User talk:2604:2000:E010:1100:68A0:D758:F52B:2D8B

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — MarkH21talk 01:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Tel Aviv University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — MarkH21talk 01:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please explain - as my last edit was a compromise edit that I had never made before, ever, how that triggers such a warning. Plus - as to the substance of the edit, see my comments. You have failed here to supply a policy supporting your personal preference, and all across the project it is clear that your notion is not the norm.2604:2000:E010:1100:68A0:D758:F52B:2D8B (talk) 01:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You continued to revert despite the fact that a talk page discussion was opened at Talk:Tel Aviv University#Adding and linking nationalities/citizenship in list entries directly pinging you. That's edit-warring. Please read the policy clearly, it doesn’t matter if you have not made that exact edit before:

An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.

MarkH21talk 01:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I made a different edit. Not an edit I had ever made before. In an effort to compromise. I would urge you to compromise as well, while it may not be your preference, in the holiday spirit and all that, and then grab a glass of grog and we can cheer each other from afar. Not because I for a moment thought you were correct. But because it is stupid to waste so much time with someone who is not thinking this through in accord with what I have pointed out and willing to be flexible, and who would seem to be happy wasting both of our time over linking. But you are clearly incorrect on the linking. This is not what that MOS points to at all. Had I linked "United States," you would be correct.
BTW - as I made the first edit, and you made the first revert -- are you not one revert ahead of me?2604:2000:E010:1100:68A0:D758:F52B:2D8B (talk) 01:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is Avigdorov's connection to Tiberias?[edit]

Hi. Here you have added Avraham Avigdorov as a notable resident of Tiberias. He was born at Mitzpa, not Tiberias, studied at Mikveh Israel, is buried in Herzliya. What is his connection to Tiberias? Did his family/his mother move there from Mitzpa, or did he go to school there? If you cannot present some argument, preferably supported by a source in whatever language, I'm afraid I'll have to remove him form the Tiberias page and move his photo to the Mitzpa page. Please continue the conversation on the talk-page (Talk:Tiberias#What is Avigdorov's connection to Tiberias?), where I have started a paragraph regarding this. Thank you and have a nice day, Arminden (talk) 23:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Bernsley[edit]

David Bernsley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Youngjtdyt (talk) 17:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]