User talk:Allyriana000

Allyriana000, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Allyriana000! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Binibining Pilipinas 1997 has been accepted

Binibining Pilipinas 1997, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 00:01, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Binibining Pilipinas 1995 has been accepted

Binibining Pilipinas 1995, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 21:56, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Binibining Pilipinas 1996 has been accepted

Binibining Pilipinas 1996, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 21:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Binibining Pilipinas 1994 has been accepted

Binibining Pilipinas 1994, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 11:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Binibining Pilipinas 1993 (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Binibining Pilipinas 1993 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Binibining Pilipinas 1993, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:51, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hello, I'm Bri. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mutya Pilipinas 2019, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:46, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of sovereign states in the 1890s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sampa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Colombia 2010, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cartagena.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mutya ng Pilipinas 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Reid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Miss Globe 2021 (March 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: See Miss Globe International. Three different "Miss Globe" organisations, none of them individually notable, so the contest for one of them in a specific year is definitely not going to be notable.

bonadea contributions talk 18:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Binibining Pilipinas 1964 has been accepted

Binibining Pilipinas 1964, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 08:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

User:Angellka Shurtschen

Good evening my fellow editor, this user Angellka Shurtschen (talk · contribs), has been vandalizing the article "Miss Universe 2022", and used cursed words to comment. She have also been saying that we're "blind" and "lazy". I tried to talk to her but she didn't respond. Here is the message:

B. L. I. N. D

Y'all so blind!!! Y'all so blind because u are all lazy. I said SEARCH it in WIKIPEDIA or GOOGLE about the references since I can't add it to my reference since I'm editing via phone. One day, you'll see that UAE we'll be joining that pageant and I know that and once you see that you'll never be sorry. I know I have a bad record in this WIKI, but please I found real one. Now, if y'all don't search that and you don't gimme permission to put UAE at MU 22 page, then y'all so unapologetically and meanie! y'all never showed me warm welcome. TYSMFHG!! Angellka Shurtschen (talk) 09:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

@Angellka Shurtschen: What do you mean we're blind, your references about Miss Universe UAE is about the first "Top 15" contestants which was for 2021. And, there is no response to the organization about the re-continued debut of the United Arab Emirates in Miss Universe. Plus, you are just using an "article" to gain information. You should know that Wikipedia is not a reliable source, as I already said that in the talk page of Miss Universe 2022. We didn't even get a response from you there even I pinged you. Again, for the last time, do not add content without proof, real proof, and never ever use references, which pointing about 2021 events, and using Wikipedia articles, as sources. The community warned you the other day, but now this is your second warning. You maybe blocked or banned in editing Wikipedia, as I keep repeating to tell that. Edit wars are a threat to the community, so we try our best to avoid it. And by the way, please avoid using bad or cursed words on commenting to talk pages and edit summaries, coz' Wikipedia is not a swearing place. We hope you understand all the policies of Wikipedia. Good day to you. LikeRealTimes ^{I got you a message!📩} 13:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

"IF U THINK THATS FAKE THEN F*CK YOURSELF YOU MEAN'", "LOOK MOTHERF*CKER", these are the words you said in one of the archives in the history page of "Miss Universe 2022". As I said, you keep using these words to gain attention to editors and administrators that your content is a reality. You need to stop that attitude. LikeRealTimes ^{I got you a message!📩} 13:26, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

That's all of it. I'm just saying that you need to help me talk to her about her behavior in "vandalizing" and "swearing". I have also contacted User:Milesq to help. Good day. LikeRealTimes ^{I got you a message!📩} 13:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Okay, do not worry I will help you talk to that user. I actually contacted an administrator about this issue and the reply is that the actions of this user in the Miss Universe 2022 page is not yet considered vandalism, it is a different case. However, I've checked the user's contributions and saw a lot of vandalism especially at Miss Dominican Republic 2009. I also saw the user's response to your message but I cannot decipher it. I've already encountered a vandal who does profanity and curse words especially at the edit summary so no worries, I will help you.

