User talk:24.149.152.162

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Glee (TV series) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   15:04, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Vampire Diaries. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Vampire Diaries was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954985 on 2011-01-06T15:06:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Vampire Diaries. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:08, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Prostitution in Sweden, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Prostitution in Sweden was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954157 on 2011-01-06T19:12:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Civil Rights Act of 1866, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Civil Rights Act of 1866 was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.977505 on 2011-01-14T18:54:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:54, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Civil and political rights. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

02:35, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dublin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dublin was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96967 on 2011-02-11T19:38:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Slang constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Kevinmon•talk•trib 19:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Daramulum, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ww2censor (talk) 19:51, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Aldo Leopold has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Karenjc 20:31, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011[edit]

Your recent edit to the page History of Andorra appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. — Kralizec! (talk) 12:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Roald Dahl, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Grito de Dolores, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Grito de Dolores was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9374 on 2011-05-05T16:03:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Roald Dahl, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 16:40, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Benjamin C. Bradlee, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Benjamin C. Bradlee was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958214 on 2011-09-12T12:55:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Khufu with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rcsprinter (talk) 16:09, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wentworth Cheswell with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trusilver 18:32, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Saint-Sylvestre coup d'état, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 17:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Moses Sithole, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Moses Sithole was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921217 on 2011-10-27T17:21:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:21, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Moses Sithole with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Crazynas t 17:28, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jerry Uelsmann, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jerry Uelsmann was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.983237 on 2011-11-07T15:40:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jerry Uelsmann. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hostager 19:50, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jerry Uelsmann with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. RA0808 talkcontribs 19:54, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jerry Uelsmann. Wknight94 talk 19:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alvin Langdon Coburn with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:42, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fine-art photography, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Fine-art photography was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872435 on 2011-12-12T19:39:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fine-art photography with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Calabe1992 19:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tynisha Keli, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tynisha Keli was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96356 on 2012-02-13T14:16:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pearl Primus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Closedmouth (talk) 15:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Testing cosmetics on animals, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Testing cosmetics on animals was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964707 on 2012-05-02T18:33:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Speculation, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Speculation was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950985 on 2012-06-21T18:19:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Timeline of the Salem witch trials, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Wikipelli Talk 19:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you for your contribution to List of inventors, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. SchreyP (messages) 20:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of inventors with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk 17:58, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. NTox · talk 18:34, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 16:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Michaelzeng7. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of physicists because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 18:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Anaxial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Satanism without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Anaxial (talk) 14:04, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Haemophilia in European royalty. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Fraggle81 (talk) 16:28, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Philip Bazaar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Philip Bazaar was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961746 on 2013-03-27T18:48:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Stefan Janoski. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Detective. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Kolbasz (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Pinethicket. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Science and inventions of Leonardo da Vinci because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Pinethicket (talk) 17:34, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oddbodz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Ostrich guitar, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Oddbodz (talk) 18:55, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethdhelwen (talk • contribs) 19:15, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm JaconaFrere. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Wonder Woman because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jacona (talk) 18:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Nitroglycerin, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk 16:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nitro (Adlabs Imagica) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 16:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2014 Indianapolis 500, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: 2014 Indianapolis 500 was changed by 24.149.152.162 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852021 on 2014-05-30T16:05:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:06, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wernher von Braun has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24.149.152.162&oldid=1141658841"