User talk:Andrew Gray/Archives/17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to Poland Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, New South Wales Casliber (submissions) and Canada Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) 09:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

14:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Emerson Middle School (New Jersey). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Amusement Park Quarter 3, 2013 Newsletter

22:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michael Knighton

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Michael Knighton. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:18, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 64th (2nd Highland) Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameron Highlanders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #65

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article Incubator. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 20:17, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Hampshire County Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub West Sussex County Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
92 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Gordon Highlanders (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Add sources
80 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B Battle Dress (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
151 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start M4 Sherman variants (talk) Please add more content Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Lincolnshire County Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
37 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Egyptian Expeditionary Force (talk) Please add more images Cleanup
33 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start 79th Armoured Division (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Cleanup
7 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Queen's Own Worcestershire Hussars (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Cleanup
221 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start XXX Corps (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Expand
240 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B The Rifles (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Expand
50 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Essex Regiment (talk) Please add more sources Expand
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Rock Bay, Victoria (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
135 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Tai-Pan (novel) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
31 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Force 10 From Navarone (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
38 Quality: High, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: GA King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster) (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Merge
125 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Line infantry (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Merge
207 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Royal Regiment of Scotland (talk) Please add more sources Merge
79 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Buffs (Royal East Kent Regiment) (talk) Please add more sources Wikify
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start 5th Infantry Division (India) (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Wikify
106 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start History of the Royal Marines (talk) Please add more sources Wikify
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Frederick Joseph Loftus-Tottenham (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start British Land Units of the First World War (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Orphan
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Salamanca order of battle (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start British V-class submarine (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more sources Stub
15 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start 59th (Staffordshire) Infantry Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start 7th Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start 160th (Wales) Brigade (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Yorkshire County Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub 42nd Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

18:28, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: June 2013





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 15:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

I have started a discussion at Talk:Rights of Englishmen. No rush on this. Bearian (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Wikipedia controversies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

Wikidata weekly summary #66

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Hi. I notice that you're the one who fully protected this template five years ago, with the stated reason of it being a "vandal target". Currently, it's transcluded to 800 pages, which normally only warrants semi-protection, not full-. I was wondering if you'd be willing to reconsider. If it weren't fully protected, there are several bold changes I'd love to make to it, and I don't think it's fair for some vandals from years ago to stop me from that. Thanks. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 00:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! I've made the changes I want to, though I think it might be a good idea to leave it unprotected for a few more days, in case someone wants to revert me, or if I notice a minor false positive or negative caused by my changes, and want to fix it. (I'll also be traveling tomorrow, and starting an internship on Monday, so I might be away from my computer for some longer-than-usual stretches of time over the next 48 hours or so.)
Oh, and on the general point, I agree with you that this template is probably high risk due to the prominence of some of the articles it's used on. Then again, until yesterday any random editor could've edited Module:Authority control, transcluded to thousands upon thousands of BLPs, and not a single one thought to. (Though maybe the GNAA and Encyclopedia Dramatica guys were just too lazy to learn Lua.) — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 23:30, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Knesset speakers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 22:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

17:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

James Currie

Thanks for the Who's Who reference, and could you please return to answer a second request? 2001:18E8:2:1020:3851:4713:742B:BDCC (talk) 13:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fabrika automobila Priboj. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 23:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

Wikidata weekly summary #67

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Please comment on Talk:Quantifier variance

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Quantifier variance. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

20:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Hampshire County Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Essex County Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
115 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B Infantry of the British Army (talk) Please add more sources Add sources
76 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B Battle Dress (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub West Sussex County Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start 29th Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
523 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Israel Defense Forces ranks (talk) Please add more sources Cleanup
252 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start XXX Corps (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Cleanup
40 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Egyptian Expeditionary Force (talk) Please add more images Cleanup
245 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B The Rifles (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Expand
47 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Essex Regiment (talk) Please add more sources Expand
149 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: C I Corps (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more images Please add more sources Expand
160 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Soldier Soldier (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Rock Bay, Victoria (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
133 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Tai-Pan (novel) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
35 Quality: High, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: GA King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster) (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Merge
175 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Royal Regiment of Scotland (talk) Please add more sources Merge
25 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA 39th Infantry Division (United States) (talk) Merge
36 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start 79th Armoured Division (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Wikify
23 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Anglo-Portuguese Army (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Wikify
77 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Buffs (Royal East Kent Regiment) (talk) Please add more sources Wikify
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Salamanca order of battle (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Entrenching battalions (World War I) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start David Block (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
28 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub 7th Armored Brigade (Israel) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start 160th (Wales) Brigade (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Northumberland County Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Norfolk County Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Stub
87 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start 59th (Staffordshire) Infantry Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Yorkshire County Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:42, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
91 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: A Duke of Wellington's Regiment (talk) Please add more sources Add sources
339 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Warlord (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Lincolnshire County Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
639 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Militia (talk) Add sources
33 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Royal Hampshire Regiment (talk) Please add more sources Add sources
31 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Territorial Force (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
25 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start 5th Infantry Division (India) (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Cleanup
89 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start History of the Royal Marines (talk) Please add more sources Cleanup
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start West Riding Artillery (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Cleanup
83 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Lancashire Fusiliers (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Expand
41 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start 11th Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Expand
71 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B Royal Northumberland Fusiliers (talk) Please add more sources Expand
5,533 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Sigmund Freud (talk) Unencyclopaedic
599 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Insurgency (talk) Please add more images Unencyclopaedic
36 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Force 10 From Navarone (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
58 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub 4th Canadian Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Merge
125 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Line infantry (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Merge
87 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start 3rd Canadian Division (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Merge
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Queen's Own Worcestershire Hussars (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Wikify
15 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Fife and Forfar Yeomanry (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Wikify
44 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B History of the Australian Army (talk) Please add more sources Wikify
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Order of battle for Campaign of Northern and Eastern Henan 1938 (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
19 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Military service by the members of the British Royal Family (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more sources Orphan
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Alex Selsky (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start 9th Armoured Division (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Stub
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start 8th Armoured Division (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Gas attack at Hulluch (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start 7th Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Support Command (British Army) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub 42nd Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:29, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 01:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)