User talk:Ali Saki

Welcome!

Hello, Ali Saki, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 17:29, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Feyli (Kurdish tribe) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Feyli (Kurdish tribe). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Feyli (Kurdish tribe) was changed by علی ساکی لرستانی (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889675 on 2013-10-23T12:28:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:28, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Feylis has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Feylis was changed by علی ساکی لرستانی (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925261 on 2013-10-31T10:23:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:23, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello علی ساکی لرستانی, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Feyli (tribe) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:00, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014[edit]

Sneaky / unmotivated deletion of referenced materials regarding state persecution of mentioned people.

Hello, I'm Poepkop. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Feylis. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Poepkop (talk) 14:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Feylis. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. Poepkop (talk) 15:52, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi regarding your Feyli contribution; I rolled back because, as I wrote, there were 2 sentences (the 2 last ones of the introduction, above the table of contents) which you deleted. These sentences should remain part of the introduction, because it reflects (an aspect) of the further article content (giving readers who only read the introduction some representative idea of the rest of the article), and because it is referenced (has references / literature citations to sources, no less than 4 total). If you make changes to the article, please refrain from removing said 2 sentences about state persecution, since that is elaborated upon later in the article. Please also note that if you add lots of new text, and remove a bit of other text in one go, I cannot copy and paste relevant pieces back and forth (too tedious and error-prone), I just roll back the entire page to its previous situation in those cases. If you want to remove text, please remove, then save, and then add text and save again. Thank you. Poepkop (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Feyli. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Poepkop (talk) 16:26, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I saw I must be wrong, that is, you did not delete the 2 sentences I referred to above (those lines from the introduction), you left them in, but changed their position within the article. In that case I must say I am sorry, since my argument is therefore not valid, you did not delete those sentences, I just could not find them in the compare window so it looked like a deletion. However, upon scrutinising the changes it was there all the time. In that case, cheers. Poepkop (talk) 16:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at Feylis. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 16:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because of your blatant block evasion using 5.237.151.78 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), I have reset your block to one week from today. Next time the block will be indefinite! Favonian (talk) 18:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Feylis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your changes to this article have been repeatedly reverted by several editors. If you persist, you will be blocked indefinitely for edit warring. Favonian (talk) 20:58, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for incessant edit warring (in your own name and using IP socks) in spite of several warnings and a previous block, as you did at Feylis. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 18:38, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]