User talk:207.72.6.146

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm SeoMac. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Franklin High School (Livonia, Michigan) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SeoMac (talk) 01:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Clarkcj12. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Hermès, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Clarkcj12 (talk) 00:37, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:49, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vemma[edit]

Since you've made it clear on my talk page that you are in some way affiliated with Vemma, you should read about having a conflict of interest (WP:COI). Vemma's own website is not a neutral source of information about Vemma. Furthermore, a journalist's hypothetical personal lack of experience with affiliate marketing is not a criteria Wikipedia (or anybody) should use to determine the reliability of a source. The whole point of having a neutral source is that it's NOT directly involved in what it's reporting about. That's a good thing! Wikipedia isn't a platform for press releases or promotion. In the future, any further discussions of this should be held at Talk:Vemma, so that other editors can more easily find it.

It seems like you might have some additional confusion about how Wikipedia works, so I'm going to leave a standard welcome message here on your talk page, I strongly suggest you look over it carefully. Grayfell (talk) 21:19, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Greyfell,

The articles you have explain should be neutral would be credible and neutral articles if they were fact based and not opinion based. Many of the articles you attempted to site share very biased opinions as opposed to Vemma's home site which is not biased and in fact takes studies and quotes from those outside of the Vemma influence. There is very little information out there the unbiasedly covers this topic due to the fact that there is much inexperience with certain individuals in this company. I just know the facts and where to get the real information from, I neither support Vemma nor dislike it

I'm skeptical of what you're saying. For one thing, you have repeatedly referred to Vemma as being your company, implying that you are directly involved in some way with it. Are you currently an affiliate? If not, why are you referring to Boreyko as being your CEO?
As for the content of Vemma's website, if they cite outside sources, YOU should be citing outside sources. I've been trying to underscore the importance of WP:SECONDARY sources. Do you understand why this is so important? You can't just say that the sources I included are biased about Vemma without explaining how they're biased. Having opinions you don't agree with doesn't make something biased. Just saying that they're biased somehow, and therefor we should just trust Vemma completely, is ridiculous. Boreyko is going to say what he thinks is best for his business, that's why we rely on secondary sources.
Please address the issues I have raised at Talk:Vemma, or I will revert to the MLM wording. Grayfell (talk) 23:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greyfell,

First off the sources you claim that Vemma is accused of a pyramids scheme are very biased and falsely reported. For example, if a report form the NY post does not even spell the word "Verve" right. I do not think the source did a good job at writing the article. Not to mention that truth in advertising is an organization who's mission is to criticize every company, so that information in itself is extremely biased and goes against what you deem to be accurate. Any information that comes from Vemma itself would be the closest relative to the companies structure and attributes.

You obviously have a false bias about this company. I say "our CEO" and my company because I am a customer of Vemma products but not an affiliate. If you need clarification on those terms or any information, message me and I will be happy to clear it up.

Please don't insert you comments in the middle of mine, that misrepresents what I am saying. Also, please sign your talk-page posts by typing four tildes (~~~~), as is explained in the welcome message.
Sure, you're a customer of a company that strongly encourages membership to purchase products that are not available in any regular store, but are not an affiliate. Even if I believed that, you would still have a conflict of interest. Truth in Advertising's mission isn't to 'criticize every company'. They report instances of advertising they find to by deceptive. The fact that they chose Vemma doesn't make them biased.
How did the NY Post misspell 'Verve'? Do you really expect them to use the exclamation mark after every use? Newspapers have manuals of style that dictate these things, just like Wikipedia does: MOS:TM.
You have not acknowledged what I am saying about WP:PRIMARY sources. This is not my opinion, this is a crucial Wikipedia policy! We don't trust Vemma to be the sole source of info about Vemma. It's that simple.
As for Vemma being accused of being a pyramid scheme, did you actually read that article? It's saying that the FTC hasn't had the resources to investigate MLM businesses (like Vemma) in the past, but that might change soon. The fact that they still exist has nothing to do with the current legality of their business model. Grayfell (talk) 00:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greyfell,

Firstly if you look back at the date the NY Post originally posted that article various misspellings and such were made. Not to mention that this specific article only covered one aspect of the issue of Vemma and whether it was a pyramid scheme without getting information to prove that it might not be. Issues that not reported to keep a bias in an article is known as 'objective reporting' and not only is it not correct reporting in the news world but it is frowned upon in the media world.

Remember also that TINA is an organization that is also biased against Vemma, if you recall i posted and maybe wrongly so a business for home article that you claimed was not credible and was biased. TINA is the same way just biased in the opposite direction yet that information is ok with you? That makes no sense.

And on the note of the FTC, You should check out the link at the bottom that the FTC came out with, from the governments website! It explains the real way the FTC determines if MLM's (which Vemma is not anymore after today officially) are legitimate or not. Part of that is talking about customer bases, which i am one of Vemma so therefore I am part of that customer base. And even if magically so, whether something "would" or "might" change soon does not mean Vemma is a fraud company today. So claiming is is currently on your site is incorrect. The business model in itself had been used by Avon, Cutco, Vector, Beach Body, etc. and none of those seem to be of any discussion by you as schemes. So the legality of the business model should not be in question since they are part of the same industry that has been around for multiple decades with no trouble. As mentioned current FTC guidelines can be found below, take a look.

And also i included a link showing that when you buy a business builder from Vemma, it is now being called and affiliate pack.

Thank you, 207.72.6.146 (talk) 20:28, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.business.ftc.gov/documents/inv08-bottom-line-about-multi-level-marketing-plans

https://www.vemma.com/store/index.cfm?fuseAction=dspProductSelection

Since this is about content, I think Talk:Vemma is the proper place to discuss this. Grayfell (talk) 00:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (207.72.6.146) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Grayfell (talk) 21:19, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Fluffernutter. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Vemma, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:29, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vemma[edit]

Press releases, such as the one republished by CNBC you've been using, are not suitable sources for the changes you have made to the article. I have started a discussion at Talk:Vemma, please join in rather than edit war. Grayfell (talk) 01:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Vemma. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 04:01, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Vemma, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 00:11, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tory Lanez because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 05:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your draft article, Draft:Jake Bayer[edit]

Hello, 207.72.6.146. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jake Bayer".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 13:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello 207.72.6.146, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Jeffrey Docking have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Baby (musical)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 17:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jeffrey Docking has been reverted.
Your edit here to Jeffrey Docking was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/crisisinhighereducation) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello 207.72.6.146, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Jeffrey Docking have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:25, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Adrian College— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 19:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some Clarification...[edit]

Hi, I don't really know how to edit Wikipedia, so I hope this works. I just want to make it clear that this IP address and any edits associated with it belong to a college (I bet you can assume which one based on past edits...) and this talk page is likely rarely checked, if at all. I don't know if this information is helpful to anyone, but I thought I would mention it. Many different people are making the edits associated with this IP, and most of them probably don't know how to properly edit Wikipedia, including myself. Happy researching everyone!

207.72.6.146 (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm DatGuy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Khalid (singer)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Dat GuyTalkContribs 20:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Viewratio. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Making a Murderer seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Viewratio (talk) 18:59, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Kpgjhpjm. I noticed that you recently removed content from Calabasas High School without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kpgjhpjm 04:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2022[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Jeffrey Docking has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:55, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:207.72.6.146&oldid=1119269376"