User talk:Alexmoulden

June 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to LPS has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: LPS was changed by Alexmoulden (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2018-06-18T21:24:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:24, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexmoulden, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Alexmoulden! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Be very careful[edit]

If you continue to make WP:UNCONSTRUCTIVE edits like those you keep making to LPS, you may find yourself blocked. Narky Blert (talk) 19:49, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the spam content to Draft:LPS (company). You can continue to work on the article there, until it meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion in mainspace. bd2412 T 20:18, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexmoulden (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the text I am adding to the wiki page lps is trademarked and owned by my company and the text I'm adding relates to the trademarked LPS word Alexmoulden (talk) 22:32, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexmoulden (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the text I am adding to the wiki page lps is trademarked and owned by my company and the text I'm adding relates to the trademarked LPS word that I keep having to readd as users keep taking it away even though we own/ have trademarked this word Alexmoulden (talk) 22:32, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block, which is your promotional editing. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 22:39, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As an aside, you cannot simply add copyrighted/trademarked content to Wikipedia. Note that at the bottom of every edit window it states "By publishing changes, you agree to the Terms of Use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license." If you wish to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia(and understand what doing so means), you may visit WP:DCP. Note that any donated content must still serve an encyclopedic purpose- which does not include promotion. 331dot (talk) 22:39, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexmoulden (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the text I am adding to the wiki page lps is trademarked and owned by my company and the text I'm adding relates to the trademarked LPS word Alexmoulden (talk) 22:32, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alexmoulden (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I find main users on here not very helpful and boarderline bullying to be honest first time user and you just block me rather then helping. Have emailed wikipedia to buy this phrase as we own the use of the word simialar to how mcdoanlds owns their word. Alexmoulden (talk) 22:32, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Let me see if I can better help you understand. In order for a subject to be at a particular title, it must be the primary topic of that title. For this reason, although "Apple" and "Amazon" are two of the biggest companies in the world, Apple is still an article on the fruit (with the company being at Apple, Inc.), and Amazon is a disambiguation page (with the company being at Amazon.com). Like Amazon, LPS is a disambiguation page listing multiple topics by that name, and specific concepts or entities by that name must be at disambiguated titles. That is why I have moved the content that you provided to Draft:LPS (company), where you can develop it until it is of sufficient quality to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia. bd2412 T 01:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:LPS (company)[edit]

Hello, Alexmoulden. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LPS".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]