User talk:Americanmafiacarmine

Americanmafiacarmine, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Americanmafiacarmine! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gambino crime family, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Colombo crime family. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hmains (talk) 02:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bonanno crime family, you may be blocked from editing. Hmains (talk) 02:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Philadelphia crime family. Hmains (talk) 02:58, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nicodemo Scarfo. Hmains (talk) 02:59, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the characterizations and adjectives that you are adding to articles are not in line with Wikipedia guidelines because they are unsourced and appear to be personal opinions or descriptions. Also, some of them appear contrary to guidelines in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. For further information about editing Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:Five Pillars, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Help:Footnotes, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Other helpful Wikipedia pages include: Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; and Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T♦C 03:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]