User talk:Albatalad

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Albatalad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:01, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Central Europe, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:35, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

Hi. You published that file as "I, the copyright holder of this work" which is clearly a problem as the file can only be used if the work is in the public domain because according to the Copyright Law of Serbia work is not copyrighted if the work consists of official materials of state bodies and bodies performing public functions.

I appreciate your effort to scan your passport cover but the copyright laws are very strictly enforced on Commons and sooner or later your file will be deleted as I've seen dozens of similar files deleted on Commons recently. So for your own sake, don't wait for the disappointment and accept that this website has some very strict views on the matter. I personally think these views are too strict, but my own opinion does not change the facts.--Twofortnights (talk) 23:09, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eastern Orthodox Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Nicholas Cathedral. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian passport[edit]

OK so I've looked it up and it's definitely true that your passport scan has colours that are off. Funnily I used this as a reference, but it shows that the passport doesn't have the gray tint like in your scan.

Now I have nothing against Wikipedia using your personal scan, but it should be at least as good as the official original and also it should faithfully represent the colour which is maroon or burgundy. So if you intend to use your passport scan please rescan it.

Your version on average is the colour on the left while the official scan average colour is on the right.

Now hold your passport against the screen and check which one is more like it. Honestly I don't know any country that prints passport in the colour on the left--Twofortnights (talk) 15:04, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, so you are Serbian after all ha? In that case i would suggest that you scan your own passport and post of a photo of it... BTW mine is not a scan, it's a photo.Albatalad (talk) 18:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK so i fixed the contrast and the brightness File:SrpskiPasoš.jpg

No that's not me, that's Steven Seagal, a famous martial artist/actor from the 1980s. Anyway, the new version looks better, thank you. I suspected it wasn't a scan because it's very hard to scan a passport cover without gold/silver letters showing distorted. For example scan File:Indonesian E-Passport.jpg vs. photo of Indonesian passport. Btw since you happen to live in that part of the world do you perhaps have better looking passport stamps of Albania and Macedonia to be used in this article - Gallery of passport stamps by country or territory? Thanks!--Twofortnights (talk) 19:23, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I live in Australia actually... i have never been to Albania or Macedonia, i suspected you are Serbian because you read B92 news.Albatalad (talk) 19:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah OK. Well if you have any interesting passport stamps from Oceania or elsewhere scan them and add them to that article please. And no I don't read it, that link comes from this article [1] which comes as a first suggestion from Google News when you Google "Serbian passport". Quite an interesting character, I wonder what he is doing cruising around Eastern Europe so much.--Twofortnights (talk) 19:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serbia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tekija. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright image on Accession of Serbia to the European Union[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one of your recent file uploads, such as your addition to Accession of Serbia to the European Union, had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 20:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm totally aware of this and i regret previous copyright violation and won't repeat it, the current image DOES NOT violate copyrights, if you think it does you must prove it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Albatalad (talk • contribs) 20:07, 7 February 2016‎

Right off the bat I would ask you to remain civil. Your edit descriptions currently do not reflect this behaviour, so I'm asking you to consider this. And as a matter of fact I have located the source of this file: it's a screenshot from this video, which is very much copyrighted. So here is what's going to happen: I'm going to remove the image once more, and I'm going to have it removed from the Commons as well. I would highly advise against adding it back to the article. You've already dared me to find the source of this image, and I have. So my sincere suggestion would be to not tempt me again.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 20:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK just a heads up, i am a noob when it comes to copyrights, anyway, i believe there is no need for an image in that article!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Albatalad (talk • contribs) 20:35, 7 February 2016Albatalad (talk) 21:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rule of thumb: anything which doesn't grant you explicit permission for use, cannot be used. Copyright laws the world over are set up in such a way that every work is always copyright unless the author specifically relinquishes it for a given instance.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 20:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--John (talk) 20:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Albatalad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Romania[edit]

I am quite willing to discuss whether Romania should be removed from their Central European lists in WP. The Geography of Romania article states Romania is in Southeastern Europe and says nothing about Central Europe. Thanks Hmains (talk) 03:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Albatalad. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Albatalad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Albatalad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]