Thank you for bringing this up to my talk page! Allyriana000 (talk) 14:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Okay, so the user seems to be blocked indefinitely already. Allyriana000 (talk) 17:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Binibining Pilipinas 1992 has been accepted

Binibining Pilipinas 1992, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 07:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

More background sections on Miss Universe pageants

Hello there, Allyriana000. Thanks for adding more information from every Background sections in each Miss Universe pageants by year, but you need to keep adding more of these section in previous pageants starting from 2012. You will have an amazing time but do not forget to always add sources when needed. Thank you. LikeRealTimes ^{I got you a message!📩} 05:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Seems like the Background section has been added in 2012, but remove the Notes section and start creating the Selection of participants sub-section in the Background section. Thanks. LikeRealTimes ^{I got you a message!📩} 05:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

@User:LikeRealTimes thank you for acknowledging my hard work in adding more information about the Miss Universe pages. I am also currently working on the Tagalog Wikipedia articles of Miss Universe pageants by year since those articles need more attention especially Miss Universe 2019 backwards. I will start editing Miss Universe 2012 as soon as I finish the Tagalog Wikipedia article of Miss Universe 2020. I hope that you could also help me edit the Tagalog Wikipedia articles of Miss Universe. Thank you and god bless! Allyriana000 (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for you editing at Miss Universe 2012, but as I said, we need more background sections starting from previous pageants of 2012, in which you were already done there, to any year down below. You can continue to edit at Miss Universe 2011, and 2010, and so on. Hope you have a fantastic day of great editing experience. Good day. LikeRealTimes ^{I got you a message!📩} 06:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes I will, but I wish you could help me as well since I will not be editing in Wikipedia forever. I am only planning to edit at Wikipedia for three years since I also have to focus at my studies. 2011 to 1952 is very long and tiring and I cannot do all of it unfortunately. However, thank you for appreciating my edits at Miss Universe! Allyriana000 (talk) 10:31, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Allyriana000! Some trolls are vandalizing Miss World 2013, especially on the results. They keep replacing Philippines with India and swapping those two countries in their respective placements. India being the winner, while the Philippines being a semifinalists. This also happened on the Order of Announcements, where they keep replacing all Top 20 countries with India. This violates WP:VD. Please help me stop them vandalizing the article. Have a good day. LikeRealTimes ^{I got you a message!📩} 23:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

You can see the edit summary here, so you can also see the edits these trolls have made. Thanks. LikeRealTimes ^{I got you a message!📩} 23:53, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Hmmm, seems like a lot of trolls have vandalized the page. I think you should message an administrator (like I always do) to report a troll that vandalizes the Miss World 2013 page. Also, maybe you could request for the article to be semi-protected as well. Allyriana000 (talk) 23:57, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

@LikeRealTimes, can you do the Background section for the Miss Universe 2006 and Miss Universe 2004 articles? I am currently busy due to some family affairs and it is only a month before the start of classes which makes it difficult for me to find time to finish the Miss Universe 2007 article. Rest assured, the Miss Universe 2007 article will be finished soon. Thank you! Allyriana000 (talk) 03:33, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Le Nouvelliste.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Current consensus on formatting, beauty pageants or anything else

I don't know if you saw my edit summary at Binibining Pilipinas 2021, so I'm repeating it here. If you want to change the Manual of Style, you are welcome to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Text formatting#Beauty pageants and special formatting?, but until consensus to do so is reached, adding boldface is disruptive editing. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:41, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

I'll take note of this. Thank you for reaching out to me. Allyriana000 (talk) 03:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks by the way for adding references to articles. Some of them really need it. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:19, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Anna Sueangam-iam

Hello! Allyriana000. Can you please help me finish this draft, Draft:Anna Sueangam-iam. You can cite sources when needed and improve her status. Thanks! LikeRealTimes ^{I got you a message!📩} 04:45, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Binibining Pilipinas 1991 has been accepted

Binibining Pilipinas 1991, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Danidamiobi (talk) 05:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Allyriana000. Thank you for your work on Binibining Pilipinas 1991. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Miss World beauty pageants

Hello Allyrianna000,

I have noticed that you have shortened the names of the Miss World contestants in the past editions. What is your reason behind this purpose? I need to know. Thank you! Raymarcbadz (talk) 20:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello! In articles such as Miss Universe, Miss World, we always use their popular name so that it wouldn't create such confusion. We do not know Pilín León as Carmen Josefina León Crespo or Ulla Weigerstorfer as Ulrike Weigerstorfer. We use their shortened name or their popular name so that it wouldn't cause such confusion and the article could be navigated easily. Allyriana000 (talk) 21:30, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Please focus on the present-year articles instead. For the past editions, please discuss it on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Beauty Pageants. Do you want their names to be shortened similarly to the current year across all editions? Raymarcbadz (talk) 20:52, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Template:Miss Universe countries and territories

