli58:: sure! what do you want me to do? The garmine ^(talk) 21:54, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi again! I'm having problems with the citations. I keep changing how they're listed, but still get a red message when I'm done. Could you look at that for me? Thanks so much! Do you go by "Garmine"? Soli58 (talk) 19:49, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

@Soli58: Okay. And no, I tend "The Garmine" . The garmine ^(talk) 23:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

@Soli58: I think the error is coming from the empty parameters in the reference. The garmine ^(talk) 23:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

My submission Adán

Hello Garmine! I am Silviu,and you declined my disambiguation unfairly,,, Draft:Adán disambiguation and Adan It's not same things! Thanks you --Silviu (talk) 13:51, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

@TalismanOnline: can you tell me exactly what's the difference? The garmine ^(talk) 21:52, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Sure! But here I did mess,,, Difference was Draft:Adán disambiguation start with: Humans

Sports

Adán Balbín, born on 13 October 1986 he is a Peruvian Fotballer, he currently play for Universitaro Club and at Peru National Team.

Adán Gurdiel, born on 14 December 1993.Is a Spanish footballer who plays for SD Ponferradina.

And Adan start with People

Adan (given name)

Adan (surname)

But Theodorescu show Adan (given name) Sorry for acusing, but Adan (given name) show me names start with Adán --Silviu (talk) 06:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

@TalismanOnline::I'll see what I can do. The garmine ^(talk) 11:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

You are correct,

The text in my sandbox was just a draft for something that I plan to submit for comment only but not publish.

Excuse my ignorance as I am just a Technical Review Specialist getting ready to contribute simplified explanations of some complicated subjects on Wikipedia that I have the technical experience and knowledge to proofread and suggest any changes for your editors to consider.

Everything I say will be Scientifically correct but mostly not understood in the Scientific community.

Please feel free at ask me anything about anything. Hyper-physics, Astro-physics or anything else you would like me to explain so that even a child would understand would be a pleasure for me to contribute to.

I do not hide anything. And I do not FAKE or guess anything.

GCHQ-Mi-6 (talk) 18:48, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Jason Evan BaldwinGCHQ-Mi-6 (talk) 18:48, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

GCHQ-Mi-6: okay! The garmine ^(talk) 21:51, 27 June 2017 (UTC)