User talk:Abdullah Ahsan Mumtaz
Welcome![edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for contributing edits that were made in good faith, but have been deemed not to contribute positively to the article. These edits have thus been reverted. Wikipedia's page on unacceptable additions may explain why. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.
Some good links for newcomers are:
- Help contents – the main help page.
- Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to create your first article
- Tutorial
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out the Teahouse, ask the Help Desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Once again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 16:04, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Economy of Jamshedpur, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:57, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chero dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 16:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Jamshedpur[edit]
There's no way Jamshedpur would meet the GA criteria so I don't why are you nominating it. Making an article GA isn't going to take a day of so; it takes a lot of time; usually takes months of effort. First of all, the grammar; it's very promotional and in the climate section, that live mint source doesn't even barely mention the koppen criteria; just talks about workers. Simply slapping on references for the sake of making it reference doesn't automatically a GA article. So many of these claims are not even backed up by the citations provided (e.g. the claim "Because it plays an important role in both the World Wars towards India and other places", i cannot find that claim in the Foreign Policy source. Similarly the claim that "is the largest city in Indian state of Jharkhand and first planned industrial city in India" using The Hindu source never mentions as the first or largest city in Jharkhand; this is improper synthesis and unsoruced information and misusing citations just for making it look like it is cited. Secondly, looks of unreliable sources. Livemint seems questionable, world population review in place of Indian Census data. Ssbbplayer (talk) 15:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- OK Sssbplayer As your wish Let's work together please. Abdullah Ahsan Mumtaz 8:01, 04 February 2021 (UTC)
The article List of tourist attractions in Jamshedpur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Another unneeded fork of Jamshedpur. It is not necessary to create a new article for every section in the main article. Created by suspected sockpuppet.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 13:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Electronic Manufacturing Cluster, Jamshedpur for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic Manufacturing Cluster, Jamshedpur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.