Hi, I'm Milesq and I'd like to hear your opinion on Template talk:Miss Universe countries and territories to see as to how long as a country should be absent in order to be categorized under the Inactive tab. I hope with that we can reach the consensus applicable for all parties involved. Milesq (talk) 11:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Miss Globe 2021

Hello, Allyriana000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Miss Globe 2021, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Miss World 2023

Please stop remove that the first time to be held in the United Arab Emirates because i am really correct and i am really true but i am not lying thanks. Joseatienza (talk) 15:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Check your grammar first before you come for me. Thank you! Allyriana000 (talk) 15:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

please do not remove that the first time because the united arab emirates for the first time in miss world history thanks! Joseatienza (talk) 15:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

It was not the first time. 1995 was the first time when it happened in Dubai and Johannesburg. Allyriana000 (talk) 15:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Miss World 2023 to be held in the united arab emirates for the first time in miss world history thank you! Joseatienza (talk) 15:33, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Nope, it was 1995. Allyriana000 (talk) 15:36, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Nope but Miss World 1995 was held in South Africa Joseatienza (talk) 15:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

And if you really want to add the "for the first time" thing, why is that phrase not present in Miss World 2021 when it happened in Puerto Rico for the first time? Where is that phrase when Hong Kong first hosted the pageant in 1989? Where is that phrase when South Africa hosted the pageant in 1992? The thing is, that phrase will only be present if it is the continent's first time to host the pageant, not the country. So stop with the edit war that you're trying to create and improve your editing. And stop calling yourself a dictator, you're just an editor, a Wikipedia editor. Allyriana000 (talk) 15:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Hi Allyriana000! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Miss World 2023 several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Miss World 2023, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Allyriana000,

Please do not get into an edit-war on an article even if you completely believe that you are undoing bad edits. It's good to discuss differences of opinion on article talk page or user talk pages. There are limited situations that permit repeatedly reverting another editor's edits (vandalism, copyright violations, BLP-violating content) but needing to be right isn't one of them. I've already given the other editor a short block and I hope you both change the way you are handling the content disagreements in the future. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:25, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Okay, I'll take note of this. I apologize for the inappropriate behavior that I have caused. Allyriana000 (talk) 01:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Good Evening! Dios Marhay nga Adlaw saindo gabos! Hi I'm Editscontent! I just want to let you know that I'm Changing the Representation of the Delegates on Bb. Pilipinas. I'm not changing it as vandalism I just justify what their Representing. Thanks! Dios Mabalos! Editscontent2.9 (talk) 13:12, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

If you want to change it, check the videos themselves of the candidates introducing themselves at YouTube. Allyriana000 (talk) 14:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

And the column for City/Province is only for a city or a province, not part of a city. If a candidate mentioned Sta. Mesa, Manila, only Manila will be stated. Allyriana000 (talk) 14:56, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

I checked them on YouTube they mentioned some Districts on their City what their representing Example: “Santa Mesa” she mentioned it Dios Mabalos! Editscontent2.9 (talk) 02:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

I will change it to City/District/Province. Thanks. Editscontent2.9 (talk) 02:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Maupay nga Adlaw saiyo nga Tanan! Yes. I viewed it on YouTube They mentioned it while they do introduction, and they used Sashes on the Delegates too. Editscontent2.9 (talk) 02:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Just change it to Represented so that it will be in general. Allyriana000 (talk) 04:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Why Upcomming Pageants are removed at Miss Universe 2023

Hi Allyrina! Something's going on right now a Miss Universe 2023, someone's saying the links for the upcoming pageants were relevant, can you please help? Thank you veru much for reading. Hitsme (talk) 00:11, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

I could ask those who removed the section, but don't put faith into it since those users are actually higher than me. For now, that section is still available in articles from other languages especially the Tagalog version which I am actively editing on. Allyriana000 (talk) 00:27, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

The contestants table and the results table for Miss World 2001 were gone

hello Allyrina! We have just a slight problem, one user named Bri was removing somethings and she will report us, can you help? Hitsme (talk) 15:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, its Allyriana. I think we should add references first to the table before adding it back. Allyriana000 (talk) 16:34, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I've added the Results and the Contestants table again, with slight modifications for the former and major modifications for the latter. Feel free to add the other contestants and provide reliable source. Global Beauties and Sashes And Scripts are not reliable sources. Thank you and Good Day! Allyriana000 (talk) 17:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Reintroducing unreferenced material at Miss World Philippines 2022

