User talk:204.186.241.170

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

re: Rubio/Trump ranking[edit]

If you are using alphabetical order for ranking individuals who have the same number of delegates, I recommend annotating it at the top of the list to avoid confusion. Though the candidates who have one (1) delegate are clearly organized alphabetically, their popular vote numbers run most to least...which is why a disclaimer of some sort would make a lot of sense.

Krankygirl72 (talk) 22:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to La Marche (cave) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:13, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to LGBT rights in Iraq[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, LGBT rights in Iraq, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 00:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Information icon Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to LGBT rights in Uganda, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mcfar54 (talk) 23:27, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edits to LGBT in the Middle East[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, LGBT in the Middle East, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:06, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to LGBT rights in Singapore, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 21:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at LGBT rights in Singapore, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 22:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at LGBT rights in Queensland. RA0808 talkcontribs 21:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at LGBT rights in India, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. RA0808 talkcontribs 18:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Recognition of same-sex unions in India. RA0808 talkcontribs 18:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

204.186.241.170 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't think my block was justified. When I did my last edit I got a 4th level warning and then got blocked for edits made before the 4th level warning. By then I had stop editing that page and I had decided not to dispute the edits that had been undone on another page which were also done before I was given a 4th level warning. I believe because of that and also because of the fact that this is a shared IP that others using it would provide useful edits that benefit Wikipedia, I believe the IP should be unbanned.204.186.241.170 (talk) 23:19, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This IP address should have been blocked several days earlier. There's nothing inappropriate with this block. Yamla (talk) 18:58, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Auric. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Love Canal, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Auric talk 19:53, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Timothy Lincoln Beckwith. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 17:45, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Pocket pet. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Death penalty for homosexuality, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. bonadea contributions talk 18:44, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.