User talk:143.231.249.138/Archive 2

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to William Henry Harrison, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Chris (talk) 15:34, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sam Graves, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. 70.248.189.190 (talk) 20:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Charles Colson, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:17, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from John Noonan (analyst) with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan653 (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Noonan (analyst), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toddst1 (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at John Noonan (analyst) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 20:20, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello 143.231.249.138. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Brad Sherman, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2013

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of cities and towns in California. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Stepheng3 (talk) 21:33, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Trent Franks may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 2012. Retrieved June 18, 2013 </ref> Nevertheless, the bill still passed by a vote of 228-196.<ref>[http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/06/house-passes-bill-banning-abortion-after-20-weeks/</
• {| class="wikitable" style="margin:0.5em ; font-size:95%"

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:02, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bill Posey may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• **[[United States House SS&T Subcommittee on Oversight}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:04, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Alger Hiss

I have undone your two unexplained deletions of material on the Alger Hiss article from Sept 24 and 25th, 2013. Please do not delete content from an article without giving a valid reason either in the edit summary box, or preferably, on the talk page. Such changes can be considered vandalism.173.52.252.170 (talk) 20:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Dabo Swinney, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 17:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rob Nabors may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• man for the job,' says [United States House Committee on Appropriations|Appropriations Committee]] Chairman [[David Obey|Dave Obey]], 'and he understands the House, he understands the committee, he

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SQGibbon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Frak (expletive), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 18:21, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to UH, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 19:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Home Alone, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. K6ka (talk | contribs) 17:05, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ken Calvert, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Arbor8 (talk) 15:47, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Ken Calvert, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Arbor8 (talk) 17:58, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014

Hello. Your recent edit to Robinson Secondary School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 14:20, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Cheeseman Muncher. I noticed that you recently removed some content from United States presidential election in West Virginia, 2008 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Teh Cheezor Speak 21:20, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to United States presidential election in West Virginia, 2008 with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. James^x12345 21:24, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to United States presidential election in West Virginia, 2008 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. James^x12345 21:30, 14 May 2014 (UTC)