Hi Allyriana000, I'm concerned about your revert that introduced a great deal of unreferenced material. First of all, you provided no edit summary to explain why, which is rather un-collegial and actually rude to co-editors. Would you mind going to Talk:Miss World Philippines 2022 and explaining why you think unreferenced material should be in the article, against WP:V policy? ☆ Bri (talk) 15:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

I just noticed that you added a citation when you restored the table, which is good. The comment about not providing an edit summary still stands. Please use those edit summaries to explain what you are doing to avoid situations like this. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

I apologize, however I already have a reference found at Philippine Star for the other semi-finalists. I will add it right now. Allyriana000 (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

And by the way, the Rappler reference also had Felizarta and Chan in it (the runners-up), but you still removed their respective rows? Allyriana000 (talk) 16:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Whoops, didn't see that the Rappler article continued for a sentence or two one sentence after the ad. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I removed the Contestants table at Miss World 2016 since the two references were not reliable. Allyriana000 (talk) 05:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Those were the two sources left. Allyriana000 (talk) 05:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Changes at Miss World 1978

Hi Allyriana! I made some changes at the Miss World 1978 article, and currently i'm going to add the background section of Miss World 1978, free feel to check it out! Hitsme (talk) 02:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

I do really appreciate this, but I think you should really focus at the 2010s articles because majority of your edits are unreferenced and that is against the rules of Wikipedia. Allyriana000 (talk) 11:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Good day, @Hitsme. I hope you continue making changes for the Background section of the Miss World/Miss Universe articles, since it would really help to make those articles be more encyclopedic. Thank you! Allyriana000 (talk) 01:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Your welcome! Hitsme (talk) 04:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

@Hitsme, you haven't continued making changes and majority of the Miss Universe articles has lost their unreferenced content/ was turned into redirect pages. Allyriana000 (talk) 14:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi! So sorry for not editing the Miss Universe/World articles, I was busy with school on the past few days and couldn't have any motivation on editing. Hitsme (talk) 01:58, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Is Norway still counted as a contestant at Miss Universe 2022? And opinions about the Miss Grand International 2023 article?

Someone added Norway to the withdrawals list. I'm not sure if I should redo his/her edit or keep it as it was. I was confused if this country is still counted as a contestant or not. Let me know if you already have an answer. Thanks! LikeRealTimes (talk) 05:01, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

And by the way, can you state your opinion on Miss Grand International 2023? The article is kinda a bit too "overdetailed". LikeRealTimes (talk) 05:04, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

For the case of Miss Universe Norway, you have to keep it as is since Norway withdrew despite being judged at the preliminaries. As for Miss Grand International 2023, as well as other Miss Grand articles, for me, yes it is too overdetailed and I wish you could do something about it. It is also a case of notability, and I believe Miss Grand International is not a notable event. I always consider the top four international beauty pageants as the only notable ones. Allyriana000 (talk) 08:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Miss World 2023 will be held in India for the Second Time to Host Country

Please stop remove that marking the second time for the host country to stage the final because Julia Morley was announced for the 71st edition of miss world later this year will be held in india for the second time after the 46th edition of miss world in 1996 that is true. If you continue to remove that marking the second time for the host country to stage the final i will be blocked you. ☆ Joseatienza (talk) 23:35, 7 July 2023 (PHT)

I think you're the one that should be blocked because of your unsourced, unreferenced edits. Only administrators have the power to block people. Allyriana000 (talk) 12:08, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Please stop remove that but If you continue to remove that marking the second time for the host country to stage the final you may be blocked. ☆ Joseatienza (talk) 14:23, 8 July 2023 (PHT)

I am really not unsourced but please stop to remove that the second time to host country for Miss World 2023 Joseatienza (talk) 06:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

I mentioned you at the talk page of @Liz. Good day. Allyriana000 (talk) 07:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Please stop remove that the second time to host country for Miss World 2023 because i will be followed and that is true thanks. Joseatienza (talk) 11:33, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Nope. Allyriana000 (talk) 11:49, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

I mentioned you at the talk page of the article Miss World 2023. Allyriana000 (talk) 21:28, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Hi Allyriana000! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Miss World 2023 several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Miss World 2023, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Noted @Liz. I'm so sorry my impulse got me again. Thank you for suggesting me this. Allyriana000 (talk) 21:15, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss World 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Miss Universe 2023

Good day, I'd like to talk to you regarding the issue of having nonreliable sources being used frequently in Miss Universe 2023 recently, if you have time, pl3ase visit the talk page. Thank you! Milesq (talk) 03:35, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Miss South Africa 2023

I have removed your entry of Bryoni going to Miss Universe in November, as it has not been formally announced who will represent them. As Natasha Joubert, the new Miss South Africa, competed at Miss Universe 2020, it is generally assumed she will not compete. However, the Miss South Africa and Miss Universe organizations have not confirmed who will go.

