User talk:Anastasiia09

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Anastasiia09, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Maytech, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Maytech[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Maytech requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.maytech.net/pdf/Maytech_Security_and_Confidentiality_Statement.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anastasiia09. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:16, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Diannaa. I have received your email. Anastasiia09 (talk) 14:06, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

Your addition to User:Anastasiia09/Maytech has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:17, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage[edit]

Hello Anastasiia09. I see you have re-posted the content from Draft:Maytech onto your user page. On April 24 I asked you to not re-post the draft to this wiki until it has been cleaned of all copyright material. I see that you added an OTRS template to your userpage, but I don't think it's appropriate to post the copyright content here until such time as a permission email is received from the copyright holder releasing the material under a compatible license. These copyright rules apply to all parts of the wiki: drafts, user pages, and articles. The material can be re-added (as an article draft, not to your user page) once the permission email is received. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:44, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: Ok, it seems I do not clearly understood you on 24 April. I just needed some space were I can edit and modify the article. I won't post it to my user page anymore, for now the article is located here User:Anastasiia09/Maytech. I'm working on removing all copyright material from this article and hopefully it will be ready for submission soon.Thank you. Anastasiia09 (talk) 07:48, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maytech (May 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maytech and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Anastasiia09, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maytech (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Companies included in Wikipedia need to have first received significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources. Interviews, press releases and anything the company submitted to another website for publication cannot be considered independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maytech and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:12, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing disclosure[edit]

Hello Anastasiia09. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Maytech. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

If you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anastasiia09. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anastasiia09|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Drm310: Hi, nice to meet you. I'm not compensated for my edits on Wikipedia. It was my own wish to create a page on Wikipedia about Maytech. I sincerely hope you can review the article and let it be published. I made it so short and precise. Would you be so kind to review it? I dream to see it live! Thanks! Anastasiia09 (talk) 13:56, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Maytech concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Maytech, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maytech[edit]

Hello, Anastasiia09. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maytech".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]