User talk:170.146.221.28

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

This IP address, 170.146.221.28, is registered to Automatic Data Processing and may be shared by many users of an enterprise network, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Wrath of Khan, two-dimensional thinking[edit]

Your edit summary in this edit:

Spock's line in the movie, (referring to Khan) is: "He is intelligent, but not experienced. His pattern indicates two-dimensional thinking."

The line in the article you are changing, from:

Kirk exploits Khan's inexperience in space combat and three-dimensional thinking to critically disable Reliant.

to:

Kirk exploits Khan's inexperience in space combat and two-dimensional thinking to critically disable Reliant

The meaning of the article's line, the way I read it, is "Kirk exploits Khan's inexperience in space combat and [inexperience in] three-dimensional thinking". The wording as you have changed it implies, to me, that Kirk is exploiting Khan's inexperience in two-dimensional thinking, which is not correct. Since you made the change twice, though, rather than revert it again, I've added the word "his" before "two-dimensional thinking" to try to address the ambiguity. I'm not sure the wording is ideal this way, but it's better than it was without it. I just wanted to clarify where I think you are interpreting the line differently than I am.--Fru1tbat (talk) 20:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're interpetation of the line doesn't matter. The line is quoted verbatim from the film. Don't rewrite it. SonOfThornhill (talk) 23:11, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's odd that you would use the word "verbatim" when one can fairly easily compare the actual line, quoted in a couple recent edit summaries, with the article, and plainly see they don't match exactly. I'm only interested in making the meaning accurate (and you should be too), and I don't believe the current wording accomplishes that. And yes, my interpretation does matter if it's an interpretation shared by other readers. --Fru1tbat (talk) 10:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Kevin Nolan because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 21:13, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 21:47, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Gundam Build Fighters Try, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Areaseven (talk) 00:20, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm NicoScribe. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Efren Peñaflorida have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --NicoScribe (talk) 17:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NicoScribe. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kesz Valdez have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --NicoScribe (talk) 17:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.