I am not doing this to be rude, but we want the correct information to be posted, when it’s announced.

Have a great day!

Heidi Heidi bradshaw (talk) 02:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I wasn't the one who added Bryoni at the contestants table. But its okay, we'll wait for their official announcement. Allyriana000 (talk) 02:44, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

But the selection of participants section must remain unchanged since a runner-up will fill the position as Miss Universe South Africa, even if it is not Bryoni. Allyriana000 (talk) 02:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Miss Universe 2023 contestants bio pages

Hi Ally! I just came from editing the bio page of Madison Kvaltin. The user who created it made some several mistakes, and this article isn't the only one he/she made. More articles like Priyanka Annuncia and Lilja Pétursdóttir were his/her creations and all of their similarities are that both have some mistakes in grammar and links. All of them even had fewer reference to support with. I wanted to improve these articles, but I can't do them all by my own, as I myself have too many personal work to do. Can you help me do an improvisation on these articles with me? I rather wait for your response first before I continue on. Thanks! LikeRealTimes (talk) 01:23, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

I also have personal work to do on my own, so I'm sorry if I couldn't help you with these articles. Allyriana000 (talk) 02:43, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pinoy Big Brother: Teen Edition 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rizal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Miss World 2023 for the second time to host country in india

please stop remove that "This is the second time that the Miss World pageant has been held in India." because in 1996 for the first time to host country for Miss World 1996 thanks. Joseatienza (talk) 17:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

please never again remove that "This is the second time that the Miss World pageant has been held in India." in the top in article of Miss World 2023 because i really want it thank you. Joseatienza (talk) 09:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Nope, will still remove irrelevant and unsourced parts that you'll add as it does not adhere to the rules to Wikipedia. Allyriana000 (talk) 09:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Miss World 2023. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Again you are edit warring. Joseatienza (talk) 09:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Stop copying @Sciencefish's comment on your talk page. It won't work on me. Allyriana000 ([[User talk:{{unblock-spamun|khalidcazanit|i'm not promoting any business i'm just trying to spread informations by my articles on wikipedia#top|talk]]) 12:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at Miss World 2023. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Allyriana000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I apologize for the actions that I have made in the aforementioned article. My actions towards a certain user is wrong, and instead of reaching a consensus, I took the wrong way and blatantly reverted their edits. I may have good intentions, but those intentions do not always reciprocate my actions. I promise that I will not do it again, and continue to only add information and follow the three-revert rule. I do not wish to cause any harm to any user, and I do sincerely apologize for my actions. Allyriana000 (talk) 15:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Accept reason:

As discussed below, I have unblocked you sitewide and pblocked you from editing Miss World 2023 for two weeks. Bbb23 (talk) 19:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Do you understand that 1) edits that you disagree with are not vandalism and 2) the three revert rule is not an entitlement to three reverts, that you can be edit warring with fewer reverts? How will you resolve editing disputes in the future? 331dot (talk) 16:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I do understand that edits that I disagree with are not vandalism. Yes I do also know that edit warring with reverts fewer than three is possible depending on the behavior of the user. In the future, I would resolve editing disputes by discussing the matter on the talk page of the article, and not solely relying on edit summaries to give a comment. I would also only revert edits when it is necessary, and would not cause harm/edit warring with other users. Allyriana000 (talk) 16:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

@331dot: Sounds good to me, but @Bbb23: can be a hard sell. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

@331dot and Deepfriedokra: Do I detect a dig, Dfo? How about an unblock in exchange for Allyriana agreeing to a 2-week restriction against editing Miss World 2023 (the article, not the Talk page)? I'd make the restriction only one week, but I blocked the other user for a week, and I'd prefer their being "back" before the restriction expires.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

@Bbb23: Sounds good to me. Maybe make it a two week WP:PARTIALBLOCK as a reminder. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Allyriana, do you agree to change the sitewide block to a 2-week pblock from the article?--Bbb23 (talk) 18:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

I agree to this. Allyriana000 (talk) 18:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

I guess I'm too late

I warned another editor about editwarring at Miss Universe Philippines 2024 and was going to add a caution for you here, but it looks like I'm too late for that. Please be more careful and use the talkpages if there's an issue. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

This is noted, thank you. Allyriana000 (talk) 09:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)